Yep it scores the same, 1 pointjonp wrote:Didnt see the fight heard it was close.Is this right im not too hot on amatuer stuff, two standing counts is the same as two scoring left jabs in the scoring system?
Or do you geta bit extra for a count because it seems odd that a fast accurate jab is scored the same as a well placed big right that makes you wobble and get a count
Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
And hurt him numerous times. He should have won that fightsafeerah wrote:The Ukrainian gave Ogoggo 2 standing 8 counts.
Another piss poor decision.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
No chance they will reverse that decision. No chance at all.Hagler2002 wrote:Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
Fvcking getting embarrassing now.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
said they would, be interesting after the Japanese fighter won his appeal, with the Ukranian being a world champion, it could carry more weight, but it is against the home fighter so who knows what could happen ?Hagler2002 wrote:Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
It may be a print error but on the Olympic official website the count back scores add up to 53-52 to the Ukrainian.safeerah wrote:said they would, be interesting after the Japanese fighter won his appeal, with the Ukranian being a world champion, it could carry more weight, but it is against the home fighter so who knows what could happen ?Hagler2002 wrote:Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Boxing is boxing it seems it doesn't matter what level you are fight at. Just too much money in boxing is causing these terrible decision. If Anthothy makes it to the finals the monetary rewards are imense.Hagler2002 wrote:It may be a print error but on the Olympic official website the count back scores add up to 53-52 to the Ukrainian.safeerah wrote:said they would, be interesting after the Japanese fighter won his appeal, with the Ukranian being a world champion, it could carry more weight, but it is against the home fighter so who knows what could happen ?Hagler2002 wrote:Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Interesting, could there be another decision changed ?Hagler2002 wrote:It may be a print error but on the Olympic official website the count back scores add up to 53-52 to the Ukrainian.safeerah wrote:said they would, be interesting after the Japanese fighter won his appeal, with the Ukranian being a world champion, it could carry more weight, but it is against the home fighter so who knows what could happen ?Hagler2002 wrote:Just read on Twitter the Ukrainians have lodged an appeal.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
I don't think you can compare the two situations.
The Japanese fighter was reinstated because two knockdowns were not scored.
In Agogo's case I'm told all of the Judge's cards compare very well in terms of which shots were scored for both fighters.
The only dispute potentially is on the count back and if Buncey says he won, he won ! 8)
I'll be surprised if he gets back in.
Now whether we all agree with the Judges score cards is another matter .... but if the cards are all consistant an appeal is going nowhere.
The Japanese fighter was reinstated because two knockdowns were not scored.
In Agogo's case I'm told all of the Judge's cards compare very well in terms of which shots were scored for both fighters.
The only dispute potentially is on the count back and if Buncey says he won, he won ! 8)
I'll be surprised if he gets back in.
Now whether we all agree with the Judges score cards is another matter .... but if the cards are all consistant an appeal is going nowhere.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Doesn't look like it:jessi wrote: Interesting, could there be another decision changed ?
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/ogogo- ... -dismissed
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
I posted this on the amateur forum, but I scored the Ogogo fight, and had it 20-15 for Khytrov (5-5, 9-6, 6-4). I had the same total for Ogogo as the judges in the first two rounds, but had Khytrov getting underscored in both rounds. I thought both fighters were overscored in the third - more punches were thrown, but most of it looked to me like it was hitting gloves or missing.
Re: Are the Olympic judges biased towards GB fighters?
Thats pretty much how I saw it scoring wise. I kept thinking that he'd only need to keep it close to win, and the first round he managed it. Second round scoring told me Agogo would win the fight unless he was stopped. I'm not going mad about it, good luck to him, bet he's been on the wrong end of a decision before and it happens in every Olympics. I just have two thoughts on the matter, 1) I hope it doesn't become any more blatant as the tournament wears on, and 2) Massive respect again to Audley and De Galeemile wrote:I posted this on the amateur forum, but I scored the Ogogo fight, and had it 20-15 for Khytrov (5-5, 9-6, 6-4). I had the same total for Ogogo as the judges in the first two rounds, but had Khytrov getting underscored in both rounds. I thought both fighters were overscored in the third - more punches were thrown, but most of it looked to me like it was hitting gloves or missing.