Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Counter-puncher »

i take it Lomachenko looked good mate? what division is he in?
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by JamesH »

Counter-puncher wrote:i take it Lomachenko looked good mate? what division is he in?
Oh held a lot back but was slipping punches for fun. Won easily but didnt have to get out of first gear.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Counter-puncher »

welter?
jessi
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by jessi »

Counter-puncher wrote:welter?
60 kg light
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by dondada »

mcato wrote:
Poncey wrote:Wow :o

This reminds me of when Phelps didn't win the 2008 gold medal they said he did.
Boxing is dodgy at all levels. Ogogo didnt win, however there is too much money incentives for the winner of the gold medal and thats why there is so much cheating.
I just don't believe this.

How efficient would they have to be to cheat and get it 18 each and then 52 each? Nah, I don't think so. Biased, maybe but if they were going to cheat they'd have to guarantee a clearer job than that.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by dondada »

Counter-puncher wrote:i take it Lomachenko looked good mate? what division is he in?
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/olympi ... -his-class
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5346
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by dr_devious »

I was at the Excel today and Ogogu's decision was virtually a highway robbery. No way did he win the fight against a very good Ukrainian. To the extent that Ogogu took 2 counts in the second round and still won the round on 2 out of 5 judges cards!!! Lomachenko looks very special, and Khyrov was the best MW on show as well. Joshua got a gift decision last night but Ogogu's was ridiculous. Great atmosphere for the Ogogu fight though
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by reggaereggae »

There are always bad decisions and also the home fighter is always favoured somewhat..... bad for the Ukrainian but the bigger picture is that it is expected
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Anthony Ogogo

Post by DMA1987 »

tonyevs wrote:A disgusting result. Probably the worse result i have seen so far.
An even first round. From then on he was a clear loser.

Disgusting. No way did he deserve the verdict. Results like this highlight just what a shit sport the amateur sport is.
You honestly think that was worse than the Joshua decision?

I think your interpretation of a 'disgusting result' must be different than mine, was a properly close fight.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by states »

I know I'm teaching people to suck eggs here, but judging is subjective. I wouldn't have made Ogogo the winner myself, but that second standing count was nonsense. Especially as he took far better shots in the last round.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: Anthony Ogogo

Post by Sweet P »

tonyevs wrote:A disgusting result. Probably the worse result i have seen so far.
An even first round. From then on he was a clear loser.

Disgusting. No way did he deserve the verdict. Results like this highlight just what a shit sport the amateur sport is.
Absolutely agree, the judging has been disgraceful in these Olympics.
I wouldn't say it's the worst decision so far. There have been some shockers.

And people can say judging is subjective, that's bullshit.
Amateur judging is just about scoring clean punches. Nothing else factors into it.
manno
Cruiserweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by manno »

Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Finn »

manno wrote:Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
im pretty sure most posters on here understand AM boxing thanks.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5841
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by tonyevs »

Maybe the Ogogo result wasn't as bad as the Joshua reult .. It certainly looked it at the time though.

But thats it for me now. Won't be wasting my time watching the amateurs. Was never a big fan of the modern game anyways and it certainly hasn't got me excited ... frustrated, yes.

.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by dondada »

manno wrote:Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
:TU:
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by dondada »

kingfinn wrote:
manno wrote:Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
im pretty sure most posters on here understand AM boxing thanks.
Yeah, you would think so, wouldn't you? Plenty don't seem to though. In the pro ranks, that lad would have beaten Ogogo every time...but it was a much closer fight under ams judging.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Crease »

I'm delighted for Anthony Ogogo. And I thought it was a very close fight. If the Ukrainian did win that fight, does this mean that Ogogo is a hype job? And he's not as good as McCracken and Froch keep hyping about him.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5841
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by tonyevs »

Crease wrote:I'm delighted for Anthony Ogogo. And I thought it was a very close fight. If the Ukrainian did win that fight, does this mean that Ogogo is a hype job? And he's not as good as McCracken and Froch keep hyping about him.

Not sure about that .. but very sure he isn`t anywhere as good as the Ukranian kid.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22948
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by mickey1975 »

It was a close fight.
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Scrap »

Havent, seen the Fight as yet. But even running Khytrov close is saying a great deal, for Ogogo,s improvement, I thought He would get slaughtered.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by JamesH »

Been to plenty of am shows so am familiar with scoring system. Its like me assuming people who thought Agogo won are just agreeing with what Woodhall probably said. I still think Agogo lost, I'll watch it again - this time on tv - but with what I saw on the day, Agogo lost for me.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Finn »

dondada wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
manno wrote:Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
im pretty sure most posters on here understand AM boxing thanks.
Yeah, you would think so, wouldn't you? Plenty don't seem to though. In the pro ranks, that lad would have beaten Ogogo every time...but it was a much closer fight under ams judging.
My initial thought was he had lost the 3rd round clearly, but when you see the slow mo most of the stuff was on the gloves , shoulder or back of head. Having said that i still think the Ukranian won by a couple of points, it was closer than people say but still Agogo was lucky. I dont see the big deal home fighters would get the nod in a very close fight in the pro's anyway, i know it bothers some people but it doesnt really bother me, home town decisions do but a bit of it a "i cant make my mind up who won the round it was really close" so give it to the guy whos fans are cheering - thats hometown advantage imo.

I havent seen the joshua fight but i know george groves was tweeting some stroppy stuff about one or two other fights including the cuba v iran DQ.
Last edited by Finn on 03 Aug 2012, 16:02, edited 1 time in total.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by Finn »

tonyevs wrote:
Crease wrote:I'm delighted for Anthony Ogogo. And I thought it was a very close fight. If the Ukrainian did win that fight, does this mean that Ogogo is a hype job? And he's not as good as McCracken and Froch keep hyping about him.

Not sure about that .. but very sure he isn`t anywhere as good as the Ukranian kid.
he would have been stopped in the pro's i think he had the skills but was getting bullied and didnt have the power to push the ukranian back, having said that agogo doesnt look like he would be fighting at middle weight for very long in the pros he'd be better at light heavy once he matures.
manno
Cruiserweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by manno »

kingfinn wrote:
manno wrote:Walking a guy down if your not landing counts for f.all in the ams, same as those counts- only count as one scoring punch plus one of em was never a count anyway. Too many ppl judging the bout on a par with pro boxing plus you then have the 5judges who have to press the buttons. Close bout and i loved the other guys style but no robbery.
im pretty sure most posters on here understand AM boxing thanks.
Wasn't suggesting most posters dont understand AM boxing at all but i would say most posters are fans of pro boxing 1st just by the nature of the threads while ive been on here myself and that the two sports often become dilluted on the subject of scoring etc. Had 1 or 2 fights myself as pro that if had been scored by amateur judges would have gone the other way. Sorry if i sounded condescending :TU:
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6612
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Anthony Ogogo - SPOILER

Post by rhino222 »

dr_devious wrote:I was at the Excel today and Ogogu's decision was virtually a highway robbery. No way did he win the fight against a very good Ukrainian. To the extent that Ogogu took 2 counts in the second round and still won the round on 2 out of 5 judges cards!!! Lomachenko looks very special, and Khyrov was the best MW on show as well. Joshua got a gift decision last night but Ogogu's was ridiculous. Great atmosphere for the Ogogu fight though
standing counts are only an appreciation of a good 'tag', they do not count negatively against the receiver of the count, if i fought and landed 3 decent blows to the target area against an opponent and he landed on ly 2 against me (even though i received a standing count for both blows)... i would still be 3-2 up and i would win the round, not that winning the round counts, its all about the final score.
Post Reply