yiddo14 wrote:Does that extend itself to all fighters that have benefitted from dodgy decisions ( such as Michael Conlan? ) or is it simply restricted to these two lads?tonyevs wrote:I am surprised to see that neither the Joshua v Cotilla or Ogogo v Kyhtrov matches were said to have any sort of controversy about them in this weeks BN ... hmmm .. did the wise sages of BN think they were fair decisions?![]()
There was however a piece by Teddy Atlas mentioning these games are damaging the sport with the silly decisions. He goes as far as saying these London games are the worse yet for boxing. From what I have seen .. he is spot on yet again.
If Joshua and Ogogo are lucky enough to get a gold .. even if they deserve the verdicts in these later fights. It will be very hollow success as far as I am concerned after the gift decision they each recieved on their way to the final.
As far as I am concerned. The best man in both contests was not moved forward.
Seems Joshua and Ogogo are attracting more grief than the other fighters who have had decisions go their way. Why is that? Is it their nationality? Their colour? Hard to understand.
I hope the pair of them go on and win gold and enjoy all the trappings an Olympic Gold can give to a young fighter turning pro.
Of course I feel for their opponents, Savon especially, who both deserved to win their fights with the two British lads but I'm not blaming the winners, it's the officials fault.
So, hypothetically speaking, if a Brit had hammered in the final, totally taken to school but got a victory, would you be jumping around thinking it was great?