Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

Does anyone know why Rose is not fighting Sam Webb anymore?
Trudge
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 14 Mar 2012, 13:06

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by Trudge »

There were issues with tying up the deal for the fight to take place as planned on the Price v Harrison bill and Brian will still fight Sam Webb, probably in December.
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

Trudge wrote:There were issues with tying up the deal for the fight to take place as planned on the Price v Harrison bill and Brian will still fight Sam Webb, probably in December.
I guess theres gonna be lots of changes now because Maloney hasn't got Sky. There will be a lot of twist & turns in British boxing because of TV deals and money or in this case lack of money.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse, why a replacement was not brought in, don't know, plenty of good fighters are waiting in line, Webb could of fought the winner afterwards, the control of titles in this country is a joke, the aim is to hold on to a title as long as possible, without being truly tested.
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse, why a replacement was not brought in, don't know, plenty of good fighters are waiting in line, Webb could of fought the winner afterwards, the control of titles in this country is a joke, the aim is to hold on to a title as long as possible, without being truly tested.
I do agree with that Saf. The biggest joke at the moment is why Jamie Cox is allowed to hold on to the Com Wel. Belt for nearly a year because of injury knowing that he will not go to Ghana to fight Sai. All these things just holds up the division.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by leforge »

safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse, why a replacement was not brought in, don't know, plenty of good fighters are waiting in line, Webb could of fought the winner afterwards, the control of titles in this country is a joke, the aim is to hold on to a title as long as possible, without being truly tested.
Did Maloney win purse bids?
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

leforge wrote:
safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse, why a replacement was not brought in, don't know, plenty of good fighters are waiting in line, Webb could of fought the winner afterwards, the control of titles in this country is a joke, the aim is to hold on to a title as long as possible, without being truly tested.
Did Maloney win purse bids?
I just read Rose said wanted a WBC rating. Harris last fought at 10.3 he has never fought at light mid and lost most of his last 7 fights. This fight is a waste of time. Boxing is getting very sad. I was getting dishearted with football last season but least they have to play each other this is becoming a joke!
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by whiskey »

Harris is a shell of a shell of a shot fighter.

That was when he fought Carlos Maussa - let alone 2007 when he fought Witter. Now he is completely pointless.
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

G0mez wrote:Harris is a shell of a shell of a shot fighter.

That was when he fought Carlos Maussa - let alone 2007 when he fought Witter. Now he is completely pointless.
What can Rose get out of this fight?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by Horse »

mcato wrote:What can Rose get out of this fight?
A name on his record.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

mcato wrote:
Trudge wrote:There were issues with tying up the deal for the fight to take place as planned on the Price v Harrison bill and Brian will still fight Sam Webb, probably in December.
I guess theres gonna be lots of changes now because Maloney hasn't got Sky. There will be a lot of twist & turns in British boxing because of TV deals and money or in this case lack of money.
As far as I know allegedly do not pay for boxing shows over here, I don't know how it works with a bigger promoter like Maloney Promotions, maybe they pay for bigger shows. Hennessey only got a pound when he got
channel 5, so he used advertising to raise the money.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

leforge wrote:
safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse, why a replacement was not brought in, don't know, plenty of good fighters are waiting in line, Webb could of fought the winner afterwards, the control of titles in this country is a joke, the aim is to hold on to a title as long as possible, without being truly tested.
Did Maloney win purse bids?
Yes mate,as far as I know.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

Horse wrote:
mcato wrote:What can Rose get out of this fight?
A name on his record.
A light welter against a light middle, it won't mean much over here or in the states, what ranking will he get from fighting someone from a much lower weight division and Rose already has a world ranking with the WBC for winning the british title
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

G0mez wrote:Harris is a shell of a shell of a shot fighter.

That was when he fought Carlos Maussa - let alone 2007 when he fought Witter. Now he is completely pointless.
He stunk the house out last time he fought here and hardly threw a punch until a clash of heads ended the fight against David Barnes.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by Horse »

safeerah wrote:A light welter against a light middle, it won't mean much over here or in the states, what ranking will he get from fighting someone from a much lower weight division and Rose already has a world ranking with the WBC for winning the british title
It won't be a huge win, but it is still a decent name to have on his record. I don't see the problem with this fight.
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

Horse wrote:
safeerah wrote:A light welter against a light middle, it won't mean much over here or in the states, what ranking will he get from fighting someone from a much lower weight division and Rose already has a world ranking with the WBC for winning the british title
It won't be a huge win, but it is still a decent name to have on his record. I don't see the problem with this fight.
You dont see the problem with this fight??? With 9 others fighters in the top ten. This is the reason why boxing is losing out to MMA. Rubbish fights.
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

mcato wrote:
Horse wrote:
safeerah wrote:A light welter against a light middle, it won't mean much over here or in the states, what ranking will he get from fighting someone from a much lower weight division and Rose already has a world ranking with the WBC for winning the british title
It won't be a huge win, but it is still a decent name to have on his record. I don't see the problem with this fight.
You dont see the problem with this fight??? With 9 others fighters in the top ten. This is the reason why boxing is losing out to MMA. Rubbish fights.
Its not a title fight so Rose will come in at 11.3 and Harris 10.6 at the most and the point of this fight is?????
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by pyenest77 »

Exactly there is no point, but apart from big cards where there maybe a decent match up at the top of the bill where are the 50/50 matches.

Answer they arent!!
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by Jeff Thomas »

It's a fascinating fight. I don't see the problem at all.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by Horse »

mcato wrote:You dont see the problem with this fight??? With 9 others fighters in the top ten. This is the reason why boxing is losing out to MMA. Rubbish fights.
Rose has had three British title fights in the last 9 months. He will fight Webb in a few months.

Why can't he have a non-title fight in between defences?
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

Horse wrote:
mcato wrote:You dont see the problem with this fight??? With 9 others fighters in the top ten. This is the reason why boxing is losing out to MMA. Rubbish fights.
Rose has had three British title fights in the last 9 months. He will fight Webb in a few months.

Why can't he have a non-title fight in between defences?
Yeah I suppose if I was Rose I would like an easy safe fight aswell.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by bripez »

safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse,
The current system is bollox and needs to be changed.

Surely a promoter puts in a purse bid based on their due dilligence (i.e. they have looked at who the boxers are and what he could "sell" and what he would need to pay them both - he then bids accordingly).

For a promoter to turn around months later saying it "did not work out financially" is wrong - if they cannot sell the fight then don't bid. If a bid is made then it is up to the promoter to promotes the fight (it is in their job title !)

If the boxers want a high purse, or he thinks that he can only sell so many tickets then bid lower - how simple could it be ? it is supplier/demand economics at the most basic level.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by safeerah »

bripez wrote:
safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse,
The current system is bollox and needs to be changed.

Surely a promoter puts in a purse bid based on their due dilligence (i.e. they have looked at who the boxers are and what he could "sell" and what he would need to pay them both - he then bids accordingly).

For a promoter to turn around months later saying it "did not work out financially" is wrong - if they cannot sell the fight then don't bid. If a bid is made then it is up to the promoter to promotes the fight (it is in their job title !)

If the boxers want a high purse, or he thinks that he can only sell so many tickets then bid lower - how simple could it be ? it is supplier/demand economics at the most basic level.
Your right. The problem is that promoters don't have to pay a penalty if they don't for fill thier commitment, so they can put in a big bid just to stop other promoters getting the fight, this is bad for the boxers, trainers and managers, work put in for nothing. We had an eliminator for the English title against Jamie Ball, the winner to fight Erick Ochieng for the English title, our fighter had won the !st three rounds, then an accidental clash of heads caused a cut in the 4th round, which caused the fight to become a technical draw, the problem is that the BBB of C never called for the rematch or put it to purse bids again, since Ochieng has fought journeyman Alan Lowe for his title and now he is fighting another fighter, so the eliminator was for nothing.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by danconnollyeire »

G0mez wrote:Harris is a shell of a shell of a shot fighter.

That was when he fought Carlos Maussa - let alone 2007 when he fought Witter. Now he is completely pointless.
He's a glorified journeyman
mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

Re: Brian Rose vs Vivian Harris What happen to Sam Webb???

Post by mcato »

safeerah wrote:
bripez wrote:
safeerah wrote:The fight between Brian Rose and Sam Webb did not work out financially, I believe tickets was the main problem, because it went to purse bids, the fighters would be on a good purse,
The current system is bollox and needs to be changed.

Surely a promoter puts in a purse bid based on their due dilligence (i.e. they have looked at who the boxers are and what he could "sell" and what he would need to pay them both - he then bids accordingly).

For a promoter to turn around months later saying it "did not work out financially" is wrong - if they cannot sell the fight then don't bid. If a bid is made then it is up to the promoter to promotes the fight (it is in their job title !)

If the boxers want a high purse, or he thinks that he can only sell so many tickets then bid lower - how simple could it be ? it is supplier/demand economics at the most basic level.
Your right. The problem is that promoters don't have to pay a penalty if they don't for fill thier commitment, so they can put in a big bid just to stop other promoters getting the fight, this is bad for the boxers, trainers and managers, work put in for nothing. We had an eliminator for the English title against Jamie Ball, the winner to fight Erick Ochieng for the English title, our fighter had won the !st three rounds, then an accidental clash of heads caused a cut in the 4th round, which caused the fight to become a technical draw, the problem is that the BBB of C never called for the rematch or put it to purse bids again, since Ochieng has fought journeyman Alan Lowe for his title and now he is fighting another fighter, so the eliminator was for nothing.
Yeah boxing is a tough old game! Not fair all the time!
Post Reply