Ricky Burns
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Ricky Burns
Burns is the best active British fighter.
But I like being contrary sometimes. And I love Froch as much as the next man, unless the next man is a Canadian by way of Romania.
But I like being contrary sometimes. And I love Froch as much as the next man, unless the next man is a Canadian by way of Romania.
-
GreenLightning
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23
Re: Ricky Burns
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no fornicating WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?
-
GreenLightning
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23
Re: Ricky Burns
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no fornicating WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?
-
GreenLightning
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23
Re: Ricky Burns
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
Re: Ricky Burns
To be fair, I have viewed the British forum without logging on. I know at a time you couldn't do that but I've always been able to view the other forums without being a member.jonp wrote:You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
Re: Ricky Burns
I didn't say you was or should be 'worried'. and I'm not from Dagenham by the waybilly nelson wrote:Listen mate the last thing I'm worried about is RUMOURS you have heard,rest assured I'm im in no way uptight about Ricky's fight with Kevin I'm 100 percent confident has I know I have the better all round fighter.Dagenham BoxrobBoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.![]()
Re: Ricky Burns
Thats brilliantbilly nelson wrote:ps Ricky looked great in sparring today!
Re: Ricky Burns
You can observe the British forum without joining, which I have been doing, not just the British.jonp wrote:You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
Re: Ricky Burns
Your not worried about it I thought? No big source, just a few general people who I thought was in the know.Wow, didn't realise I'd be shot down for asking opinions on what I heardbilly nelson wrote:And do inform us all were you heard your rumour fromBoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Ricky Burns
I prefer where there's no smoke there's no fire myself.GreenLightning wrote:BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no effing WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?
Re: Ricky Burns
Thats not the case though....mfc_se15 wrote:jonp wrote:You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I didn't know that was the case but assuming it is that is class haha!!
Re: Ricky Burns
Yes, good point. Thats not the right phrase...GreenLightning wrote:BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?
In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.
@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no effing WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?
Re: Ricky Burns
Don't just observe British forum, and not just this site either. Also, have just been on this forum without logging in?jonp wrote:Joining date is just under yr user name.Also try using the british forum if your not logged in
Re: Ricky Burns
Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.
Re: Ricky Burns
jonp wrote:Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.
Re: Ricky Burns
jonp wrote:Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.
Re: Ricky Burns
Anyone who has observed the forums would know that whenver you voice an opinion then you are there to be agreed or disagreed with, relax its not personal when people question you. Now is there any truth in the rumour that Ricky Burns is planning to switch trainers?Cause trouble and BS talk?? Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't you
Re: Ricky Burns
Youve been qble to view without logging on for months and months, maybe 12. My ipad auto logs me out so very rare do i come into brit forum logged on. It was members only for couple years for the same reason everytime you write f-r-a-n-k-warr-e-n the word allegedly automaticaly came up, hence a lot of old posters refer to him as allegedly
Re: Ricky Burns
To be honest I don't know, a few people talking in the gym and Burns v Mitchell came up. Couple of them was discussing about Burns leaving his trainer, which for the record I thought was a bad idea this close to a big fight. Also for the record I believe that Burns wins this clear on points and that it would be a bad move if Burns was to switch trainers. (Take note Billy Nelson, before you 'jump' all over me)coachster wrote:Anyone who has observed the forums would know that whenver you voice an opinion then you are there to be agreed or disagreed with, relax its not personal when people question you. Now is there any truth in the rumour that Ricky Burns is planning to switch trainers?Cause trouble and BS talk?? Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't youDD
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Ricky Burns
Come on then rob what gym were you in when you allegedly heard this rumour?
Re: Ricky Burns
Billy, a bit of advice. Don't show your worried or bothered by it. It's the least of your worries...remember ;;-)billy nelson wrote:Come on then rob what gym were you in when you allegedly heard this rumour?
I dont care if you don't believe me. And to be honest, I personally couldn't care less if true or not. Just had an opinion that if it was true it wouldn't be a wise move to change this near a fight. The more the fight gets nearer of course the less likely this 'rumour' is true. So Billy, as each day passes you can chill alittle bit more
Re: Ricky Burns
Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Ricky Burns
Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefullyjessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
Re: Ricky Burns
Mitchell will slowly show everyone that the katsidis fight was nothing but a bad day at the office, burns will be knocked out in spectacular fashion to silence 10,000 jocks all at once !ShadrachSimmo wrote:Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefullyjessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
Re: Ricky Burns
jessi wrote:Mitchell will slowly show everyone that the katsidis fight was nothing but a bad day at the office, burns will be knocked out in spectacular fashion to silence 10,000 jocks all at once !ShadrachSimmo wrote:Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefullyjessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
Aye because we are all still laughing after Katsidis wiped him out without breaking sweat.