Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post Reply
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

Any news?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by Horse »

Apparently he was going to fight Yusaf Mack, but it fell through. They are meant to be announcing his next opponent tomorrow.

http://www.BS.com/carl-froch-l ... ugh--56365
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

Horse wrote:Apparently he was going to fight Yusaf Mack, but it fell through. They are meant to be announcing his next opponent tomorrow.

http://www.BS.com/carl-froch-l ... ugh--56365
Interesting, would have been good to see him fighting a light heavy as I still recon he's going to try for a title there before he retires.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by Horse »

josh fg wrote:Interesting, would have been good to see him fighting a light heavy as I still recon he's going to try for a title there before he retires.
A fight against Mack would not be appealing to me, so I am glad it hasn't been made.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

Horse wrote:
josh fg wrote:Interesting, would have been good to see him fighting a light heavy as I still recon he's going to try for a title there before he retires.
A fight against Mack would not be appealing to me, so I am glad it hasn't been made.
I don't think this one will be against a world beater as he has too many commitments coming up with the Bute rematch and possible Kesslar fight, so accepting that I would like to see him fight someone who offers a different challenge. Not that a gimme opponent is in Froch's mind set
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by Horse »

josh fg wrote:I don't think this one will be against a world beater as he has too many commitments coming up with the Bute rematch and possible Kesslar fight, so accepting that I would like to see him fight someone who offers a different challenge. Not that a gimme opponent is in Froch's mind set
If he is going to fight a lesser opponent than normal then I'd rather he fought Groves or DeGale, as at least they are British and well known here.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

Horse wrote:
josh fg wrote:I don't think this one will be against a world beater as he has too many commitments coming up with the Bute rematch and possible Kesslar fight, so accepting that I would like to see him fight someone who offers a different challenge. Not that a gimme opponent is in Froch's mind set
If he is going to fight a lesser opponent than normal then I'd rather he fought Groves or DeGale, as at least they are British and well known here.
Not a bad shout, wouldn't mind seeing him flatten DeGale, however if he's going to go domestic if I were his team I'd be going all out to get a rematch with Brian Magee, good top level fight he should be able to win and now a title unification fight (such as the WBA non super title is).
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13443
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by jameswilson »

josh fg wrote:
Horse wrote:
josh fg wrote:I don't think this one will be against a world beater as he has too many commitments coming up with the Bute rematch and possible Kesslar fight, so accepting that I would like to see him fight someone who offers a different challenge. Not that a gimme opponent is in Froch's mind set
If he is going to fight a lesser opponent than normal then I'd rather he fought Groves or DeGale, as at least they are British and well known here.
Not a bad shout, wouldn't mind seeing him flatten DeGale, however if he's going to go domestic if I were his team I'd be going all out to get a rematch with Brian Magee, good top level fight he should be able to win and now a title unification fight (such as the WBA non super title is).
If he fought for the WBA normal title he would have to relinquish either that title or the IBF title because there is already a Super champion in Ward.
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by fizzjambo »

If Mack is really the level of opponent being looked at then I'm not expecting much. I think he deserves a bit of an easier night though, Pavlik would have been perfect as IMO he'd have ruined him and have the value of a good 'name' on his record. Pavlik would want more than he is really worth though.

I'm fine with it being an easier night for Froch but the undercard must compensate accordingly........
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by earsjohn »

fizzjambo wrote:If Mack is really the level of opponent being looked at then I'm not expecting much. I think he deserves a bit of an easier night though, Pavlik would have been perfect as IMO he'd have ruined him and have the value of a good 'name' on his record. Pavlik would want more than he is really worth though.

I'm fine with it being an easier night for Froch but the undercard must compensate accordingly........
Ring Mag online are reporting that it's Mack http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/1744 ... -on-nov-17

Given the murderers row that Froch has gone through in the last 3-4 years, Mack is a decent mid-level ticking over kind of opponent - good enough to cause trouble if taken lightly, but not good enough to shock Froch on his A-game. Comparisons with the "gimme" opponents of the likes of Khan (Salita), Calzaghe (Pudwill, Veit II), Haye (Audley) and Burns (Cook) reflect well on Carl here.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by Horse »

josh fg wrote:Not a bad shout, wouldn't mind seeing him flatten DeGale, however if he's going to go domestic if I were his team I'd be going all out to get a rematch with Brian Magee, good top level fight he should be able to win and now a title unification fight (such as the WBA non super title is).
Magee would certainly be better than Mack. However, I'd rather see DeGale or Groves given the fight, as Froch has already beaten Magee and there would be less hype for a Froch vs Magee fight.

I doubt it will be Groves, DeGale or Magee though; since there doesn't seem to be much money on the table for Froch's next opponent.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

jameswilson wrote:
If he fought for the WBA normal title he would have to relinquish either that title or the IBF title because there is already a Super champion in Ward.
I forget how stupid the "Super-Champ" system is, Mendoza has ruined the respectability of that belt.
fizzjambo wrote:If Mack is really the level of opponent being looked at then I'm not expecting much. I think he deserves a bit of an easier night though, Pavlik would have been perfect as IMO he'd have ruined him and have the value of a good 'name' on his record. Pavlik would want more than he is really worth though.

I'm fine with it being an easier night for Froch but the undercard must compensate accordingly........
I think the good thing about Matchroom is that they have a few good boxers at all levels which bodes well for the undercard, I'lll get tickets if Gavin Rees is on the card.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by earsjohn »

Horse wrote:
josh fg wrote:Not a bad shout, wouldn't mind seeing him flatten DeGale, however if he's going to go domestic if I were his team I'd be going all out to get a rematch with Brian Magee, good top level fight he should be able to win and now a title unification fight (such as the WBA non super title is).
Magee would certainly be better than Mack. However, I'd rather see DeGale or Groves given the fight, as Froch has already beaten Magee and there would be less hype for a Froch vs Magee fight.

I doubt it will be Groves, DeGale or Magee though; since there doesn't seem to be much money on the table for Froch's next opponent.
I can't put my finger on why, but something tells me hell will freeze over before Matchrooms Carl Froch steps into a ring with FWPs James DeGale or FWPs George Groves.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by josh fg »

Horse wrote:
josh fg wrote:Not a bad shout, wouldn't mind seeing him flatten DeGale, however if he's going to go domestic if I were his team I'd be going all out to get a rematch with Brian Magee, good top level fight he should be able to win and now a title unification fight (such as the WBA non super title is).
Magee would certainly be better than Mack. However, I'd rather see DeGale or Groves given the fight, as Froch has already beaten Magee and there would be less hype for a Froch vs Magee fight.

I doubt it will be Groves, DeGale or Magee though; since there doesn't seem to be much money on the table for Froch's next opponent.
DeGale has promotional problems at the moment hasn't he, it may seem like a good opportunity to him if he has confidence in his ability, would be crazy for his advisers to allow him to do it but so is fighting for the EBU in another country.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by Horse »

earsjohn wrote:Given the murderers row that Froch has gone through in the last 3-4 years, Mack is a decent mid-level ticking over kind of opponent - good enough to cause trouble if taken lightly, but not good enough to shock Froch on his A-game. Comparisons with the "gimme" opponents of the likes of Khan (Salita), Calzaghe (Pudwill, Veit II), Haye (Audley) and Burns (Cook) reflect well on Carl here.
Froch is a higher rated fighter than those fighters were when they faced those opponents though.

I hold him to a higher standard than that lot and this is a disappointing fight.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by whiskey »

earsjohn wrote:
I can't put my finger on why, but something tells me hell will freeze over before Matchrooms Carl Froch steps into a ring with FWPs James DeGale or FWPs George Groves.
Carl likes George, they get on well. But Groves is on the up in the rankings and I don't think it would be wise to fight Froch, the difference in experience in too big at the minute to be truly competitive.

In 18 months if Carl is still around and a bit older, it might be a good fight though.
clintonmcphilbin
Cruiserweight
Posts: 366
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 12:49

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by clintonmcphilbin »

I would love to see froch fight sakio bika both men are proper warriors and bika gave ward lots problems and score was a lot wider then most people gave it. Degale and groves are still to green to box froch at this point.
el torro
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 02 Feb 2007, 11:56

Re: Wasn't Froch's next fight to be announced today?

Post by el torro »

Been confirmed as Yusef Mack
Post Reply