Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by Newport Daz »

Obviously a cheap opponent that will pose little danger. Calzaghe WBO reign all over again. Lot's of talk of fighting big name opponents only to be served up euro guys we've never heard of.
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by TopGun »

Newport Daz wrote:Obviously a cheap opponent that will pose little danger. Calzaghe WBO reign all over again. Lot's of talk of fighting big name opponents only to be served up euro guys we've never heard of.

My thoughts exactly....shame as Calzaghe could have earned a lot more money and I believe beaten a number of top fighters had he not been scarred of losing his '0'.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by milpool »

So is this Simcic fellow really Nathan's next opponent or are we just guessing?
Bronxbull666
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 384
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by Bronxbull666 »

It's about time Cleverly was stripped of the title. Let Bellew and Miranda fight for it. Frank and Clev don't even want to fight mandatories, and let's face it, WBO mandatories are generally not as good as the WBC, IBF, WBA. There should be a rule that states you must defend before 90 days and fight a mandatory every 180 days. By all means dish out an interim title during injury, but then the interim must fight the champion.

I do agree with 4 major titles, but it's extracting the urine now.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by taffytoon »

Bronxbull666 wrote:It's about time Cleverly was stripped of the title. Let Bellew and Miranda fight for it. Frank and Clev don't even want to fight mandatories, and let's face it, WBO mandatories are generally not as good as the WBC, IBF, WBA. There should be a rule that states you must defend before 90 days and fight a mandatory every 180 days. By all means dish out an interim title during injury, but then the interim must fight the champion.

I do agree with 4 major titles, but it's extracting the urine now.
Yeh because Bellew v Miranda is SOOOOOOOOoooo much better :lol: :lol: Another bitter and Delusional Bellew fan I see :zzz:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by whiskey »

taffytoon wrote:
Yeh because Bellew v Miranda is SOOOOOOOOoooo much better :lol: :lol: Another bitter and Delusional Bellew fan I see :zzz:
It is miles better. Miranda is proven quantity at world level - and whilst perhaps past his peak, at least we know what the guy even looks like.

Who is Simic ? I've never heard of the guy. And i bet 95% of hardcore boxing fans in the country haven't either.

Surely as a fan Taffy, you cannot be raptured with this opponent, especially after all the guff about Hopkins etc etc.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by taffytoon »

G0mez wrote:
taffytoon wrote:
Yeh because Bellew v Miranda is SOOOOOOOOoooo much better :lol: :lol: Another bitter and Delusional Bellew fan I see :zzz:
It is miles better. Miranda is proven quantity at world level - and whilst perhaps past his peak, at least we know what the guy even looks like.

Who is Simic ? I've never heard of the guy. And i bet 95% of hardcore boxing fans in the country haven't either.

Surely as a fan Taffy, you cannot be raptured with this opponent, especially after all the guff about Hopkins etc etc.
If true mate I think it is an awful fight but I am sick to death of the blinkered Bellew fans to be honest.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by leforge »

taffytoon wrote:
G0mez wrote:
taffytoon wrote:
Yeh because Bellew v Miranda is SOOOOOOOOoooo much better :lol: :lol: Another bitter and Delusional Bellew fan I see :zzz:
It is miles better. Miranda is proven quantity at world level - and whilst perhaps past his peak, at least we know what the guy even looks like.

Who is Simic ? I've never heard of the guy. And i bet 95% of hardcore boxing fans in the country haven't either.

Surely as a fan Taffy, you cannot be raptured with this opponent, especially after all the guff about Hopkins etc etc.
If true mate I think it is an awful fight but I am sick to death of the blinkered Bellew fans to be honest.
I bet Nathan has no much choice in who he fights at the moment.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by whiskey »

I like Clev, he was really going places with sky pulling for him. But these horrible, tedious WBO no-names must ruin a fighter's enthusiasm in camp.

Shumenov, , Chad Dawson, Cloud, Pascal, Hopkins, Diaconu, Chris Henry - the division has a few names. Gutneckct, Chilemba, Campillo.. Allan Green even.

And I didn't even mention Hopkins. 175lb has plenty of options if your a belt holder.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by leforge »

G0mez wrote:I like Clev, he was really going places with sky pulling for him. But these horrible, tedious WBO no-names must ruin a fighter's enthusiasm in camp.

Shumenov, , Chad Dawson, Cloud, Pascal, Hopkins, Diaconu, Chris Henry - the division has a few names. Gutneckct, Chilemba, Campillo.. Allan Green even.

And I didn't even mention Hopkins. 175lb has plenty of options if your a belt holder.
Would it be different if he was still fighting on sky its upto his promotor?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by whiskey »

leforge wrote:
G0mez wrote:I like Clev, he was really going places with sky pulling for him. But these horrible, tedious WBO no-names must ruin a fighter's enthusiasm in camp.

Shumenov, , Chad Dawson, Cloud, Pascal, Hopkins, Diaconu, Chris Henry - the division has a few names. Gutneckct, Chilemba, Campillo.. Allan Green even.

And I didn't even mention Hopkins. 175lb has plenty of options if your a belt holder.
Would it be different if he was still fighting on sky its upto his promotor?
When you own the channel you can air what you please. But when someone is buying your fight, they'll have a say on the matter I'm sure (eventually).
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Genuine question about Nathan Cleverly...

Post by leforge »

G0mez wrote:
leforge wrote:
G0mez wrote:I like Clev, he was really going places with sky pulling for him. But these horrible, tedious WBO no-names must ruin a fighter's enthusiasm in camp.

Shumenov, , Chad Dawson, Cloud, Pascal, Hopkins, Diaconu, Chris Henry - the division has a few names. Gutneckct, Chilemba, Campillo.. Allan Green even.

And I didn't even mention Hopkins. 175lb has plenty of options if your a belt holder.
Would it be different if he was still fighting on sky its upto his promotor?
When you own the channel you can air what you please. But when someone is buying your fight, they'll have a say on the matter I'm sure (eventually).
You would hope!
Post Reply