GreenLightning wrote:jessi wrote:TopGun wrote:Interesting to note that when I did my poll for Haye/Chisora the result was correct with majority 31% of the votes for rounds 1-5 Haye win.
Because all in all we are a very knowledgable forum !
Or was that because it was a more predictable result ?
Now you would think Mitchell v burns is a 50/50 fight but that's see what the poll results produce !
Mitchell being the underdog is fine by me as I'm going to win even more money !
why would you think that? what world level fighter has mitchell beat?
I would admit that burns has fought at a slightly higher level since they both fought Johansan, and burns has improved more too, I would say Murray and Prescott were his best results and there's a case they wernt world class themselves although they have both mixed it at world level, but then there's a case for most people not being world class just because they have mixed it (but lost).
I believe Kevin was a far superior amateur then Ricky and a more natural boxer, Ricky is better defensively but doesn't have a punch to get him out of trouble like Kevin does.
It's in my mind there toughest test on paper yet, but I feel this is all or nothing for kev, and he seems to be good when it's all on the line, Murray was a must win fight and he looked great, Prescott was a fight that everybody slates now, but at the time he was in with a big puncher when he didn't need to be, this fight is all or nothing for kev and that's when you can count on him !
your opinion of course but your reading too much into his display against Murray i think. Mighty Kev?....in your eyes maybe. Regardless, i see Burns having the edge. 
