Sturm V Geale

Post Reply
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Sturm V Geale

Post by 15829 »

Thought the scores where abit out i scored the fight 115-115 wouldn't argue with a with either fighter win by a round or 2
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by crusader »

I had it 115-114 Sturm.

I think that most rounds could've fairly gone either way.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Really close fight. I thought Geale done enough but you couldn't argue either way. The scores were way out. Geale showed he has a bit of class I thought he boxed well. Hard to see where Sturm goes. Talk of a fight vs Abraham.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by whiskey »

I thought it was a fairly tedious fight with no clear winner.

The winner (Geale) now has to face the regular WBA champion Golovkin.

He'll get split in half.
fightscorecollector
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 473
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by fightscorecollector »

collected so many scores for this fight and i have to say its the closest fight ive covered...i had it 114-114
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by earsjohn »

G0mez wrote:
The winner (Geale) now has to face the regular WBA champion Golovkin.
Really? I can't think of a single example of a WBA "Super" Champion fighting a WBA "Normal" Champion. The whole point of creating the Super belt was to earn two lots of sanctioning fees - can hardly see them looking to restrict their revenue streams by forcing this fight.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by forcefraser »

G0mez wrote:I thought it was a fairly tedious fight with no clear winner.

The winner (Geale) now has to face the regular WBA champion Golovkin.

He'll get split in half.
Geale is tougher than most people give him credit for. Golovkin would be a tough ask, but Geale's superior skills might get him through it.

I'd take Geale over anything UK has at middlewight.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by JamesH »

Agreed, just watched the rerun and and scored them even. Would have expected a home decision but pleased for Geale.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by Final round »

I had it 115-114 to Sturm but could have gone by a round either way or a draw.

Decent fight, Geale is a ball of energy shame he doesn't have the punch to match.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by pyenest77 »

I think Golovkin would destroy him. Although as the above poster says its never gonna happen. 2 sanctioning fees are better than 1!!
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by whiskey »

pyenest77 wrote:I think Golovkin would destroy him. Although as the above poster says its never gonna happen. 2 sanctioning fees are better than 1!!
Yep, expect an all-aussie Sam Soliman defence next for Geale.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Sturm V Geale

Post by stujones »

Always thought the minute Geale got the decision vs Sylvester that a rematch with Mundine would be on the Horizon. First fight was a good fight, and quite controvesial. Mundine still being arguably the biggest name in Aussie boxing - surely its HAS to happen - and it is no mark time gimmie for Geale - Mundine would be a worthy challenger.
Post Reply