smoggy7188 wrote:BERNARD HOPKINS EX @THEREALBHOP
@allegedly_tv stop using my name to promote ur BUM titleholder.. nate clevery.

dondada wrote:smoggy7188 wrote:BERNARD HOPKINS EX @THEREALBHOP
@allegedly_tv stop using my name to promote ur BUM titleholder.. nate clevery.
His trying the old... I offered Froch but he turned me down... like Froch would fight ClevG0mez wrote:I don't think Tony Bellew and Bernard Hopkins are colluding with each other to refute the contents of the press release.
It's the same as last time, quietly usher in the actual opponent - then litter the press release with disparaging comments about real fighters to deflect the focus from the quality of the challenger. To serve both as a cloak and and excuse.
We saw it with Karpency, we are seeing it now - and will see it on the next opponent.
The only thing I can't work out is whether Clev is swallowing it, or colluding with it. I'm starting to believe it's the latter now.
It's all well and good in front of an audience of 300,000 on Sky, it's keeps him in the public eye. But this is tucked away on a specialist channel. I can only assume the kitty isn't big enough for a £500k-£1m opponent and thus we have a £40k one.
dondada wrote:smoggy7188 wrote:BERNARD HOPKINS EX @THEREALBHOP
@allegedly_tv stop using my name to promote ur BUM titleholder.. nate clevery.
Good work, nice one. Of course, this goes no way to showing that Bob-Hope agreed terms and then pulled out.earsjohn wrote:For those who use Twitter, @allegedly_tv has recently tweeted in response to @therealbhop regarding the pull out claimed by Warren in the Clev-Uzelkov press statement "The main target was American great Bernard Hopkins but after I agreed terms with his promoter Golden Boy, he pulled out."
All Tweets by @allegedly_tv....
1 - (to B-Hop) maybe you should look at your past comments where you said you wanted to fight him?
2 - (to B-Hop) You said Jan 2nd Ring magazine online "I got two names that I've been scouting, and I've got tapes of them........
3 - (to B-Hop) ......I would like to unify the titles. I would like to fight the WBA guy [Shumenov]. That seems like somebody who likes to...
4 - (to B-Hop) ..fight. He's strong. The WBO guy from England [Cleverly,] he's been calling me out on certain websites."
5 - discussions were ongoing with Richard Schaefer over the fight as he confirmed in an interview in Feb....
6 - Richard Schaefer said,'I've talked to Bernard about Nathan and he said "Look I'm used to fighting younger guys.Just keep bringing them on"..
7 - ..'I went with Frank through the some numbers......But definitely, if everything goes well, I would very much like to make that fight.'
It's an horrific paper.whiteboy wrote:What is jeff Powell thinking of publishing fw's propaganda in the national press!!!! Horrific article in the mail
llamalew wrote:Just read this on Hopkins twitter
"@THEREALBHOP: @allegedly_tv after ur guy fight oct 27 we can get deal done!"
God post deserterDeserter wrote:Taffy, look at my previous posts and you can see I've always rated Cleverly. For that matter, I've always rated you as a poster.taffytoon wrote:Nice to see the Clev haters hate!!! He is fighting somebody far superior to Tony Bellew yet you would rather see a rematch![]()
![]()
![]()
And you call Clevs opponent a joke![]()
![]()
Thanks for the giggle
However, you're doing yourself no favours here. Nathan's career has stalled badly and matters are made worse when you've got his promoter making disputed claims in a poor attempt to legitimize the current state of affairs. I respect your loyalty, but you're trying to defend the indefensible at the moment and you'd be better off staying quiet on it rather than trying to reduce the issue to one of Clev 'haters' and bringing Bellew into it unnecessarily.
The reality is that Nathan has had a string of sub-standard opponents given his claim to be a world title holder and it's also hard to see how the guys he is facing are assisting his development should he eventually land a defining fight.
Powell is an absolute joke fair weather boxing writer who should retire. He's been spouting garbage for years with his cushy number jetting off to Vegas whenever there's a big time fight yet barely covers the grass roots of the sport.Dan Dares wrote:It's an horrific paper.whiteboy wrote:What is jeff Powell thinking of publishing fw's propaganda in the national press!!!! Horrific article in the mail
Totally agree about Powell, typical of the bigger (wannabe middle class) papers. They cover only the big fights, they all get a jolly off to Vegas for a holiday and a piss up, then there is absolutely no mention of boxing for the rest of the year.dve3333 wrote:Powell is an absolute joke fair weather boxing writer who should retire. He's been spouting garbage for years with his cushy number jetting off to Vegas whenever there's a big time fight yet barely covers the grass roots of the sport.Dan Dares wrote:It's an horrific paper.whiteboy wrote:What is jeff Powell thinking of publishing fw's propaganda in the national press!!!! Horrific article in the mail
Like Bellew was going to destroy him in 2Riddick Blowe wrote:lol, I love how Hopkins describes Cleverley as 'from England'. I think he did that with Calzaghe too. It's clearly just ignorance but it would be funny if he was doing it deliberately to try and wind him up.
If I was Hopkins, I would seriously consider actually taking this fight. Low risk and decent reward as Warren would promote it well. Cleverly would be Bernard's first stoppage victim since Oscar. He would just toy with the Welshman before stopping him.
Aye, because gasman is basing his whole argument solely on their next opponents, isn't he?The Dark Destroyer wrote:And Froch is fighting what leading SMW contender?gasman wrote:That is another rubbish fight for Cleverly - pure garbage matchmaking. This is the kind of guff what made Sky rethink their contracts, at least now they have a proper promoter in Hearn who will put on the right fights, not mismatch after mismatch.
As for Powell, I have to say, he was one of the few who print hacks who set aside gushy patriotism and called the Olympics right i.e. Joshua-Savon et al. Fair dues to him, definitely went up in my estimation after that.
How anyone would criticise Froch after his run of fights is beyond me. I bet the Nottingham show will still be a top card. I'll take Hearn's shows every time over Warrens. I am in no hurry for a return of PPV British Title fights or half empty leisure centres for crap cards.The Dark Destroyer wrote:And Froch is fighting what leading SMW contender?gasman wrote:That is another rubbish fight for Cleverly - pure garbage matchmaking. This is the kind of guff what made Sky rethink their contracts, at least now they have a proper promoter in Hearn who will put on the right fights, not mismatch after mismatch.
As for Powell, I have to say, he was one of the few who print hacks who set aside gushy patriotism and called the Olympics right i.e. Joshua-Savon et al. Fair dues to him, definitely went up in my estimation after that.
Eh? Brook is trying to get an IBF title shot. He and his next opponent - Saldivia - are the top two rated in their division (two and three).The Dark Destroyer wrote: What about Kell Brook's next opponent? Hardly a leading light at welterweight is he? Is he even ranked in the top ten of any sanctioning body?