Jess Willard

Post Reply
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Jess Willard

Post by HomicideHenry »

Was he the strongest heavyweight champion of all time? As the lore goes, Tom Jones discovered Willard on his farm in Kansas throwing 500 pound bales of cotton onto a wagon and thought to himself that a man that strong and big could beat Jack Johnson. Is this just hoopla, or do you think that Willard does warrant being the strongest boxing champion of all time?
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Jess Willard

Post by dempseyfire »

I think it's impossible to gauge strength fighter by fighter. Generally one could label Willard as one of the strongest HW champions of all time in terms of total physical strength. Foreman and Carnera would be up there as well.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Jess Willard

Post by Cap »

HomicideHenry wrote:Was he the strongest heavyweight champion of all time? As the lore goes, Tom Jones discovered Willard on his farm in Kansas throwing 500 pound bales of cotton onto a wagon and thought to himself that a man that strong and big could beat Jack Johnson. Is this just hoopla, or do you think that Willard does warrant being the strongest boxing champion of all time?
500 pound bales of hay? Who in their right mind, back then would've packed up bales weighing 500 pounds? Sounds like malarkey to me. Willard was no Louis Cyr. Heck, I would've put my money on Jim Jeffries in a wrasslin match.

Cap
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Jess Willard

Post by The Great John L »

Cap wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:Was he the strongest heavyweight champion of all time? As the lore goes, Tom Jones discovered Willard on his farm in Kansas throwing 500 pound bales of cotton onto a wagon and thought to himself that a man that strong and big could beat Jack Johnson. Is this just hoopla, or do you think that Willard does warrant being the strongest boxing champion of all time?
500 pound bales of hay? Who in their right mind, back then would've packed up bales weighing 500 pounds? Sounds like malarkey to me. Willard was no Louis Cyr. Heck, I would've put my money on Jim Jeffries in a wrasslin match.

Cap
That was my initial reaction as well, but when I re-read the post it states 500 lb bales of cotton. A quick check of the net and the standard weight of a bale of cotton is 500 lbs, and that's probably been consistent for a long time since that's how the commodity is priced.

Of course, I would suspect that the story is probably inflated, however, it doesn't seem to be a stretch for a 6-6 250 lb guy who works on a ranch to be able to lift a bale of cotton onto a wagon. Well, at least a wagon that was riding slightly low.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Jess Willard

Post by Cap »

Funny. Never thought of Kansas as cotton country. That's why I immediately assumed they were talking hay. I remember riding with the horse drawn hay-mow as a boy, and no way did they bale hay 500-lbs at a time. :D

Cap
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Jess Willard

Post by The Great John L »

Cap wrote:Funny. Never thought of Kansas as cotton country. That's why I immediately assumed they were talking hay. I remember riding with the horse drawn hay-mow as a boy, and no way did they bale hay 500-lbs at a time. :D

Cap
Maybe he was lifting the cotton onto a wagon at the train station in order to deliver it to the mill that the ranch owner operated.

Okay, I'm trying to make this work.
Chuck1052
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4285
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 22:08

Re: Jess Willard

Post by Chuck1052 »

I wouldn't know what a regular bale of hay would weigh when Jess Willard was a young man, but such a bale usually weighed forty-to-fifty pounds about forty years ago. A five-hundred bale would have been very bulky and heavy, especially at a time when there was less mechanization. Heck! It must've been much, much more difficult to bale hay one hundred years ago.

- Chuck Johnston
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Jess Willard

Post by The Great John L »

Chuck1052 wrote:I wouldn't know what a regular bale of hay would weigh when Jess Willard was a young man, but such a bale usually weighed forty-to-fifty pounds about forty years ago. A five-hundred bale would have been very bulky and heavy, especially at a time when there was less mechanization. Heck! It must've been much, much more difficult to bale hay one hundred years ago.

- Chuck Johnston
The OP said a 500 lb bale of cotton not hay.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Jess Willard

Post by Cap »

The Great John L wrote:
Chuck1052 wrote:I wouldn't know what a regular bale of hay would weigh when Jess Willard was a young man, but such a bale usually weighed forty-to-fifty pounds about forty years ago. A five-hundred bale would have been very bulky and heavy, especially at a time when there was less mechanization. Heck! It must've been much, much more difficult to bale hay one hundred years ago.

- Chuck Johnston
The OP said a 500 lb bale of cotton not hay.
Cotton in Kansas? :D
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Jess Willard

Post by The Great John L »

Post Reply