Kevin Mitchell why

fanofboxing
Super Middleweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 13:52

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by fanofboxing »

dondada wrote:
fanofboxing wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Murray is a clubfighter who eats punches. Mitchell beating him proved very little. To take shots from Prescott and Johanssen and then fall apart like that shows a clear and definite decline in punch resistance. A lot of you seem to be in denial.
we think maybe you are dillusional, why has no one asked the question why and what was the burns gym raided for, you cant grow power unless its fed with something ? im not saying mitchell was at he's best but no way is burns a banger :bag: rumour is he's been caught before for enhancements :oo
Hello BoxRob :wave:
No not BoxRob, is that the scope of your thinking power ? have been reading the comments he has wrote and can see you dont like critism or honesty tho :oops:
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by stevieb_8006 »

hi boxrob.

seriously mate, r u vinny mitchell? Did billy nelson shag ur mum or something? Ur obsessed.

First proper cyber stalker ive encountered.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by Coco »

Isn't it a banning offence to create multiple user names?
fanofboxing
Super Middleweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 13:52

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by fanofboxing »

danconnollyeire wrote:
TJ77 wrote:I just watched the post fight presser both boxers really showed class i hope Kevin isnt shot i think british boxing is better with him in it.
Might be a good shout for him to leave Fwank though be a good addition to Hennesy's or Matchroom's stables.
He dispatched a more confident Murray much sooner than Rios did... he still has world level potential if active/on form/head in the right place
x2 and a good solid team behind him :wave:
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by stevieb_8006 »

Coco wrote:Isn't it a banning offence to create multiple user names?

it should be. what a truly sad kunt this guy is. "im not boxrob actually, i just hold the exact same grudges against the exact same people, typing exactly the same slanderous accusations in the exact same manner"
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by Deserter »

stevieb_8006 wrote:
Coco wrote:Isn't it a banning offence to create multiple user names?

it should be. what a truly sad kunt this guy is. "im not boxrob actually, i just hold the exact same grudges against the exact same people, typing exactly the same slanderous accusations in the exact same manner"
:lol: :lol: :TU:
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by Asterix »

Coco wrote:Isn't it a banning offence to create multiple user names?
Yes, it is. :TU:
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by dondada »

stevieb_8006 wrote:
Coco wrote:Isn't it a banning offence to create multiple user names?

it should be. what a truly sad kunt this guy is. "im not boxrob actually, i just hold the exact same grudges against the exact same people, typing exactly the same slanderous accusations in the exact same manner"
:lol: :OhYes:
BOXROB2
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 01 Oct 2012, 17:25

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by BOXROB2 »

:wave: I'm back, so I got banned because I speak truth. Why is it Mr Admin that someone can have an opinion on something and you ban them? Not all opinions are the same. We all have difference of opinion. Thats what makes the forum going dont you think?
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by stevieb_8006 »

BOXROB2 wrote::wave: I'm back, so I got banned because I speak truth. Why is it Mr Admin that someone can have an opinion on something and you ban them? Not all opinions are the same. We all have difference of opinion. Thats what makes the forum going dont you think?
Mate,. U r "that guy". Don't u see it? Look how everyone's laughing at u.

Ur either very young and need to grow up a little, or a little bit simple.

I'm sure deep down ur not a bad person, just a bit of a nincompoop. Have a word with yourself.

The fake name was painful. I know u'll deny it, but we can all see.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by Giancarlo »

fanofboxing wrote:
Its not a rumour he's gym was raided, Fact read the papers, and im sure it wasnt raided for street drugs :!:
Hi BoxNob, and welcome back!

:wave:
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Kevin Mitchell why

Post by danconnollyeire »

BOXROB2 wrote::wave: I'm back, so I got banned because I speak truth. Why is it Mr Admin that someone can have an opinion on something and you ban them? Not all opinions are the same. We all have difference of opinion. Thats what makes the forum going dont you think?
Welcome back... we've missed you Robert Mitchell. Kevin's clearly been out of training now so you've had too much on your plate with all the stalking, obsessive wanking and trying to come up with rumours to 'put people off' their game.

The serious obsession is getting worse. You disapear and the first thing you comment on when you return is Kevin Mitchell. This is why I asked if you was autistic, this obsessed world you live in when you constantly think about Kevin Mitchell is extremely worrying. Some good advice would be to start actively looking for a job, get a real hobby (football, golf, painting), go out and socialise with real people... good luck :TU: :TU: :TU:
Post Reply