Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post Reply
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post by Rover »

Guzman wasn't the slickster at 122 that he's become at higher weights. He was more of a puncher. Tossup fight. (And these two were both beltholders simultaneously until Guzman moved up.)
I'll go with Guzman, but I'm not that confident about it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post by Counter-puncher »

Guzman would punch holes in him
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post by Rover »

Counter-puncher wrote:Guzman would punch holes in him
Like he did with Beltran?
The problem with Guzman is that his resume at 122 consists of:
Oliva (who?)
Beltran (decent fighter whom Guzman decisioned in a rather ordinary performance)
Sanchez (coming off 2+ year layoff due to eye injury)
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post by Counter-puncher »

Larios is made for Guzman stylewise IMO. walking straight at Guzman, at 122lbs, is a recipe to get your head knocked off.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Larios/Guzman at 122.

Post by Rover »

Counter-puncher wrote:Larios is made for Guzman stylewise IMO. walking straight at Guzman, at 122lbs, is a recipe to get your head knocked off.
The only quality guy Guzman ever stopped was Sanchez. Problem that he had been off for over two years with an eye injury.
Larios also could box--and he took many hard shots from Vazquez.
Post Reply