Khan on Ringside.

fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by fasteddie »

There is no heaven, scientifically proven.[/quote]

:evil:
I'm so offended I 'may' go and burn down an embassy.[/quote]

or a regal?
winkveron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 08 Dec 2008, 12:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by winkveron »

This is a brilliant thread.

Safeerah vs. Everyone is top of the bill, then Heaven and Bunny also feature high on the undercard.

I get the impression that Safeerah would argue in an empty room.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by twenty six »

Is there an echo in here ? :TU:
macaca
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1296
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 07:49

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by macaca »

TheCobra wrote:Kell can bang enough to surely test Khan's chin, Khan has the speed/skill to maybe make Kell look daft at times.
YUP
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

[quote="winkveron"]This is a brilliant thread.

Safeerah vs. Everyone is top of the bill, then Heaven and Bunny also feature high on the undercard.

I get the impression that Safeerah would argue in an empty room.[/quote]

You looking a me? You looking at me? Huh? Well I don't see anyone else here, you lookin at me?
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by danconnollyeire »

palooka wrote:
winkveron wrote:This is a brilliant thread.

Safeerah vs. Everyone is top of the bill, then Heaven and Bunny also feature high on the undercard.

I get the impression that Safeerah would argue in an empty room.[/quote]

You looking a me? You looking at me? Huh? Well I don't see anyone else here, you lookin at me?
I urge you not to argue with him. Disagree with his opinion makes you automatically racist!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

I'm not a racist - I hate everyone the same.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by Final round »

fasteddie wrote:There is no heaven, scientifically proven.
:evil:
I'm so offended I 'may' go and burn down an embassy.[/quote]

or a regal?[/quote]

I'll burn them all.

Image
MecnunK
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 14 Sep 2003, 01:40

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by MecnunK »

Not matter what you say about Khan , he brings out the worst in people :D
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by safeerah »

danconnollyeire wrote:
palooka wrote:
winkveron wrote:This is a brilliant thread.

Safeerah vs. Everyone is top of the bill, then Heaven and Bunny also feature high on the undercard.

I get the impression that Safeerah would argue in an empty room.[/quote]

You looking a me? You looking at me? Huh? Well I don't see anyone else here, you lookin at me?
I urge you not to argue with him. Disagree with his opinion makes you automatically racist!


No mate the word is debate, I debate, but some people are not clever enough to debate, know what I mean ? So I educate them, Mugabi has the intelligence though.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by safeerah »

palooka wrote:
winkveron wrote:This is a brilliant thread.

Safeerah vs. Everyone is top of the bill, then Heaven and Bunny also feature high on the undercard.

I get the impression that Safeerah would argue in an empty room.[/quote]

You looking a me? You looking at me? Huh? Well I don't see anyone else here, you lookin at me?
I strongly object to your remarks on the empty room, never been in am empty room in my life, bar the bathroom, you see unlike you, I have friends, Taxi Driver.

You need all of you to match me in a debate, individually your not clever enough, but I can teach you if you like 500 hundred an hour lol.
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by safeerah »

palooka wrote:I'm not a racist - I hate everyone the same.
Sad person. I don't hate anyone, but I do feel sorry for some, catch my drift.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

safeerah wrote:
palooka wrote:I'm not a racist - I hate everyone the same.
Sad person. I don't hate anyone, but I do feel sorry for some, catch my drift.
I was joking safeerah, take it easy
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by safeerah »

palooka wrote:
safeerah wrote:
palooka wrote:I'm not a racist - I hate everyone the same.
Sad person. I don't hate anyone, but I do feel sorry for some, catch my drift.
I was joking safeerah, take it easy
So was I Palooka.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

:TU:
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by Roars Like Me »

palooka wrote:I'm not a racist - I hate everyone the same.
Either that or you are a 'complete racist' :OhYes:
jimcook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 842
Joined: 28 Jun 2005, 14:05

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by jimcook »

safeerah wrote:

No mate the word is debate, I debate, but some people are not clever enough to debate, know what I mean ? So I educate them, Mugabi has the intelligence though.
[/quote][/quote]






you certainly are a master debator. and im sure mugabi and yourself have similar levels of misplaced faith in what passes in your world as intelligence, but to me you are just a pair of arseholes. i try and skip past most of what you say , cos its worthless, but sometimes im forced to read it as its part of the context for the thread.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

jimcook wrote:
safeerah wrote:

No mate the word is debate, I debate, but some people are not clever enough to debate, know what I mean ? So I educate them, Mugabi has the intelligence though.
[/quote]






you certainly are a master debator. and im sure mugabi and yourself have similar levels of misplaced faith in what passes in your world as intelligence, but to me you are just a pair of arseholes. i try and skip past most of what you say , cos its worthless, but sometimes im forced to read it as its part of the context for the thread.[/quote]

I'm sure I've been called a 'master debater' loads of times
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by danconnollyeire »

palooka wrote:
jimcook wrote:
safeerah wrote:

No mate the word is debate, I debate, but some people are not clever enough to debate, know what I mean ? So I educate them, Mugabi has the intelligence though.





you certainly are a master debator. and im sure mugabi and yourself have similar levels of misplaced faith in what passes in your world as intelligence, but to me you are just a pair of arseholes. i try and skip past most of what you say , cos its worthless, but sometimes im forced to read it as its part of the context for the thread.[/quote]

I'm sure I've been called a 'master debater' loads of times[/quote]

No you are hearing wrong... you are the master bater
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

Thanks for clearing that up for me dan :TU:
Last edited by palooka on 12 Oct 2012, 11:11, edited 1 time in total.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13453
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by jameswilson »

palooka wrote:Thanks for clearing that up for me dan :doh:
You'll have to forgive dan he has a habit of missing the completely bleeding obvious sometimes.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

jameswilson wrote:
palooka wrote:Thanks for clearing that up for me dan :doh:
You'll have to forgive dan he has a habit of missing the completely bleeding obvious sometimes.
he's a good lad, gets stuck in
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by danconnollyeire »

palooka wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
palooka wrote:Thanks for clearing that up for me dan :doh:
You'll have to forgive dan he has a habit of missing the completely bleeding obvious sometimes.
he's a good lad, gets stuck in
I got it... it was clearly obvious hence me making its more obvious!! :bow: :bow: :bow:
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by danconnollyeire »

This has got to be the most epic thread of all time by the way

We can't critise Khan for his ludacris stories... look what it's resulted in!!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Khan on Ringside.

Post by palooka »

It was all Jim :salut:
Post Reply