JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

mcato
Cruiserweight
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 May 2011, 13:17

JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by mcato »

Deagle actually looked decent. We might not like him but for a fighter who has been inactive for so long he fought well against a good fighter
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Awful scoring. I thought Degale looked very very average.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by jBacca »

Degale looked good in spurts but his opponent was a machine and Chunky obviously goosed early (inactivity).

Still think Degale is a quality fighter.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Matt W »

He puts shots together well but his defence is awful. He should forget about going anywhere near Froch.

And Mick Hennessy is talking some shite...
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Final round »

DeGale looked ragged at times to me, inactivity obviously taking it's toll but he seemed to lack pop in his punches.
World class performance? I don't think so Mick
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by hurlock »

He didn't need that after such a lengthy lay off. The kid could of beat him on fitness tonight I was abit worried but degale is tough & takes too many which may catch up with him.
Hennessy couldnt guide a Labrador degale is in deep now!
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by loaded_gloves »

He takes too many punches. His defence seems poor. Difficult to imagine him winning at world level. And I mean world super six style level, not 'world' WBO comedy level.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Final round »

mcdonnell the right trainer for the job?
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by jBacca »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Final round wrote:mcdonnell the right trainer for the job?
No.
+2

From what I've seen, he feeds Degale's ego. McDonnell has been embarrassing in pressers etc. Degale needs someone who can ground him.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13481
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by jameswilson »

He could be very good as an in and out fighter. His speed is really impressive at times. But yeah the old defence aint great and he needs to improve his power at this level if he is going to kick on a level. But considering he has been inactive and has problems outside the ring (with the promotional change) I think we can forgive him that. Also good to see he came across pretty well in the interview and is gonna be active.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by hurlock »

His face shows the redness from shots he takes & it was from the outset.degale I think is a real talent & needs the right team around him to achieve
potnoodle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 130
Joined: 08 May 2009, 08:34

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by potnoodle »

Personally I thought Degale bosses it? Well done Kit Kat
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by mrbassie »

I honestly think he just likes being in a fight, doesn't ming getting hit. My knock on him is he forgets to jab.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by hurlock »

mrbassie wrote:I honestly think he just likes being in a fight, doesn't ming getting hit. My knock on him is he forgets to jab.
Great point it's his biggest problem
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Final round »

jBacca wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Final round wrote:mcdonnell the right trainer for the job?
No.
+2

From what I've seen, he feeds Degale's ego. McDonnell has been embarrassing in pressers etc. Degale needs someone who can ground him.
yeah I'm not sure either after the early promise DeGales showed his technique seems on the decline to me, it could be the step up in opposition as well though. I thought McDonnell was supposed to be Mr Fitness but DeGale looked like he was struggling with the pace early on.
hhaehre
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6477
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 07:26

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by hhaehre »

DeGale is a pretty talented guy but he has no power and I also question his ring generalship. Against Mohoumadi he made it as hard a fight as it could possibly be by allowing a fairly average fighter to rough him up pretty good on the ropes. Maybe the layoff caused him to have stamina problems but with world class fighters he won't get away with laying on the ropes taking shots like he did with Mohoumadi.
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Newport Daz »

I enjoyed the fight. The guy he was fighting was no euro bum, but a really fit and pretty skilled opponent. A guy who's fought once in a year could have done without a guy that was so fit, but Degale will be better for it. It's one thing getting fit, but Degale needs to get "match fit", when he does he'll be top draw. Some of his combination punching, movement and ring generalship were excellent, I just think his match fitness let him down at times, which is understandable

Look forward to seeing his next fight.
andeeholden
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 167
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 22:28

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by andeeholden »

Was really impressed with Degale's speed and skill, although he did take too many shots. I thought the judges scored it too heavily in Degale's favour although the victor was never in doubt.

He seems to have matured a lot since winning the Gold medal which makes him far more likeable in my eyes.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by m1kee50 »

It will be a shame if we never see the frenchman fight again, too often a good losing performance seems to drop them off the radar of our promoters. I know it would be ambitious but I would put Buglioni in there with him I think it would be a good test.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by rob h »

The frenchman was great, tough as nails.

I was impressed with Degale though tonight even though he was scrappy. His combinations were eye catching, very quick good shot selection and I liked the grit he showed.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Finn »

he did well considering his career issues and long time out of the ring, my only concern is that he seems to lack enough power to take out the better class of opponents.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5493
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by forcefraser »

I thought it was a great fight. Either the French lad is one hard case or Degale does not hit hard enough.

If he can`t keep this guy off him, imagine what a top class operator with a punch could do to Degale.

He needs to get more distance and put more venom into his shots. I can`t believe that one judge gave it to Degale 119- 109. Shocking.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by Adamj1987 »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Awful scoring. I thought Degale looked very very average.
i must agree. the judge who gave degale 11 rounds should be ashamed. he looked good in spurts but looked like the fitness wasnt there with the rope leaning
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by whiskey »

I think Frenchie gave Degale a good fight and it's likely what he needs right now.

But Degale never holds his feet and is too happy to fall back to the ropes. I don't recall him doing that in his early days - is it since he lost ?

He looked like getting halted against Wilchewzki and scraped through on a MD. He looked no better last night either.

The back-slappers fed his ego and he admits it did. But can't help but think this new PR approach is still contrived and he still thinks he's the goods.

He looked fleshy, lacked authority and his power didn't do much. His face was sore after just 1 round which points to a bad defence.

I think Hennessy won't gift him wins, I think Mick will match him tough myself - it's up to Degale now whether he sinks or swims.

I hope he swims, but have a bad feeling whether he will.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: JAMES DEGEALE V MAHAMDIA

Post by tear up »

this is my story for degale great boxer but why take so many shots on the ropes he s a class act use it and stop tryin to be mayweather
Post Reply