Kell Brook

SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Kell Brook

Post by SOUTHPAW »

tear up wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
tear up wrote:Ill up set a few people ere all ingle fighter s r on top fighters they shit them self s when it gets hard
I bet you can't find one who would quit against Jason Booth.

:TU:
Fxck me another one cone s out the wood work like Iv said before stupid body builders diet s don't do you well no energy looked the part but was t the part and bet I could make you quit in a round
Its a good job he hasnt done a stupid body builders diet then.......oh and steve molitor
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook

Post by twenty six »

No good whinging now Tear Up you brought it on.
So already it's all Ingle fighters except Rhodes, Thaxton.
Can't be arsed to give any more examples.
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Kell Brook

Post by SOUTHPAW »

twenty six wrote:No good whinging now Tear Up you brought it on.
So already it's all Ingle fighters except Rhodes, Thaxton.
Can't be arsed to give any more examples.
:TU:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Kell Brook

Post by tear up »

No whingen off me twenty 6 you wanna get ya tongue out of Ryan s arse and just said how I seen it monitor don't need to make excuses beat me up
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Kell Brook

Post by rhino222 »

brook looked in excellent shape at the weigh in today. he could not have been prepared better, personally i think brook will win inside 6 rounds...and it could be earlier!!
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook

Post by twenty six »

Michael, Michael,
Not a very grown up response.
In fact a little like your boxing - predictable.
For the record I have never said anything about the Molitor fight (he isn't a MONITOR).
My gripe with you was onefold - your slagging of Ingle boxers.
Typically when brought to task you can only turn to insults.
Sad.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Kell Brook

Post by tear up »

[quote="twenty six"]Michael, Michael,
Not a very grown up response.
In fact a little like your boxing - predictable.
For the record I have never said anything about the Molitor fight (he isn't a MONITOR).
My gripe with you was onefold - your slagging of Ingle boxers.
Typically when brought to task you can only turn to insults.
Sad.[/quote
Only said what I thought twenty 6
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Kell Brook

Post by tear up »

Wow didn't expect kell to blitze him like that well done
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook

Post by mickey1975 »

tear up wrote:Wow didn't expect kell to blitze him like that well done
Why? The guy had already been done in a round by a bloke stopped by Kell's last opponent.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Kell Brook

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Wonder if Hearn will try get Alexander over now for the title shot. By the sounds of it the Alexander-Bailey fight was an absolute shocker. Alexander has a tendency to put on really shit performances.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Kell Brook

Post by Finn »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:Wonder if Hearn will try get Alexander over now for the title shot. By the sounds of it the Alexander-Bailey fight was an absolute shocker. Alexander has a tendency to put on really shit performances.
I dont think its always alexanders fault his fights have been boring; baileys pretty boring anyway apart from the ko's, however alexander does have a tendency to stay out of range and flick out a jab which doesnt have a chance of connecting with his opponent. It would be a good name to not only get kel a belt but the recognition in the US.
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5009
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Kell Brook

Post by Glass Joe »

Brook opponent was rubbish anyone in the top 20 welterweights in this country would have beaten him. Hopefully he can home advantage against Alexander
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Kell Brook

Post by dondada »

Glass Joe wrote:Brook opponent was rubbish anyone in the top 20 welterweights in this country would have beaten him.
Absolutely right, Joe. I remember thinking as Brook landed that uppercut, "Blimey, this lad's absolutely made for Young Mutley."
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

Well done Kell :TU: Devon Alexander ''it going be Hagler Hearns baby''.Then Khans chins coming off :KO:
Top performance and still people talk about the opponent ?Well they wont be able to say it about your next fight will they.
Carson Jones :salut:
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Kell Brook

Post by TJ77 »

tear up wrote:Wow didn't expect kell to blitze him like that well done
Praise indeed :salut:
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook

Post by jessi »

Khan will smash him
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Kell Brook

Post by rhino222 »

rhino222 wrote:brook looked in excellent shape at the weigh in today. he could not have been prepared better, personally i think brook will win inside 6 rounds...and it could be earlier!!
i should have gone to the bookies!!!!
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Kell Brook

Post by broomy7s »

Can't see Brook vs Alexander happening tbh. Can't see Alexander coming here and surely if Brook went to the states Golden boy would want some sort of deal on winners next few fights. Hearn already struggling to fill sky dates with stable he can Ill afford 1 of his star fighters fighting elsewhere.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook

Post by twenty six »

Broomy,
You're not suggesting that the Promotor's needs take precedent over the boxer's career are you ?
Perish the thought.
They always act in the best interests of the boxer.
:o :TU:
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook

Post by twenty six »

Rhino,
You and 200k others !
Don't think that was a testing forcast tbh.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Kell Brook

Post by whiskey »

jessi wrote:Khan will smash him
Well, he is 'one of the best offensive fighters in the world'

If Rachid Drilzane (a man with zero ko's) the shell of Michael Gomez, Willie Limond can chin him - and Prescott and Garcia can blow him away - then I've no doubt a 147lb Kell Brook in last night's condition, would having him sacking his coach and heading 'back 'te drawin bord' in no time at all.

(Sorry Jessi)
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook

Post by jessi »

G0mez wrote:
jessi wrote:Khan will smash him
Well, he is 'one of the best offensive fighters in the world'

If Rachid Drilzane (a man with zero ko's) the shell of Michael Gomez, Willie Limond can chin him - and Prescott and Garcia can blow him away - then I've no doubt a 147lb Kell Brook in last night's condition, would having him sacking his coach and heading 'back 'te drawin bord' in no time at all.

(Sorry Jessi)
Apart from Garcia and Prescott he took good shots and got up to win, khan gets hit badly because he chooses to trade, his still young and still learning, who has brook really beat ?
He would be dazed by the very first onslaught by khan, his speed is in a different league !
Stick brook in with alexander and let's see what his really made of, but if the khan fight happened early next year I believe khan would dance around him !
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Kell Brook

Post by dondada »

jessi wrote:if the khan fight happened early next year I believe khan would dance around him !
Aye, he might. But he should have danced round lots of fellas and, for reasons best known to himself, chose not to.

I'd fancy Khan if he boxed to his potential but if he started being daft again, as he often is, Brook would bat him like sixmens.
Abbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 699
Joined: 02 Jun 2005, 16:36

Re: Kell Brook

Post by Abbo »

if Khan vs Brook did take place, where do you think it would be held?
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Kell Brook

Post by jessi »

dondada wrote:
jessi wrote:if the khan fight happened early next year I believe khan would dance around him !
Aye, he might. But he should have danced round lots of fellas and, for reasons best known to himself, chose not to.

I'd fancy Khan if he boxed to his potential but if he started being daft again, as he often is, Brook would bat him like sixmens.
I agree he should of danced around alot of fellas too, but isn't that why his so exciting to watch ? Both brook and khan have proved they have alot of heart, and the two ko's khan has been on the end of would of knocked anyone out ! I know he shouldn't of been in the position he was in to get ko'd in the first place but he is still only 25 and learning, of course he has to box clever from now onwards and we won't know that until the situation of a war arises next, but as much as I like brook he is still a novice on the world scene until he proves me wrong I'm going to side with khan ! It won't happen untill khan goes to 147 anyway, Eddie may talk about a big show between them next summer but who knows ? It might take a year or two yet.
Post Reply