I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.
I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.
Godding Vs Jakiewicz
-
Peter Parker
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:30
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
-
Peter Parker
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:30
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
Just another point if you land more punches too.
-
Looking On
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
Peter Parker wrote:I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.
I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.
So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??
Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises
-
Peter Parker
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:30
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
MongLooking On wrote:Peter Parker wrote:I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.
I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.
So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??
Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
He PMs me regularlyCongleton wrote:PIGG as in PIGG Wilson, have you had that tw*t here as well?Peter Parker wrote:PIGG lolsweetscience wrote:what was your old name on here Peter Parker ?
He comes on ESB all the time just posting PIGG with a silly PIGG smiley, he's been banned numerous times but keeps coming back.
I thought it was an ESB disease, I'm dismayed to hear it's infected this place too
HATE THE PIGG!!
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
mmm thats 3 others calling you a trollPeter Parker wrote:MongLooking On wrote:
So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??
Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
mmm I just got a PMCongleton wrote:You must be a friend of the PIGG?danconnollyeire wrote: He PMs me regularly
The peado is backCongleton wrote:PIGG
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
Whatever PIG hahadavidas wrote:Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.
-
Scorby Tuttle
- Heavyweight

Re: Godding Vs Jakiewicz
Give it a rest with this PIGG business Dan.sweetscience wrote:Whatever PIG hahadavidas wrote:Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.