Groves v Johnson

dsimpson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:19

Groves v Johnson

Post by dsimpson »

A little promo for the upcoming fight on the 15th:

http://youtu.be/Fwjedv7mWWg


Proper test for Groves this one. It's only 18 months ago that Johnson dropped a MD to Froch. Watch the 8th round of that one back - he puts Froch under some serious pressure:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXRbQrJU ... ure=relmfu

I think we'll see Groves tested in this one.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by orbtastic »

Is this fight definitely on?
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by TopGun »

I'll believe it when I see it, still don't think this fight will happen!
dsimpson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:19

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by dsimpson »

Yeah, it's definitely on. Why?
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by mfc_se15 »

dsimpson wrote:Yeah, it's definitely on. Why?

I think people are probably asking because its Warren promoting and secondly when the fight was announced I think on the same day Johnson gave a few interviews saying nothing has been signed yet or something along those lines.
dsimpson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:19

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by dsimpson »

mfc_se15 wrote:
dsimpson wrote:Yeah, it's definitely on. Why?

I think people are probably asking because its Warren promoting and secondly when the fight was announced I think on the same day Johnson gave a few interviews saying nothing has been signed yet or something along those lines.
:OhYes:
Ah, ok. Well it's definitely on as far as I know.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Counter-puncher »

dsimpson wrote:
mfc_se15 wrote:
dsimpson wrote:Yeah, it's definitely on. Why?

I think people are probably asking because its Warren promoting and secondly when the fight was announced I think on the same day Johnson gave a few interviews saying nothing has been signed yet or something along those lines.
:OhYes:
Ah, ok. Well it's definitely on as far as I know.

Johnson is about 82 and his elbows are made of glass, so I wouldn't hold your breath
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Guys, I heard TBA is looking really good in training.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by whiskey »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys, I heard TBA is looking really good in training.
:D
vxrandall
Super Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Nov 2012, 16:35

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by vxrandall »

will depend whether enough tickets have been sold to cover venue cost

with new opponent for burns likely to even more guff than walsh im guessing it'll soon become clear that there will be a shortfall on sales vs costs and fighter purses and bill will get canned

just a hunch
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Cyclops »

If it happens a solid opponent and a potential banana skin. Good fight. Does it have a venue named yet?
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Dan Dares »

Can't see it happening for a a few reasons
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by lillywhite14 »

Objectivism wrote:Am I the only one who feels a little uncomfortable with this fight? Johnson's well on the slide and the Paul Smith win apart Groves isn't a one punch banger so I could see the old boy get a systematic beating in going the full distance.

How come the Board are permitting this when Botha was knocked back for Fury recently?
Johnson will have more left in his tank when he is 60 than what Botha has.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by ashedward »

clopixolacuphase wrote:If it happens a solid opponent and a potential banana skin. Good fight. Does it have a venue named yet?
Yep i hope it happens,it is scheduled for the Excell
Terrrrry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 519
Joined: 06 May 2010, 21:52

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Terrrrry »

clopixolacuphase wrote:If it happens a solid opponent and a potential banana skin. Good fight. Does it have a venue named yet?
ExCel, London.

Not sure how much Johnson has left, haven't seen him since the Bute fight. Rumour has it he's looked a bit shot in his last fight or two. If he has anything left he'll be a great opponent for GG, a potential banana skin.

Johnson will be allowed to fight over here past the age of 40 due to the fact he's challenging Groves for his Commonwealth title, I think.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Final round »

Terrrrry wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote:If it happens a solid opponent and a potential banana skin. Good fight. Does it have a venue named yet?
ExCel, London.

Not sure how much Johnson has left, haven't seen him since the Bute fight. Rumour has it he's looked a bit shot in his last fight or two. If he has anything left he'll be a great opponent for GG, a potential banana skin.

Johnson will be allowed to fight over here past the age of 40 due to the fact he's challenging Groves for his Commonwealth title, I think.
Johnson went the distance against Froch and Bute in 2011, apparently looked tired against Fonfara earlier this year but even then he's better than anyone Groves has fought up to now and is a decent step up in opposition imo.
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Shambles »

Objectivism wrote:Am I the only one who feels a little uncomfortable with this fight? Johnson's well on the slide and the Paul Smith win apart Groves isn't a one punch banger so I could see the old boy get a systematic beating in going the full distance.

How come the Board are permitting this when Botha was knocked back for Fury recently?

A completely different situation. You're comparing Johnson, who still has something to give, with Botha who is pretty much a spent force.

In my opinion, Johnson will gove Groves a good fight, it wont be as one sided as you think.
vxrandall
Super Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Nov 2012, 16:35

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by vxrandall »

Shambles wrote:
Objectivism wrote:Am I the only one who feels a little uncomfortable with this fight? Johnson's well on the slide and the Paul Smith win apart Groves isn't a one punch banger so I could see the old boy get a systematic beating in going the full distance.

How come the Board are permitting this when Botha was knocked back for Fury recently?

A completely different situation. You're comparing Johnson, who still has something to give, with Botha who is pretty much a spent force.

In my opinion, Johnson will gove Groves a good fight, it wont be as one sided as you think.
so ...hands up whose got a ticket then? :-?

oh wait..there is another show on the week before and i think i might have one for that instead. plus there is the ppv for manny v jmm IV and its coming up to christmas and oh my gosh....

i might just have to give it a miss i guess. remind me...its the mysteriously injury prone kid against the old fella with more defeats on his record than the other kid's had fights and the world champion against TBA (sounds familiar) after domestic level challenger had to pull out through injury hmm....nope. I'll pass.

thanks tho
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Old bones Ian »

to be honest i think Johnson is the type of boxer that won't actually retire until he gets KO'd or a bad beating. In his last fight he was just to slow for the young guy, and after a rest he suddenly thinks 'yes i can do it again'.
If he actually gets KO'd i think that would make up his mind to retire for good.
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by Shambles »

vxrandall wrote:
Shambles wrote:
Objectivism wrote:Am I the only one who feels a little uncomfortable with this fight? Johnson's well on the slide and the Paul Smith win apart Groves isn't a one punch banger so I could see the old boy get a systematic beating in going the full distance.

How come the Board are permitting this when Botha was knocked back for Fury recently?

A completely different situation. You're comparing Johnson, who still has something to give, with Botha who is pretty much a spent force.

In my opinion, Johnson will gove Groves a good fight, it wont be as one sided as you think.
so ...hands up whose got a ticket then? :-?

oh wait..there is another show on the week before and i think i might have one for that instead. plus there is the ppv for manny v jmm IV and its coming up to christmas and oh my gosh....

i might just have to give it a miss i guess. remind me...its the mysteriously injury prone kid against the old fella with more defeats on his record than the other kid's had fights and the world champion against TBA (sounds familiar) after domestic level challenger had to pull out through injury hmm....nope. I'll pass.

thanks tho
Not quite sure what you're response was meant to mean. Anyway, I don't have a ticket for Johnson v Groves, all I'm saying is that it will be fairly competitive in my opinion.

In future, you might want to keep away from the home made cider before posting.
vxrandall
Super Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Nov 2012, 16:35

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by vxrandall »

Shambles wrote:

Not quite sure what you're response was meant to mean. Anyway, I don't have a ticket for Johnson v Groves, all I'm saying is that it will be fairly competitive in my opinion.

In future, you might want to keep away from the home made cider before posting.
maybe i pressed quote instead of post reply 'just because'.

maybe i havent had a drink at all

maybe you should lay off the weed if u are going to get all paranoid.

maybe you should try to be less accusatory if u havent checked all your facts
vxrandall
Super Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 08 Nov 2012, 16:35

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by vxrandall »

Objectivism wrote:
Shambles wrote:In future, you might want to keep away from the home made cider before posting.
Image
:lol:
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by danconnollyeire »

No way Groves is losing this one

Good job he's with Fwank now. He will beat Abraham then have a 'legendary' run against H tier opponants before moving up to LHW when a unification with Froch/Ward comes up!
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by TopGun »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys, I heard TBA is looking really good in training.

:OhYes:

Yeah I heard that, he is really looking forward to fighting Groves. His sparring partner has got Burns so it's a happy camp at their TBA gym.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Groves v Johnson

Post by TJ77 »

Good match if it happens Johnson is as good a challenge Groves will get currently and
Saint George can learn alot about selling a fight .Degale showed him how not to do it .
Post Reply