Paul Dempsey

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by Horse »

Carbo wrote:Top marks for Carl.
I thought Froch, McKenzie and Smith were awful as well. Condescending, uppity and negative.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by whiskey »

Dempsey was like Richard Madely. Showed zero feelings and pretty patronising.

"Why didn't you take a 6 or 8 rounder - you're just a fool to yourself"

The team around Ricky were gesturing to just end the interview as he was a broken man.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3174
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by deadpan »

Duke's a gimme, but think the assessment of t'others is very harsh. Sorry that your night was quite so galling.
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

My fav was

"all those body punches you have given people over the years and tonight your undone by one yourself"

Like he was trying to stop a 3 year old from crying.
Last edited by jonnyyorkshu on 25 Nov 2012, 07:41, edited 1 time in total.
jonnyyorkshu
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 449
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by jonnyyorkshu »

"Rabchenko,that's the man that retired you isn't it Ryan?"

Harsh but fair,imagine if this was your dad growing up :lol:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by Horse »

deadpan wrote:Duke's a gimme, but think the assessment of t'others is very harsh. Sorry that your night was quite so galling.
They just moaned and acted superior.

Froch should make at least a little effort to be likeable.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3174
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by deadpan »

I like Froch. If I'm alone in that I stand chastened.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Dempsey is a tosser. I didn't see the final interview but I thought he was poor throughout.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by freddydoesdallas »

I thought Dempsey came across as a dick throughout. Constantly referring to Rhodes being stopped by rabchenko and taking the piss. Rhodes should've slapped him. The interview at the end looked like he thought it was his chance to audition as the replacement for piers morgans chat show.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by rhino222 »

i had been against hattons comeback from the start, recovering from depression is a long haul flight not a shuttle!.. its all still too raw, plus the coke sniffing etc, the BBB of C need their arses kicked for giving him the fighters licence. defeat for ricky last night was the best outcome to be honest, he can now get the help he needs and forget about fighting.
gasman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 740
Joined: 20 May 2009, 10:59

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by gasman »

Dempsey was ok in the studio he has to inject a bit of reality and criticism as Rhodes and Paulie were lashing non-stop praise and spin on the proceedings. But, Dempsey bumbled like he was a rabbit caught in headlights - he didnt seem to have anything prepared to ask Hatton and then he blabbed out a load of 'retrospective babble'.

Rhodes should have called it down the line after the fight, at least, but he refused to say the blatantly obvious - Hatton should retire. Woodhall was fudging the obvious as well and Paulie was heartbroken that his payday rematch with Hatton was a goner. That's the problem when you have guys that are too pally with the boxer on as pundits. At least Darke called it right eventually.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26471
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by banjo »

Didn't bother me, a breath of fresh air compared to the arse kissing gayfests you get on Sky and allegedly.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by CharlesListon »

G0mez wrote:Dempsey was like Richard Madely. Showed zero feelings and pretty patronising.

"Why didn't you take a 6 or 8 rounder - you're just a fool to yourself"

The team around Ricky were gesturing to just end the interview as he was a broken man.

I agree...I thought he was patronizing and overplayed the negatives. I also didn't like his earlier studio comment/suggestion surrounding how Ricky had managed to lose the weight. Ryan Rhodes clearly knew what was being implie. I think he was a slimey journalist more interested in the story than the man, which in fairness is what he is. And he had shit hair.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by rhino222 »

i thought the interview was fair and he managed to get hatton to elaborate the facts etc etc, the comment 'a fool to yourself son' sounded more personal than professional to me.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by twenty six »

Why all this spite aimed at commentators / pundits. Every fuckin week no matter which programme on whichever platform do we get this repetitive thread. You could do a cut and paste exercise and just change the names with some posters.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5467
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by forcefraser »

Carbo wrote:
Horse wrote:
Carbo wrote:Horse, Hatton was on the verge of tears. What was he meant to do? Pile in with, "You've just been put over by a body shot from a non-puncher. You're finished now, aren't you?"

A "normal" interview in that situation was impossible. Hatton had been bawling in the ring a minute earlier. He's just come back from serious depression, alcohol and drug problems. He was pinning everything on this, and it'd just been taken away from him. He was fighting back the tears. Giving him a proper grilling was completely unnecessary.

Further, I got the impression that Dempsey felt genuinely sorry for him, and didn't want to see Hatton embarrass himself.
He could have been respctful and sensitive.

He didn't have to give him some weird pep talk and put his face so close to Hatton's.

He was being creepy and he made me cringe, I felt uncomfortable watching it.
I wasn't watching, just listening. So, I can't comment on their relative head positions, but I didn't hear a pep talk, and repeat that a normal interview would have been impossible. Just what questions could have asked that he didn't?

If you think of the answers he got, he did everything he needed to coax the money quotes out of a mentally disintegrating man without being cruel.
His head was way too close. We were pretty stoned watching the fight and everyone thought Dempsey came across a weird case in the interview.
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by stevieb_8006 »

twenty six wrote:Why all this spite aimed at commentators / pundits. Every fuckin week no matter which programme on whichever platform do we get this repetitive thread. You could do a cut and paste exercise and just change the names with some posters.
:TU: I wonder what the moaners would have done differently? Prob "ur a legend Ricky" and othe such insightful nuggets
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Bunce on allegedly last night was nothing less than a prick with the whole calling up service stations or whatever else that schtick was.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by DavidPayne »

The one thing I took away from the whole Hatton story this weekend was this: Matt Macklin is a tremendously insightful pundit.

He was clear, erudite and very interesting.

Hope we hear lots of him once he's finished beating up middleweights.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5467
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by forcefraser »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Bunce on Allegedly channel last night was nothing less than a prick with the whole calling up service stations or whatever else that schtick was.

Nothing new there then
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Dempsey

Post by Counter-puncher »

DavidPayne wrote:The one thing I took away from the whole Hatton story this weekend was this: Matt Macklin is a tremendously insightful pundit.

He was clear, erudite and very interesting.

Hope we hear lots of him once he's finished beating up middleweights.

great call, the bits I heard of him he was very articulate and engaging, fantastic stuff :TU:
Post Reply