Froch Biggest Purse?

IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

banjo wrote:Maybe he doesn't care for the money? As long as he's getting enough to cover his expenses, pay the bills and put a nice wad away for retirement I'm guessing he's not fussed.
And to invest in his property portfolio in Nottingham as well.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Final round »

Datsue wrote:Image

That style is sooo last year!

Didn't Bute get near $1 mill to get a pasting in Nottingham
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26471
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by banjo »

JLP wrote:
banjo wrote:Maybe he doesn't care for the money? As long as he's getting enough to cover his expenses, pay the bills and put a nice wad away for retirement I'm guessing he's not fussed.
Perhaps. Not everybody is greedy. Like you said earlier, though, whatever he's getting is a shite lot more than what you get for a proper job. I sometimes think people see what top-flight footballers are paid and somehow reach the conclusion that if a sportsman is not getting similar amounts he's being underpaid.
It's just one of the things that tickles me with sportsmen, I'm a huge fan of Carls but judging by some comments you see on these boards you'd think he was living in dire poverty, after he's paid off everyone he owes he's still a lot better off than your normal worker. I understand some sports, especially combat sports, motorsports and contact sports can have serious consequences to your wellbeing but you've still got more chance of being killed or maimed as a minimum wage construction worker.
James Harte
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 71
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 18:05

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by James Harte »

Edit: Macklin's official purse for his last fight was $85,000. I'm not sure how he managed to top that up to a million?[/quote]

Where did you get the figures of Macklins purse from? I think he got £60,000 v Asikainen? Seems strange he'd get less in Maddison Square Garden than he would the Velodrome in Manchester?!?!
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by danconnollyeire »

JLP wrote:
Edit: Macklin's official purse for his last fight was $85,000. I'm not sure how he managed to top that up to a million?
Audley got a mil for fighting Haye :doh:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by crusader »

James Harte wrote:Where did you get the figures of Macklins purse from? I think he got £60,000 v Asikainen? Seems strange he'd get less in Maddison Square Garden than he would the Velodrome in Manchester?!?!
His last fight was in Las Vegas against Joachin Alcine, and he was paid $85,000.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dan-rafael/post ... -announced
Ratchet Exits Nu
Super Middleweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 26 Sep 2012, 18:04

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Ratchet Exits Nu »

Wasn't he getting £500k or was that $500k for the super six fights?
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by liamlion »

crusader wrote:
James Harte wrote:Where did you get the figures of Macklins purse from? I think he got £60,000 v Asikainen? Seems strange he'd get less in Maddison Square Garden than he would the Velodrome in Manchester?!?!
His last fight was in Las Vegas against Joachin Alcine, and he was paid $85,000.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dan-rafael/post ... -announced
Fair play mate. To be fair the figure of $1m was quoted to me by a brummie lad who knows Macklin very well from his Marbella training camp. I must admit, I queried the figure when I was told and did suspect that it was a touch unrealistic.
James Harte
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 71
Joined: 02 Jul 2012, 18:05

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by James Harte »

crusader wrote:
James Harte wrote:Where did you get the figures of Macklins purse from? I think he got £60,000 v Asikainen? Seems strange he'd get less in Maddison Square Garden than he would the Velodrome in Manchester?!?!
His last fight was in Las Vegas against Joachin Alcine, and he was paid $85,000.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dan-rafael/post ... -announced
Ah sorry, I clearly read that wrong. Any idea how much Macklin got vs Sturm and Martinez?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9026
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Syntax Error »

danconnollyeire wrote:
JLP wrote:
Edit: Macklin's official purse for his last fight was $85,000. I'm not sure how he managed to top that up to a million?
Audley got a mil for fighting Haye :doh:
'Fighting' being the operative word! :o :shame: :TU:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by orbtastic »

Million pound jab.
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by bigB »

crusader wrote:
James Harte wrote:Where did you get the figures of Macklins purse from? I think he got £60,000 v Asikainen? Seems strange he'd get less in Maddison Square Garden than he would the Velodrome in Manchester?!?!
His last fight was in Las Vegas against Joachin Alcine, and he was paid $85,000.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dan-rafael/post ... -announced

Love the amount Josito Lopez got $212,000 plus undisclosed fee - and Maidana who is a well known name gets $250,000 on the undercard.

I think it would be around $500k a fight for super 6 as an average
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by whiskey »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
G0mez wrote:Ward $900k and Froch $600k + tv rights
Why was Ward paid more????
Why did Ward fight Kessler, Bika and Green in Oakland whilst everyone else flew all over the world ?

Even then he fought Abraham LA and Froch in Atlantic City. Ward never even flew out to the European leg of the press tour until the last date (they never even came to Britain).

No Dirrell fight, No Taylor fight - guaranteed points win or lose against Bika.

Obviously he had a better negotiator.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23149
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by mickey1975 »

G0mez wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
G0mez wrote:Ward $900k and Froch $600k + tv rights
Why was Ward paid more????
Why did Ward fight Kessler, Bika and Green in Oakland whilst everyone else flew all over the world ?

Even then he fought Abraham LA and Froch in Atlantic City. Ward never even flew out to the European leg of the press tour until the last date (they never even came to Britain).

No Dirrell fight, No Taylor fight - guaranteed points win or lose against Bika.

Obviously he had a better negotiator.
I cant believe Ward was not a very warm favourite before the tournament. I got 3-1 on him beating Kessler, and thats by any method! It was an open secret how good he was, even PBF was saying he (Ward) was the second best fighter in the world, pound for pound.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Final round »

Tbf Ward had not beaten anyone to suggest he was the second best fighter in the world prior to the Super Six.

I still think Carl dropped a bollock not fighting Cleverley for £1 Mill. It will take him a Mack, Bute rematch and secure a Kessler fight to make a million.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23149
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by mickey1975 »

Final round wrote:Tbf Ward had not beaten anyone to suggest he was the second best fighter in the world prior to the Super Six.

I still think Carl dropped a bollock not fighting Cleverley for £1 Mill. It will take him a Mack, Bute rematch and secure a Kessler fight to make a million.
Thats correct, and i had seen very little of him, but some very wise heads were saying he was the real deal. In interviews, he just convinced me, too. I dont know why either as that never happens, he just seemed very self assured but in a good way.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Final round »

mickey1975 wrote:
Final round wrote:Tbf Ward had not beaten anyone to suggest he was the second best fighter in the world prior to the Super Six.

I still think Carl dropped a bollock not fighting Cleverley for £1 Mill. It will take him a Mack, Bute rematch and secure a Kessler fight to make a million.
Thats correct, and i had seen very little of him, but some very wise heads were saying he was the real deal. In interviews, he just convinced me, too. I dont know why either as that never happens, he just seemed very self assured but in a good way.
Did they? I didn't take much notice about him until he shut down Miranda even though he was a gold medal winner and I didn't enjoy his style or super six performances really until he the way dealt with Froch but the most exciting I've seen him was battering Dawson.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Dan Dares »

G0mez wrote:Ward never even flew out to the European leg of the press tour until the last date (they never even came to Britain)
Ward was at a UK presser for the final. Pissed myself when I found out SOG meant Son of God.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Tomasino »

G0mez wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
G0mez wrote:Ward $900k and Froch $600k + tv rights
Why was Ward paid more????
Why did Ward fight Kessler, Bika and Green in Oakland whilst everyone else flew all over the world ?

Even then he fought Abraham LA and Froch in Atlantic City. Ward never even flew out to the European leg of the press tour until the last date (they never even came to Britain).

No Dirrell fight, No Taylor fight - guaranteed points win or lose against Bika.

Obviously he had a better negotiator.

Exactly. Andre wouldn't have agreed to it without the fights at home. He is building a very large fan base hat home and that means a lot to him and his promotors.

Tbh before the super six Carl still had a lot of haters and critics, now, due to the super six opportunity and his own excellence as a fighter, he is beloved and seen as a British Atg. I sometimes entertain the notion he could beat Ward in a rematch, I feel that Andre was hampered more than Froch in the fight and was great in his next bout vs Dawson. Froch of course was devastating against Bute.

By the time Carl fights Ward again the fight should be worth three times what it was, if Froch wins his proposed rematches.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by bripez »

Final round wrote:
I still think Carl dropped a bollock not fighting Cleverley for £1 Mill. It will take him a Mack, Bute rematch and secure a Kessler fight to make a million.
What weight do they walk around at ?

Froch looks as though he walks around at about 12.5 stone whereas Clev (who is not quite as shite as some on here would say) has a big frame on him and could walk around at over 14 stone.

At the time of the fight there could be a weight discrepancy of well over a stone in weight - typical of that gobshite promoter to make an offer via the newspapers (neglecting to mention the options that he would want etc.).
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Froch Biggest Purse?

Post by Final round »

bripez wrote:
Final round wrote:
I still think Carl dropped a bollock not fighting Cleverley for £1 Mill. It will take him a Mack, Bute rematch and secure a Kessler fight to make a million.
What weight do they walk around at ?

Froch looks as though he walks around at about 12.5 stone whereas Clev (who is not quite as shite as some on here would say) has a big frame on him and could walk around at over 14 stone.

At the time of the fight there could be a weight discrepancy of well over a stone in weight - typical of that gobshite promoter to make an offer via the newspapers (neglecting to mention the options that he would want etc.).
yes there is a weight disparity there but there is also a class and experience disparity would would have negated the extra weight for my money. Nathan is far from crap, he's a good fighter and I like to watch him but relatively green in Froch's world and if there were no options and £1 mill in an account somewhere then he could have been fairly confident of earning it without too much risk imo.

Would you think Nathan could do Froch at LHW?
Post Reply