Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13446
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by jameswilson »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I'm still baffled by the turn of events that allow a 'carefully picked opponent' to somehow end up as a clear betting favourite.
This is baffling me. Flintoff flew to as far as 2.5 but is back to 2.37 now on Hills. God knows what the best odds were on him on any site.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

jameswilson wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:I'm still baffled by the turn of events that allow a 'carefully picked opponent' to somehow end up as a clear betting favourite.
This is baffling me. Flintoff flew to as far as 2.5 but is back to 2.37 now on Hills. God knows what the best odds were on him on any site.
It must be a rush of money from the 'eee's tryin boxin, eee's gonna get his 'ead kicked in' crowd, just betting against him out of spite. I've heard a surprising amount of people saying this...
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

This is a proverbial piss in the wind to pick a winner. I would go for Flintoff on points as he will be well instructed to run and jab (just like in the Documentary).

But no one really knows, but its going to be like watching a fight in a pub car park.
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by JLP »

The betting market for a rank novice debutant versus a guy who's fought before but there's no publicly available footage is obviously going to be all over the place with stabs in the dark from all concerned.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

i'm still picking Dawson to win in one round...

oh wow that terrible MC who used to introduce some Audley fights is in charge, thought he'd given it up years ago

God, can't believe I'm actually watching this. Car park brawl will be putting it politely.
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 30 Nov 2012, 18:52, edited 1 time in total.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Good luck to Flintoff, boxing's name cannot be dragged lower anyway, not that
Flintoff is doing that - I hope he does himself justice tonight.
willardx
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 157
Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 05:39

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by willardx »

4 two minute rounds?????????????????/
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Mimmy »

There spinning this out. But gl Freddie
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

the standard is actually a lot better than i expected. But I did expect the absolute worst.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Mimmy »

You have to give credit to Freddie. Anyone who stands toe to toe with another guy in the boxing ring has balls. Freddie fought poorly but he gave a good account for a guy who has never had any boxing experience. He never threw a single body shot or an uppercut for that matter, he went running in looking for that big shot, often his shots were slappy.

He gave all he could but he was very nervous and that showed. At the end of the day im sure the result was fair enough and not unpredictable I had Freddie winning on points all along.

Well done Andrew!
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I'm actually really impressed Flintoff managed to get up and recover so fast from that left hook he took in the second, on the replay it was a big shot right on the button and he didn't see it coming.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

39-38? As others pointed out, a result was always in the pipeline
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17120
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Flintoff's opponent has been very carefully selected, for one good reason.
Well you better get on Flintoff because Dawson is the clear betting favourite now.
It was only 11/10 when I put my £100 on.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13446
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Flintoff fight - who has it wrong?

Post by jameswilson »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Flintoff's opponent has been very carefully selected, for one good reason.
Well you better get on Flintoff because Dawson is the clear betting favourite now.
It was only 11/10 when I put my £100 on.
2.2 (12/10) for me with my 150 but I'v got it on the double with Fury (Fury was 1.20.)

I put it on purely because I thought as long as he didn't get knocked down and was aggressive (and I watched the Sky build up shows and in sparring he was throwing a lot despite shite tequnique) he would get the decision. Like I said earlier in the thread I was pretty sure the opponent would be around the same level of crapness as Freddie.
Post Reply