Quality of Richard Dawson

Post Reply

Did he

Not try
21
34%
Just fat and unfit
10
16%
Just terrible
31
50%
 
Total votes: 62

Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Coco »

Opinions?
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by gobbles »

I though when Flintoff rushed him, he just had no idea what to do, hence his lack of punches.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by lillywhite14 »

Possible to vote for all 3?
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Did Flintoff actually land on him. I haven't put myself through it again but I seem to remember him moving away quite easily and reading every punch thrown. He seemed to leave his "offense" at home though. Was that deliberate?
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

I think he got a fat bonus for his performance, he put Flintoff down and didn't follow
up which says it all.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by jessi »

lillywhite14 wrote:Possible to vote for all 3?
X2
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by lefthook82 »

Fat Git wrote:I think he got a fat bonus for his performance, he put Flintoff down and didn't follow
up which says it all.
x3

4th option. did he read the script and act accordingly
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17120
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by keithmoonhangover »

A 2-0 fighter from Oklahoma, what did people expect?
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Newport Daz »

When watching him fight, Dawson looked like he at least knew what he was doing. In terms of technique he was much better than Freddie. To me Freddie got the decision because unbelievably, he was very fit and his work rate won him the rounds. Dawson was symptomatic of American heavies - simply out of shape. I don't think it was fix, they just chose an unfit guy with minimal experience.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Mimmy »

Newport Daz wrote:When watching him fight, Dawson looked like he at least knew what he was doing. In terms of technique he was much better than Freddie. To me Freddie got the decision because unbelievably, he was very fit and his work rate won him the rounds. Dawson was symptomatic of American heavies - simply out of shape. I don't think it was fix, they just chose an unfit guy with minimal experience.
Totally agree :TU:
tsunami
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 189
Joined: 01 Mar 2009, 10:21

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by tsunami »

Maybe the occasion got to him?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Old bones Ian »

Dawson had only had 1 amateur fight, and 2 pro fights on club shows. He was hardly going to be top class, he knew the basics i'm not sure what else anyone was wanting?
Rockys gum shield
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Rockys gum shield »

In retrospect his appearance at the Manchester Arena is even more insane than Freddie's, must have been amazed when he was plucked to take a fight in a arena.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Coco »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Did Flintoff actually land on him. I haven't put myself through it again but I seem to remember him moving away quite easily and reading every punch thrown. He seemed to leave his "offense" at home though. Was that deliberate?
That's what I felt, defensively he easily handled Flintoff, the cricket player barely landed a punch.
However Dawson never threw anything back, esp after Fred got dropped with that little shot.
Was this because he froze? Was too unfit? Or just did not try?
Cholo_cws
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1904
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 16:19

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by Cholo_cws »

He might have looked unfit but he only had to fight for eight minutes maximum and yet hardly threw anything. I take it the trip over here was well worth it.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Quality of Richard Dawson

Post by gobbles »

Coco wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Did Flintoff actually land on him. I haven't put myself through it again but I seem to remember him moving away quite easily and reading every punch thrown. He seemed to leave his "offense" at home though. Was that deliberate?
That's what I felt, defensively he easily handled Flintoff, the cricket player barely landed a punch.
However Dawson never threw anything back, esp after Fred got dropped with that little shot.
Was this because he froze? Was too unfit? Or just did not try?

Flintoff landed his best shots when Dawson ducked low. Up against the ropes he was only really slapping
Post Reply