Palooka, who are you lecturing?palooka wrote:Fury is 24 years old, 12 months ago he'd have been 23 (clever aren't I?);very young for a heavyweight. He turned pro at 20 year old without massive amateur exerience. He's doing fine, as is Price; they're both very good prospects who should continue to do well and earn good money. If Fury boxed Pajkic again I doubt he'd get touched. The man is improving; we are lucky in the UK that we have some good heavyweights, some on the way up and some on the way down. i don't understand why people have to knock one or the other, it is better now for us fans than it was 3 or 4 years ago. It's a good tme to watch heavyweight boxing - there will be some good scraps, we'll be entertained, there will be some upsets and we'll have lots to comment on.Datsue wrote:Snarky one-note fvckwit.polecateddy wrote:It seems anywhere between 95-98% of people on here are predicting an easy Fury victory, just as they all did with Ricky Hatton last weekend. Johnson is being made to seem like a passive fat punchbag in most threads. Hardly anyone has noted just how good Johnson's jab is... but say it and people just want to make jokes that he only throws 3-4 a round. Nobody seems to want to accept that Fury nearly got stopped by Neven Pajkic, who at best was a very average journeyman, barely a year ago. Johnson has the tools pull off the upset. Second weekend in a row and the armchair pundits are wrong, blind or ignorant ...take your pick!
Mid-late rounds stoppage by the American.
& if it is the correct person, why fvcking quote me?