Tomlinson v berry

buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by buster007 »

[quote="Brute"]Oganov's rabbit punches did not help Pitt, but getting the upper hand for a short time is not enough if you don't go on with it.

With 12 months gone since the fight Oganov does not seem keen for a rematch.[/quote]
does not seem keen?

based on what ffs? hilarious!!!!

oganov was far from happy and was requesting a rematch but was not given it.

seems u r wrong.

like i said, god was on pitts side that day, oh and his mate the ref too pmsl.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by Brute »

There is no God and Oganov has had plenty of time to organise a rematch.

Has he retired?
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by Brute »

dan h wrote:
Brute wrote:Oganov could not knock Pitt down.
In case you haven't seen the fight you might like to watch it, particularly from the 14 minute mark onwards. You might notice the knock down and count...I am sure you will disaagree with it but that is a knock down in my books.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAk_U9jV ... ults_video

I agree with you though. 12 months on a rematch probably isn't in order.

I just don't think all this talk of Pitt not having anyone left here to fight is warranted. To me, the Oganov fight showed he has a ways to go before challenging on the international stage. I thought he went missing a bit when the going got tough, but that is just my opinion.
You would count a knockdown from a rabbit punch, then? The rabbit punch has always been illegal.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by buster007 »

[quote="Brute"]There is no God and Oganov has had plenty of time to organise a rematch.

Has he retired?[/quote]
bit hard to organise a rematch when your opponent won't agree to it.

maybe u didn't think of that though.
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by dan h »

Brute wrote:
dan h wrote:
Brute wrote:Oganov could not knock Pitt down.
In case you haven't seen the fight you might like to watch it, particularly from the 14 minute mark onwards. You might notice the knock down and count...I am sure you will disaagree with it but that is a knock down in my books.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAk_U9jV ... ults_video

I agree with you though. 12 months on a rematch probably isn't in order.

I just don't think all this talk of Pitt not having anyone left here to fight is warranted. To me, the Oganov fight showed he has a ways to go before challenging on the international stage. I thought he went missing a bit when the going got tough, but that is just my opinion.
You would count a knockdown from a rabbit punch, then? The rabbit punch has always been illegal.

As the ref did, I would count that as a knock down. It was a hook the Pitt tried to duck and lunge forward into. Fair play IMO.
Grant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 23 Jan 2004, 21:41

Re: Tomlinson v berry

Post by Grant »

I wa there that night and it looked like a good shot from my cheap seats. This was a fight screaming out for a rematch but really Hollywood should have learned from it and should win easy next time if only for his physical advantage.
It's a fight we want to see but that is not a reason for it to be made I guess
Post Reply