Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Ali vs Tyson - Who Wins?

Muhammed Ali
65
66%
Mike Tyson
33
34%
 
Total votes: 98

desperados
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by desperados »

hurlock wrote:
People on here saying Tyson was overated are complete fools with no knowledge!!

well surely that depends on how you percieve someone to be rated.

the OP says he's the greatest fighter ever... that is overrated.

The most annoying aspect of Tyson fans is they are full of excuses. All you hear is he wasn't hismelf when he lost to Buster. He was never the same after jail when he got a boxing lesson from Evander. Or when they ask only to judge Tyson at his 'peak', not that his 'peak' is a particular span, but we just need to imagine him, perhaps based on an individual performance, then say "yeah man, nobody would have beat THAT Tyson, the one that beats spinks, Berbick, Holmes...". Well what about Riddick Bowe? I'm allowed to apply the Tyson logic to him? His 'peak' performance was probably KTFO Holyfield. Can we forget everything else and name him the greatest fighter of all times?
IronLiver
Cruiserweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 10:30

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by IronLiver »

This is a fresh new topic! Good work!

YAWN!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Tyson's speed would certainly have troubled Ali early on, I can even see him knocking Ali down - but in the end, Ali would have gotten inside his head, broken his will and probably stopped him. Tyson was a poor fighter over the latter half of a fight, whereas a peak Ali got stronger as the fight wore on. Tyson did have a very good chin, so he may have survived, but every time Tyson lost, he got stopped, it was more a mental thing than anything, once he stopped having his own way, Mike began to mentally implode, and then finally, physically concede after absorbing a terrific beating.

I always have figured Tyson beat's frazier though, his speed and his fast start would have troubled Joe, who always took a few rounds of smokin' to get going. I don't think he'd have been given time against Tyson, and it would have been like the Foreman fights.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

desperados wrote:
hurlock wrote:
People on here saying Tyson was overated are complete fools with no knowledge!!

well surely that depends on how you percieve someone to be rated.

the OP says he's the greatest fighter ever... that is overrated.

The most annoying aspect of Tyson fans is they are full of excuses. All you hear is he wasn't hismelf when he lost to Buster. He was never the same after jail when he got a boxing lesson from Evander. Or when they ask only to judge Tyson at his 'peak', not that his 'peak' is a particular span, but we just need to imagine him, perhaps based on an individual performance, then say "yeah man, nobody would have beat THAT Tyson, the one that beats spinks, Berbick, Holmes...". Well what about Riddick Bowe? I'm allowed to apply the Tyson logic to him? His 'peak' performance was probably KTFO Holyfield. Can we forget everything else and name him the greatest fighter of all times?

Bowe's first fight with Evander was his peak for me. He looked superlative that night, had every single wrinkle in the game. Jab, engine, inside outside, just terrific. Bowe just lacked the mental discipline to go along with his supreme talent and athletic gifts.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by ILikeBeer »

handsofstone wrote:what annoys me about Tyson and the casual boxing fan is that they all say Tyson was the best ever etc i can guarantee nobody will be able to name an oponnent apart from Bruno that he beat
Oooh. Oooh. Clifford Etienne.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs a Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by keithmoonhangover »

desperados wrote:this probably belongs in the boxers of the past section. And peak Tyson got ko'd by Buster, and would have lost to a load of great heavyweights that he couldn't ktfo early.
Tyson wasn't at his peak against Douglas, he stopped training properly after Spinks.

I picked Ali BTW.
Rocky Balboa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1851
Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38

Re: Peak Muhammed Ali vs Peak Mike Tyson - Who wins!

Post by Rocky Balboa »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
handsofstone wrote:what annoys me about Tyson and the casual boxing fan is that they all say Tyson was the best ever etc i can guarantee nobody will be able to name an oponnent apart from Bruno that he beat
I could name a few. I agree though, he's terribly overrated by a lot of people. I wouldn't put him in a top ten of all time heavyweights let alone first.
Do you really believe there are 10 or more HW's that would have beaten Tyson @ his best.

In my opinion, he's not the best ever, but only Ali, Holmes, Liston, Foreman & Louis would have beaten him. He beats all the rest. He COULD have miles better than ANY OTHER Heavyweight in history, but it didn't turn out like that.

People are so quick to say, "Tyson is very overrated", & I do agree some people do overrate him. However, the same applies to Ali. It's absolute rubbish when people say, "Ali is the best P4P ever". Get real! Ray Robinson, Roberto Duran & Ray Leonard were more complete fighters than Ali, in my opinion.

People make out Tyson wouldn't have laid a glove on Ali, which is utter bullshit.
Post Reply