Counter-puncher wrote:Maleymaley1984 wrote:mcato wrote: I knew it was just a matter of time before you showed up. Harbi is going for the PF this much more £££ than the English and you know its all about the ££££. Good to hear from you anyway
U didn't answer the question. I go to shows and wanna see 50-50 fights like any other boxing fan. U like having a dig but don't like it back. I'm not even a al harbi fan. I hav a interest in this title cause a gym mate of my cuz who I know was in the mix for it b4 injury. All the best to nasser in pf but I know who I want to win pf and it ay nasser.
Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
Re: Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
-
ta596
- Heavyweight

Re: Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
Woody the way you are punching that bag you won't last the 3 rounds lolwoody99 wrote:i know whos winning this...![]()
Re: Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
Could Curtis step up a weight think he would do well and always looks big at light welter weight
Re: Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
saw a tweet off hearn saying names will now b released early next week 20 possible names in the mix

Re: Prizefighter Jan 19th Welterweights
If you can't take it get your boxing else where, Sky have as close to have given up on it anywaymcato wrote:You wouldn't be complaining if you owned the monoply of boxing on Sky. It is what it is. In America all they talk about is Pac & Mayweather it does get boring but if you can't take it try another sport there's tons of them.stujones wrote:Froch, Brook, Prizefighter, Froch, Brook, Prizefighter, Khan, Froch, Brook, Prizefighter.... ahhh - same old same old