Geale v Mundane 2

Post Reply
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Brute »

I speak English. You speak something else.

What were you quoting anyway? Looks like something you made up.

With a quote you should reveal your source, e.g., "voyeur, n, someone who attains sexual gratification by looking at sexual objects or situations." (Macquarie Dictionary & Thesaurus, This edition published 2012).
Last edited by Brute on 21 Dec 2012, 01:50, edited 1 time in total.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by buster007 »

u have a dinosaur as a pet when u were a kid huh?
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Brute »

buster007 wrote:u have a dinosaur as a pet when u were a kid huh?
Not unless the dinosaurs evolved into dogs, cats or budgies. You got something against people who have lived longer than you? Patron is older than I am, do you doubt his wisdom?

Grow up.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by buster007 »

waa waa waa.

no, just bitter ones like u.

u need to think what u dish out if u wonder why you get responses like u do.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Brute »

I'm not bitter, I just find you to be a source of unintentional humour.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by buster007 »

u wouldn't know humour if it bit u on the nuts.

i bet nobody has ever witnessed u even crack a smile.

u strike me as a school principal type of person.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Brute »

Stick to digging holes. You are no good at anything else. You are certainly not a comedian.
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by #1 BoXa »

buster007 wrote:u wouldn't know humour if it bit u on the nuts.

i bet nobody has ever witnessed u even crack a smile.

u strike me as a school principal type of person.
:OhYes:
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

buster007 wrote:u wouldn't know humour if it bit u on the nuts.

i bet nobody has ever witnessed u even crack a smile.

u strike me as a school principal type of person.
I'm only 25, and I have trouble reading your jibberish sometimes
caveman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 519
Joined: 28 Dec 2009, 00:16

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by caveman »

only chance awad has is if he knocks jamie out,pittman will box his ears off
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Brute »

Note the poor opinion Bluster has of schoolteachers. If his headmaster looked sour it was probably because of having students like Bluster. :OhYes:
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by dan h »

On the topic of this fight (not that I am trying get off topic), has anyone been watching the free replays of Mundine's and Geale's fights on main event?

After watching them I have changed my opinion on a few things, I don't know why, but i did:

1. I thought geale was lucky to get a decision v Sylvestre, now I think he won 116-112;
2. I thought mundine won the first fight, now I think geale just edged it;
3. I thought geale was lucky to get a decision v Sturm, now I think he won at least 116-112;
4. I thought Kessler owned Mundine, now I have to say it was one of Mundine's best ever performances and I think he was extremely competitivem winning 4 rds.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Like a Boss »

caveman wrote:only chance awad has is if he knocks jamie out,pittman will box his ears off
Pittman has been a good performer. But he hasn't fought in a year and a half and that was his second round stoppage at the hands of Yannick.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

dan h wrote:On the topic of this fight (not that I am trying get off topic), has anyone been watching the free replays of Mundine's and Geale's fights on main event?

After watching them I have changed my opinion on a few things, I don't know why, but i did:

1. I thought geale was lucky to get a decision v Sylvestre, now I think he won 116-112;
2. I thought mundine won the first fight, now I think geale just edged it;
3. I thought geale was lucky to get a decision v Sturm, now I think he won at least 116-112;
4. I thought Kessler owned Mundine, now I have to say it was one of Mundine's best ever performances and I think he was extremely competitivem winning 4 rds.
I was entirely confident Daniel had done enough v sylvester, aside from a few eye catching jabs by sebastian. Daniel out worked him. 117-111 was my score, I didn't think it was very close. Vs sturm I had him winning by a single point. I think there will be a rematch next year.
I felt Geale edged the Mundine fight, and was robbed of a KD. Mundine v Kessler, Mundine fought very well, it was the beginning of his prime
caveman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 519
Joined: 28 Dec 2009, 00:16

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by caveman »

TrainInsane wrote:
caveman wrote:only chance awad has is if he knocks jamie out,pittman will box his ears off
Pittman has been a good performer. But he hasn't fought in a year and a half and that was his second round stoppage at the hands of Yannick.
awad hasnt fought much in the last couple of years either,and his style is still the same as it was three years ago,depends on a heavy right hand too much when pressured,unless awad lands one pittman will be too quick for him
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by amwsnw »

I see Kimbo is off the card...positive I think, if the fight in his place is a competitive one.
convict
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 668
Joined: 01 Sep 2007, 08:35

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by convict »

I think its quiet possible for Mundine to win this fight. Even though Geale has the titles Im sure Mundine would be getting at least %50 or more since he has the name. Does anyone know or have any idea what the fight purse is?.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

convict wrote:I think its quiet possible for Mundine to win this fight. Even though Geale has the titles Im sure Mundine would be getting at least %50 or more since he has the name. Does anyone know or have any idea what the fight purse is?.
Mundine is going to be very motivated no doubt, this is it for him. I imagine it will be close for the first 4-5 rounds. Mundine will prob even be winning through speed and accuracy. However I think in the second half of the fight choc won't be able to keep up with the pace Daniel will set. His legs won't hold up and his age will show. Does anyone think this current version of Mundine could fight 12 at the pace of the Geale - Sturm fight? I dont. I imagine a 117-111 type decision, maybe a Late corner stoppage
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Like a Boss »

amwsnw wrote:I see Kimbo is off the card...positive I think, if the fight in his place is a competitive one.
Boxrec still have him listed on the card. Where did you read he is off it?
convict
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 668
Joined: 01 Sep 2007, 08:35

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by convict »

thunderfromdownunder wrote:
convict wrote:I think its quiet possible for Mundine to win this fight. Even though Geale has the titles Im sure Mundine would be getting at least %50 or more since he has the name. Does anyone know or have any idea what the fight purse is?.
Mundine is going to be very motivated no doubt, this is it for him. I imagine it will be close for the first 4-5 rounds. Mundine will prob even be winning through speed and accuracy.However I think in the second half of the fight choc won't be able to keep up with the pace Daniel will set. His legs won't hold up and his age will show. Does anyone think this current version of Mundine could fight 12 at the pace of the Geale - Sturm fight? I dont. I imagine a 117-111 type decision, maybe a Late corner stoppage
Well said, I agree with that.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by Like a Boss »

convict wrote:I think its quiet possible for Mundine to win this fight. Even though Geale has the titles Im sure Mundine would be getting at least %50 or more since he has the name. Does anyone know or have any idea what the fight purse is?.
Nobody will know until the pay per view and all the other revenue is sorted. They probably won't tell us anyway.
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by amwsnw »

TrainInsane wrote:
amwsnw wrote:I see Kimbo is off the card...positive I think, if the fight in his place is a competitive one.
Boxrec still have him listed on the card. Where did you read he is off it?
My mistake mate...he is still on !!
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by dan h »

So farthere have been 5 videos sent in to the competition to fight Kimbo:

Ben Edwards
Nathan Corbett
Tai Tuivasa
Will Nasio
Ty Ceminara


Of those 5, Bangin Ben or Carnage Corbett would be the best fights but I doubt they get picked as they would both demolish Kimbo IMO. Ty Ceminara I think is a boxing fan with some amature experience, I am not to sure I just remember him getting banned from KT's website for picking on kids, but he would surely not be considered as he is way smaller than Kimbo. The other 2 I don't know but would most likely be the choice I guess as they are big dudes with not a lot of experience.

Personally I hope they pick Nathan Corbett as I love watching that guy fight, I wish he was in boxing or MMA as he doesn't get the exposure he deserves from Muay Thia. People in MMA talk about Tyrone Sprong being a p[otential superstar and Corbet knocked him out!
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

dan h wrote:So farthere have been 5 videos sent in to the competition to fight Kimbo:

Ben Edwards
Nathan Corbett
Tai Tuivasa
Will Nasio
Ty Ceminara


Of those 5, Bangin Ben or Carnage Corbett would be the best fights but I doubt they get picked as they would both demolish Kimbo IMO. Ty Ceminara I think is a boxing fan with some amature experience, I am not to sure I just remember him getting banned from KT's website for picking on kids, but he would surely not be considered as he is way smaller than Kimbo. The other 2 I don't know but would most likely be the choice I guess as they are big dudes with not a lot of experience.

Personally I hope they pick Nathan Corbett as I love watching that guy fight, I wish he was in boxing or MMA as he doesn't get the exposure he deserves from Muay Thia. People in MMA talk about Tyrone Sprong being a p[otential superstar and Corbet knocked him out!
Ty is TCboxa on the eastsideboxing forum. He's a strange guy
N2 Shape
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1384
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:53

Re: Geale v Mundane 2

Post by N2 Shape »

No doubt the comp requires videos sent in so Kimbo can choose the weakest link!! Havent seen much of Corbett but he'd be shitting bricks watching Edwards!
Post Reply