Lewis v Rahman II

chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Lewis v Rahman II

Post by chinny »

A nasty bout of flu means I've spent much of the last couple of days wallowing in my favourite fights.
Watching the Rahman rematch a couple of things struck me:

- at the start of the SBO broadcast, round 1, Ian Darke who I trust, mentioned Lewis was guaranteed $11m with Rahman "only" $5m and a slice of PPV. How can this be given Lewis was challenger? Was this part of the rematch contract which Team Lewis fought and won in court?

- I hadn't previously noticed Gary Shaw. He looked firmly in the Lewis camp. Was he part of Main Events? If so what did he do for them?

Thanks!
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by jameswilson »

chinny wrote:A nasty bout of flu means I've spent much of the last couple of days wallowing in my favourite fights.
Watching the Rahman rematch a couple of things struck me:

- at the start of the SBO broadcast, round 1, Ian Darke who I trust, mentioned Lewis was guaranteed $11m with Rahman "only" $5m and a slice of PPV. How can this be given Lewis was challenger? Was this part of the rematch contract which Team Lewis fought and won in court?

- I hadn't previously noticed Gary Shaw. He looked firmly in the Lewis camp. Was he part of Main Events? If so what did he do for them?

Thanks!
Unless it is a defence that has gone the purse bids route then the purse split can be whatever the 2 sides negotiate.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by lillywhite14 »

I remember when Bruno fought Tyson the 2nd time. Bruno was champ but Tyson got five times more money!
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by chinny »

jameswilson wrote:
Unless it is a defence that has gone the purse bids route then the purse split can be whatever the 2 sides negotiate.
I realise that, but on this occasion Rahman had all the leverage and as far as I can recall, Lewis simply wanted his rematch. Coming out of the first bout Rahman acted like a free agent, eventually being seduced by King. It just seems a very strange split.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by chinny »

lillywhite14 wrote:I remember when Bruno fought Tyson the 2nd time. Bruno was champ but Tyson got five times more money!
More I think! Bruno got £3m from memory and Tyson $25m.

Bruno had signed a cast iron contract with Bunny prior to the McCall fight and Bunny was then in bed with King.

Tyson, though King, had signed a $200m six fight deal with the MGM Grand. That deal allowed for one non MGM fight which turned out to be Mathis Jr.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by jameswilson »

chinny wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
Unless it is a defence that has gone the purse bids route then the purse split can be whatever the 2 sides negotiate.
I realise that, but on this occasion Rahman had all the leverage and as far as I can recall, Lewis simply wanted his rematch. Coming out of the first bout Rahman acted like a free agent, eventually being seduced by King. It just seems a very strange split.
Well I think Rahman realised that he wouldn't make as much money fighting anyone else, regardless of what split he got from anyone else. John Ruiz I think was the other champ at the time so I think Rahman realised that 10% of a hell of a lot (or whatever the split was) was better than 70% of hardly anything.
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by JLP »

chinny wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
Unless it is a defence that has gone the purse bids route then the purse split can be whatever the 2 sides negotiate.
I realise that, but on this occasion Rahman had all the leverage and as far as I can recall, Lewis simply wanted his rematch. Coming out of the first bout Rahman acted like a free agent, eventually being seduced by King. It just seems a very strange split.
You'd probably have to leaf through the contracts for LEWIS vs RAHMAN I to get a good handle on why the contracts for LEWIS vs RAHMAN II were what they were.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by orbtastic »

Didn't he split with CKP and go with DKP for this fight?
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Bennyblanco »

My favourite KO :bow:
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26337
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by banjo »

I liked the shot from above with Rahman and the crown.

Image

Looks like a fornicating cartoon character
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Bennyblanco »

Great photo. It's that jab then then big right hand :zzz:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Wales »

Bennyblanco wrote:Great photo. It's that jab then then big right hand :zzz:
Absolute garbage.... It was jab then big right "fornicating told you so" :TU:
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26337
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by banjo »

The bit I loved was the build up when Rahman thought he was being clever by questioning Lennox's sexuality at every opportunity and Lewis responded with something like "bring me your sister and we'll see" causing Rahman to flip.

Lennox had regained his championship with that moment.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5737
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Cyclops »

banjo wrote:The bit I loved was the build up when Rahman thought he was being clever by questioning Lennox's sexuality at every opportunity and Lewis responded with something like "bring me your sister and we'll see" causing Rahman to flip.

Lennox had regained his championship with that moment.
Had to check this out as I'd never seen it before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY5ABkVe3W0
I have to, Chisora-Haye is a better pre fight tear up. This is kinda girly.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by lillywhite14 »

I don't think Haye would have lamped Chisora had they been a week or two away from fighting.
jessi
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by jessi »

banjo wrote:I liked the shot from above with Rahman and the crown.

Image

Looks like a effing cartoon character
Great shot ! Nice hat
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Adamj1987 »

i thought he agreed to it because don king gave him a sack load of money to sign with him and promised he would get more after the rematch as long as he won
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

'NO CARNTEST'

'NO GUY TOUCH THIS MON'
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by jameswilson »

Riddick Blowe wrote:'NO CARNTEST'

'NO GUY TOUCH THIS MON'
KITCHENER WATERLOO BIG UP!!!
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by JLP »

"MUCH LOVE N RESPEC GOING OUT TO THE STOENBRIDGE ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND CREW"...

Whoops, wrong Olympic champ.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by lillywhite14 »

Vaudeville Villain wrote:The NOOB is correct. Rahman summed up the ethos of boxing by turning down much more money in the form of a cheque and going for the duffel bag of cash that King brought to a roadside diner. It was an advance on his purse and is a trick King used often on black fighters from a certain background because he knew that they’d take cash money over wire transfers or cheques. King understood boxing, and boxers, more than anyone who has ever operated within the sport. Well, Lewis aside, as Lennox played Don like a violin, King once gave Lewis a car after hearing whispers that Lewis might be prepared to do business with him long-term.
Was it King that gave Lennox $12m for his first defence of his WBC belt against Tucker in an attempt to woo him?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by Ezzard »

Didn’t Lewis have to go through the courts or threaten it before the rematch was granted? I seem to remember King trying to wriggle out of the clause or say it wasn’t legit or something…
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27449
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by stujones »

It was originally Rahman vs David Izon with I think Tyson maybe on the "undercard". Certainly Rahman vs Izon was announced.

Lewis was havining none of it.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by loaded_gloves »

chinny wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:I remember when Bruno fought Tyson the 2nd time. Bruno was champ but Tyson got five times more money!
More I think! Bruno got £3m from memory and Tyson $25m.

Bruno had signed a cast iron contract with Bunny prior to the McCall fight and Bunny was then in bed with King.
Waaay wrong. Tyson $8 to Bruno's $3.

Tyson was the star in this Showtime US PPV.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Lewis v Rahman II

Post by loaded_gloves »

lillywhite14 wrote:
Vaudeville Villain wrote:The NOOB is correct. Rahman summed up the ethos of boxing by turning down much more money in the form of a cheque and going for the duffel bag of cash that King brought to a roadside diner. It was an advance on his purse and is a trick King used often on black fighters from a certain background because he knew that they’d take cash money over wire transfers or cheques. King understood boxing, and boxers, more than anyone who has ever operated within the sport. Well, Lewis aside, as Lennox played Don like a violin, King once gave Lewis a car after hearing whispers that Lewis might be prepared to do business with him long-term.
Was it King that gave Lennox $12m for his first defence of his WBC belt against Tucker in an attempt to woo him?
Yes he cut Tucker's $2 purse down to $1 and paid Lewis a seductive $9. DK lost a lot of money on that night despite Chavez and McClellan/Jackson on the undercard. Tucker was never a draw and no one cared about Lewis in the US.
Post Reply