Gatti v forgot
Louis v galentino
Johnson v Patterson
I agree.gilgamesh wrote:I don't think there's any such thing as a lucky punch in boxing. Even if a guy is losing every round, it's up to the other guy to keep his defense sure and to have trained hard and not run out of gas. If he runs out of gas or slips up for even a second, and the other guy is able to take advantage and land a KO shot...then in that moment he proved himself the superior fighter. Sometimes a moment is all it takes. Throwing a punch with the intention of hurting a guy and then hurting him, isn't luck, it's Boxing.
Good post.gilgamesh wrote:I don't think there's any such thing as a lucky punch in boxing. Even if a guy is losing every round, it's up to the other guy to keep his defense sure and to have trained hard and not run out of gas. If he runs out of gas or slips up for even a second, and the other guy is able to take advantage and land a KO shot...then in that moment he proved himself the superior fighter. Sometimes a moment is all it takes. Throwing a punch with the intention of hurting a guy and then hurting him, isn't luck, it's Boxing.
Yep, Ruddock was on his way in destroying that fraud and was dominating the first round.The Dark Destroyer wrote:The right hand that took Rudduck's legs away was lucky was it?RazorKO wrote:Lewis vs Ruddock
Welcome back RazorKO! Good to see your love for British boxing has held firm in spite of all the brutal ko's that South African fighters have sufferered here over the years...RazorKO wrote:Yep, Ruddock was on his way in destroying that fraud and was dominating the first round.The Dark Destroyer wrote:The right hand that took Rudduck's legs away was lucky was it?RazorKO wrote:Lewis vs Ruddock
If the fight was fought in any other country but England, Lewis would be eating hospital food.
And we all know that boxing in Britain is akin to German boxing for its corruption.
right. now that is some compelling argument.kayfoo wrote:I don't think there is technically such a thing called a lucky punch. ... I think it's possible to land a perfect punch without even looking but it's also possible that a perfect punch can miss.
of course not. to me a lucky punch is when you areelmersalsa wrote:Do you guys think the punch that the great Rocky Marciano gave the great Jersey Joe Walcott on the chin a lucky punch?
That was no lucky punch in that Chavez v Taylor fight. Chavez expertly maneuvered Taylor into a corner and threw a textbook straight right hand that dropped him after Taylor had taken 12 rounds of brutal punishment. Just ask Dr. Flip Homansky. It's not like Chavez was throwing windmill punches with his eyes closed.hurlock wrote:Chavez v Taylor
Gatti v forgot![]()
Louis v galentino
Johnson v Patterson
I read this and the Calzaghe quote with amazement. I agree that the Manfredo stoppage was premature, but are you seriously contending that Manfredo would have provided some sort of competition if the fight had gone on? Which of Manfredo's performances, before or since would suggest that? I can buy calling Calzaghe a fraud; he avoided nearly all meaningful competition, but I think he had the skills to beat nearly everyone in his era, and was certainly a league above Manfredo.RazorKO wrote:Yep, Ruddock was on his way in destroying that fraud and was dominating the first round.The Dark Destroyer wrote:The right hand that took Rudduck's legs away was lucky was it?RazorKO wrote:Lewis vs Ruddock
If the fight was fought in any other country but England, Lewis would be eating hospital food.
And we all know that boxing in Britain is akin to German boxing for its corruption.
Funny! What did Sullivan say when you made fun of his mustache? OK, just kiddin jac.....Jaclem wrote:..when i asked ezzard charles if that left hook walcott kayoed him with was a lucky punch, he said, "not for me it wasn't"