Boxing/Sports Bonus Data: Past Elites are Better?

Post Reply
kal.majeed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 30 May 2011, 12:32

Boxing/Sports Bonus Data: Past Elites are Better?

Post by kal.majeed »

Just got back to ‘blog-world’ and some important issues to discuss (for those interested).

First, my site has been tampered with (and this has to have been done internally) as only a couple of people even know of its location and it has consistently been under a lock; I have reported this issue to the necessary parties but have not yet heard back from anyone (!?!?!?); it is almost unworkable to edit or upgrade any data or for outside parties to view.

This may actually be a blessing in disguise and a sign that another attempt to connect with those who have clearly voiced that my work (thus far) has not been of a sufficient ‘caliber’ (using a diplomatic term) to convince them of the conclusion(s).

Hence, I have uploaded (via Google docs) a 6 page supplementary (PDF) article that I have been working on over the past few weeks [that includes a historic look back at the Pacquiao stoppage loss – folks should have seen this one coming – and I initially missed the signs as well – no, it is not a repeat of Hearns-Duran since they only fought each other once and yes, Manny, you should listen to your wife and retire – this series has fully concluded as you will soon see; I am certain that you wish you chose Bradley (Tony Canzoneri’s counterpart – in this matchup) instead - well, it’s too late now].

Recall, McLarnin and Ross, Pacquiao’s and Marquez’s historic counterparts, only fought a TRILOGY and once the bell sounds and a fourth encounter (for Manny and Juan Manuel) becomes official, an entirely new set of variables set into place (connecting the Pacquiao-Marquez fight series with OTHER great fight series of the past – with some astonishing key consistencies)!

Of course, Jimmy McLarnin (Pacquiao’s historic counterpart) and Henry Armstrong (Mayweather Jr.’s historic counterpart) are never matched against each other (this occurrence certainly appears to be repeating).

The 6 page PDF is an ALL SPORTS synopsis with a wide variety of viewpoints and general notations, using the most basic referenced data and in a number of cases emphasizing historical/time/age aspects (the most vital of the entries that appear on pages 1, 4 and 5).

Sports such as boxing, tennis, baseball, basketball and American football are highlighted.

Any type of feedback is welcomed and if one does not like or understand any or all of the data presented, I would especially like to hear from you as there is always room for improvement and before I would ever proceed (once the site issues are hopefully taken care of!?!?!), any and all noted negative aspects must be addressed/corrected.

Remember, it is impractical to advance and try to explain the HOWs and WHYs (especially for FREE) when far too many do not grasp the WHATs. There are in fact potent and actual (scientific/metaphysical) reasons behind these occurrences similar to unexplained feats of strength that “normal” people experience in life saving (their own or loved ones) circumstances; the medical community often cites “adrenaline” as the cause but has never been able to prove that belief/statement (and they cannot because the “adrenaline” theory is false) – link below with examples:

http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/ ... rength.htm

In Eastern cultures, when this high level (scientific/metaphysical) ‘force’ is experienced to a significant degree, it is referred to as “chi” (in China), “prana” (in India) and “ki” (in Japan); in the West, of course, it is labeled as being “in the zone”.

If, after this additional ‘presentation’, a significant number (sincerely) do not think that I am competent and accurate in my findings/conclusions and still firmly believe that it is an “impossible” endeavor to decipher cross-era matchups (and nothing more will convince them otherwise), I will not proceed any further and focus my efforts elsewhere, concluding that either my findings are false or my presentations are lacking (or both).

Note: For optimal viewing, after pulling up the document link, it is recommend to close out the left panel (with the small sized pages) by clicking on the arrow (<) icon and then zoom (+) in TWICE; hence, all data can be best viewed.

Key: [l] = left; [r] = right; [c] = center; [a] = above; [s] = standing; [d] = down (for the count).

P.S.

Ideally, to be able to decipher any type of inquiry, the best viewpoint is that of a worldwide ‘ecosystem’; hence, various fields of study that may appear as non-related may actually be linked (directly or indirectly); one of the primary reasons that any general inquiry goes “unsolved” or is deemed “impossible” is due to the fact that those involved isolate the ‘matter’ (as if on a desert island) without ever even considering that other ‘matters’, however unrelated that they may appear to be, can actually be connected (somehow) and assist in resolving the ‘issue’.

P.P.S.

I am doing some high intensity multi-tasking over the next two plus weeks (as the year ends); hence, I may not be able to reply to any responses until at least (1/1/2013) but I will try to check in from time to time just in case there are some high noted concerns to be addressed/corrected.

Again, an extended Happy Holidays/New Year to all…..

Google Document Link:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4aMZQ ... F9CSGkzLWM
kal.majeed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 30 May 2011, 12:32

Re: Boxing/Sports Bonus Data: Past Elites are Better?

Post by kal.majeed »

Cross Era Stage 1 Secret Revealed

First, I have been able to regain access to my site but it is in major disarray and I will need at least two more weeks (perhaps a month) to complete ‘repair’ (at that point, depending upon responses and other aspects, I may release the final data).

As previously noted (in the first post), anyone is capable of extraordinary (almost superhuman) feats of strength – in certain circumstances. A mother (to protect children), possibly no greater in size than are boxing flyweights-featherweights, can battle and ward off a several hundred plus pound polar bear; another small sized mother (to save her son) can lift up a 3,000 plus pound vehicle.

http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/archives/ ... 17_03.html

These extraordinary events are well documented and cited in numerous medical journals (across the country and around the world); hence, the occurrences are accepted as fact. The only question is what exactly is responsible for these circumstances? It cannot be adrenaline since the theory contradicts itself as the amount of adrenaline that one will need to battle a bear or lift a car will incapacitate that individual (and possibly kill them); the medical community (without requiring an experiment) knows this and this is the primary reason that it has never been confirmed (for no one or group within the medical community will even attempt an obvious and likely death sentence – for a test subject).

The answer is multi-fold and will begin (for now) with two primary aspects that can be medically cited.

Neuropsychology:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuropsychology

Central Nervous System (two articles):

http://biology.about.com/od/organsystem ... system.htm

http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/i ... /brain.htm

These two fields of study/research are intertwined and are (in humans) the most advanced/complex of all animals/mammals. The central nervous system (CNS) controls and regulates virtually every aspect of bodily function (and not the reverse); hence, the adrenal glands and all other internal organs are the ‘employees’ and not the 'controller(s)'.

There are other vital aspects involved with one being able to function at extraordinarily high levels (physically/mentally) but that comes later; to prepare, however, one will need to understand at least some facets of the aforementioned medical fields.

“I started my professional activity as a neurologist trying to bring relief to my neurotic patients. Under the influence of an older friend and by my own efforts, I discovered some important new facts about the unconscious in psychic life, the role of instinctual urges, and so on. Out of these findings grew a new science, psychoanalysis, a part of psychology, and a new method of treatment of the neuroses. I had to pay heavily for this bit of good luck. People did not believe in my facts and thought my theories unsavory. Resistance was strong and unrelenting. In the end, I succeeded in acquiring pupils and building up an International Psychoanalytic Association. But the struggle is not yet over.” – Sigmund Freud (1856-1939; Austrian neurologist); University of Vienna (MD, 1881).

http://www.openculture.com/2012/05/sigm ... _1938.html

The below document link contains mostly new (and some newly revised) boxing/sports data – additional ‘prep type’ material. It is a nine page dossier with perspectives/details based upon three decades of research experience.

Note: For optimal viewing, after pulling up the document link, it is recommend to close out the left panel (with the small sized pages) by clicking on the arrow (<) icon and then zoom (+) in TWICE; hence, all data can be best viewed.

Google Document Link:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4aMZQ ... VRjMHR1WlU

P.S.

Again, with the rebuilding site process, I may not be able to respond (if any replies are posted) for a few days or more.

For those who celebrate it – Merry Christmas!
Post Reply