Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by palooka »

Smith seemed genuinely surprised at how hard Groves hit him and said that he weren't a real supermiddle and would move down to middle in order to compete. What has happened to change his mind? Anderson doesn't hit as hard as Groves but will take some shifting and hits plenty hard to do some damage.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by mickey1975 »

Smith would beat Anderson in a good fight and Groves would smash him (Anderson) to pieces second time round. It does not matter how hard Ken is out of the ring, he will be exposed...
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by slapbangwhallop »

mickey1975 wrote:Smith would beat Anderson in a good fight and Groves would smash him (Anderson) to pieces second time round. It does not matter how hard Ken is out of the ring, he will be exposed...
call him Ken and you'll find out just how hard he is outside of the ring! ;)
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by mickey1975 »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Smith would beat Anderson in a good fight and Groves would smash him (Anderson) to pieces second time round. It does not matter how hard Ken is out of the ring, he will be exposed...
call him Ken and you'll find out just how hard he is outside of the ring! ;)
I did that on purpose after reading an interview with him by Terry D!
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by righthook »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
righthook wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Me having been to nearly every show in Liverpool in the last 7 years
By saying smith is liverpools second highest ticket seller shows how little u know about boxing haha


Smith does sell allot of tickets but bellew fights in the echo arena and sells it out smith as of late has been fighting in the Olympia. So how do u come to that calculation????????????????


I have been watching boxing in Liverpool for 30 years mate so don't try sound like u know the ins an outa of Liverpool boxing
righthook wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Me having been to nearly every show in Liverpool in the last 7 years
By saying smith is liverpools second highest ticket seller shows how little u know about boxing haha



Smith does sell allot of tickets but bellew fights in the echo arena and sells it out smith as of late has been fighting in the Olympia. So how do u come to that calculation????????????????


I have been watching boxing in Liverpool for 30 years mate so don't try sound like u know the ins an outa of Liverpool boxing


Aright fanboy if I no so little answer me these question


1, When Bellew fought Ovill the first time why were people leaving during the entrance
2, Why was there at most 3000 in The Echo when he fought Danny Mac

and for me saying Smith being the second biggest seller he consistently fills out the Echo (Quigley,Dodson&DeGale) whereas Bellew filled it in a world title but when it was for the British the same title Smith was filling the Echo out with he struggled hence why Eddie has had him on the road because if Bellew sold the Echo out all the time that's where nearly all his fights would take place, so maybe I don't no the ins and outs like you least I no the facts and can look at thing without my rose tinted glasses
Listen to what your putting haha. Firstly bellew was an up N coming fighter when he fought ovil and he was not top of the bill.

Second you talk about smiths 3 fights. Quigly didson and degale. 2 local derbies that anyone from Liverpool would come out to see coz it's 2 scouserrs fighting and degale who everyone loves to hate. Lets also not forget to mention that where a top of the bill occasion.

No matter what you say you can not argue with the maths. Olympia holds 1500 echo holds 10,000 even if bellew sells a quater then that's more is it not ?????????
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by 15829 »

Quigley v Dodson never sold out and you forgot to mention Danny Mac
benji12345
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by benji12345 »

smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by 15829 »

benji12345 wrote:smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:

Tbh there all shit only ever won British, Commonwealth titles and countless other amateur trophies
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by LeedsLad »

Stephen could have a good career if he improved his current ring IQ of 0.

Plus, he's the worst inside fighter I've ever seen. Brutal stuff, against both Simpson and Selby.
Bleak
Cruiserweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 21 Oct 2010, 17:23

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by Bleak »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
benji12345 wrote:smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:

Tbh there all shit only ever won British, Commonwealth titles and countless other amateur trophies

They have done very very well, but the back slapping and biggin each other up is terrible, going on and on and on
cutthecacklebullyup
Cruiserweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 14:04

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by cutthecacklebullyup »

IMO joe Gallagher has ruined Stephen smith
Bleak
Cruiserweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 21 Oct 2010, 17:23

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by Bleak »

cutthecacklebullyup wrote:IMO joe Gallagher has ruined Stephen smith

Stephen was a very bright prospect but it hasn't happened for him this year, maybe your right, did he win the British Title with Joe ?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by billy nelson »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
benji12345 wrote:smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:

Tbh there all shit only ever won British, Commonwealth titles and countless other amateur trophies
Only won the British and Commonwealth? Well enlighten us all with your achievments :bag:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by hurlock »

billy nelson wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:
benji12345 wrote:smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:

Tbh there all shit only ever won British, Commonwealth titles and countless other amateur trophies
Only won the British and Commonwealth? Well enlighten us all with your achievments :bag:[/quote

Think he was being sarcastic willyarm!

& what is it with Kenny being addressed as ken?? Does he really get in a strop??if so he comes across as a bully & would he want good money for facing Paul smith??
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by whiskey »

Being paid on the night, fighting on a big sky HD production...

Smith will defo fight eventually. What else will the fella do, hang around for some WBO international title on some Excel undercard in 2014 ?

And if he wins, he's in the mix again (although in the wrong weight class)
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by 15829 »

billy nelson wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:
benji12345 wrote:smith verry overatid along with is brothers stephen is the best out of a bad bunch :lol:

Tbh there all shit only ever won British, Commonwealth titles and countless other amateur trophies
Only won the British and Commonwealth? Well enlighten us all with your achievments :bag:


Read the rest of the thread Hurlock is right I was being sarcastic
cutthecacklebullyup
Cruiserweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 14:04

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by cutthecacklebullyup »

Bleak wrote:
cutthecacklebullyup wrote:IMO joe Gallagher has ruined Stephen smith

Stephen was a very bright prospect but it hasn't happened for him this year, maybe your right, did he win the British Title with Joe ?
Just think he has turned into a typical Gallagher styled fighter as,taking too many shots , lack of head movement and general disregard for defence
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by righthook »

@markmcgee87 wrote:Quigley v Dodson never sold out and you forgot to mention Danny Mac
Danny mc sold around 3,500 I was there so is that not more than double the Olympia holds?????????

And again let's not forget the grand national and Liverpool v Everton was the week before, the fight re scheduled. For me that's a good turn out considering the facts!

I rate all the smiths by the way excellent boxers and future champions, but I think your the only one in th world who can say smith sells more tickets when he has been fighing in the Olympia.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by hurlock »

Wot is this! A scouse popularity contest!

Scousers know there boxing & football it's about all they do know!

I'd say smith had a good following doing well In the aba's & the games signed up with the big promoter & in the hot bed at Manchester. Since then he has not lived up to expectations.
Bellew has won domestic honours already & fought for a world title.
As said scousers know the sport & get behind there talent I think smith needs to win them back over. He's been cute in the past against Magee & look where he ended up. I hope the Anderson fight gets made it puts him back on top of the domestic pile
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by lillywhite14 »

Don't encourage em by saying they know their football and boxing!!! :wink:

From experience, the blues know their football more so than the reds, who have some of the most delusional fans in the world. As for boxing? Similar to the football really. Wide range. In reality they don't know their football or boxing anymore or any less than Mancs, cockneys, geordies etc etc

Remember though, nobody loves their nans like scousers do! :TU:
Adam1991
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 304
Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 07:00

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by Adam1991 »

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz to this thread now
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by kevo »

lillywhite14 wrote:Don't encourage em by saying they know their football and boxing!!! :wink:

From experience, the blues know their football more so than the reds, who have some of the most delusional fans in the world. As for boxing? Similar to the football really. Wide range. In reality they don't know their football or boxing anymore or any less than Mancs, cockneys, geordies etc etc

Remember though, nobody loves their nans like scousers do! :TU:
Jesus, don't tar us all with the same brush* :lol:

As much as i'd like to see this fight, Smith really needs to stay at middle.


*I do love my Nan though.
bynino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 182
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 09:36

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by bynino »

so do i
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by 15829 »

1 nans dead the others a bitch :OhYes:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul Smith v Kenny Anderson not happening

Post by leforge »

@markmcgee87 wrote:1 nans dead the others a bitch :OhYes:
U changed your name recently?
Post Reply