Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post Reply
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by orbtastic »

Maybe they feel Ward's not going to be active enough for them?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by dondada »

orbtastic wrote:Maybe they feel Ward's not going to be active enough for them?
:TU:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by orbtastic »

They're a law unto themselves most of the time.

I'd rather see reasonable matches and people being active, if that means titles are vacated or whatever, so be it.

I think Ward's slightly transcended titles - The super six has clearly proved him as the best of the bunch, the one thing that it hasn't proved as much is who the clear number 2 is. I guess the Froch/Kessler rematch may well clear that up but again, it's looking likely that it's going to have to transcend titles.
clubberlang
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 04:47

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by clubberlang »

What makes it worse is that the WBC is the best of the bunch. :doh:
Jack B
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 324
Joined: 18 Jan 2008, 13:51

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by Jack B »

From the WBC rule book:

"A WBC Champion Emeritus shall also be an Ambassador of Good Will on behalf of the WBC."

I'm sure Andre will be happy about that new role.

All of this is an irrelevance, really. Ward is the legit 168lbs World Champ, and he will stay that way unless he loses, retires or changes weight class. Everybody else (Froch included) is nothing more than a titlist and a contender to his throne.
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1942
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by Alba »

clubberlang wrote:What makes it worse is that the WBC is the best of the bunch. :doh:

i would say the IBF are slightly more credible, no interim champs as far as i know and will push a champ to defend against a mandatory most of the time
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23119
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by handsofstone »

Its the governing bodies International/Intercontinental belts that annoy me :cry:
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by m1kee50 »

handsofstone wrote:Its the governing bodies International/Intercontinental belts that annoy me :cry:
Point there. Gets sold as a 'title fight' ffs when its just meaningless. when did it stop being good enough to be European titlist or even a world-level contender? now everyone has to be a belt-holder, even though the fans know its bollocks.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Super-middle shenanigans at the WBC?

Post by stujones »

International / intercontinental titles were fine in their initial use, and had some meaning as a stepping stone. Now merely added to save a bill and safe refunds.
Post Reply