Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:44

Even fight now. This fight is sloppy as hell and definitely doesn't look like a Championship level fight.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:44

48-47 Smith

Hate scoring even rounds but I couldn't split them in the 5th

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:44

47 all.
Horse shit fight.

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:48

3-2, 1 even Smith.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:48

58-56 Smith

sockdolager · Post by **sockdolager** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:48

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:49

57-56 Smith.
Yawn.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:51

68-65 Smith

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:52

Farhood feels like scoring some of these rounds 7-7.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:52

Delighted Istayed up until 3.30am to watch this FOTY candidate...

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:52

Whoever wins this fight, I figure some young fighters at 154 gotta be chomping at the bit to get a shot at these guys.

James Kirkland, Alfredo Angulo, or hell probably a lot of other young guys, could beat either of these guys.

giacomino · Post by **giacomino** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:53

Perfect example of why alphabet belts are bullshit. Neither one of these guys are even remotely a champion or would have been top 10 a few decades ago

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:53

67-65 Smith.

thegerm · Post by **thegerm** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:54

lol its an ishe Smith fight... what were yall expecting?

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:55

Deno1986 wrote:Delighted Istayed up until 3.30am to watch this FOTY candidate...

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:55

Better round for K9, still a sorry ass fight.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:56

77-75 Smith

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:56

giacomino wrote:Perfect example of why alphabet belts are bullshit. Neither one of these guys are even remotely a champion or would have been top 10 a few decades ago

Diamond WEAPON · Post by **Diamond WEAPON** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:56

giacomino wrote:Perfect example of why alphabet belts are bullshit. Neither one of these guys are even remotely a champion or would have been top 10 a few decades ago

Thurman, Molina, and Andrade are al ranked by the IBF, I'd take all over either of these guys

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 23 Feb 2013, 23:57

76-75 Smith.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 24 Feb 2013, 00:00

87-84 Smith

Most exciting round of the fight by a mile.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 24 Feb 2013, 00:00

Diamond WEAPON wrote:
giacomino wrote:Perfect example of why alphabet belts are bullshit. Neither one of these guys are even remotely a champion or would have been top 10 a few decades ago
Thurman, Molina, and Andrade are al ranked by the IBF, I'd take all over either of these guys

x2

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 24 Feb 2013, 00:01

86-84 Smith.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 24 Feb 2013, 00:03

96-93 Smith.

Deno1986 · Post by **Deno1986** » 24 Feb 2013, 00:03

97-93 Smith.

Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.

Re: Bundrage/Smith and undercard RBR.