Michael Moorer v. Charles Williams.

[Rover]

How would this unification have gone? Moorer didn't do much at light heavy and struggled with Stewart, his best opponent at the weight, before blossoming at heavy.

[Dart340]

It's a great question, Rover. I don't remember how hard Moorer struggled with Stewart and have to go back and watch it again, but he seemed to completely annihilate a lot of solid guys and contenders. I always thought Moorer was probably underrated at the weight and I'd take him to get over the hump and get Williams out pretty quickly, but the "Prince" was a talented and durable guy so I could see making a case the other way as well. Your call?

[Rover]

It's a great question, Rover. I don't remember how hard Moorer struggled with Stewart and have to go back and watch it again, but he seemed to completely annihilate a lot of solid guys and contenders. I always thought Moorer was probably underrated at the weight and I'd take him to get over the hump and get Williams out pretty quickly, but the "Prince" was a talented and durable guy so I could see making a case the other way as well. Your call?

Williams. The Stuart fight was one in which I thought Moorer was well behind. Nobody got Williams out quickly in his prime. I think he'd take a decision.

[keithmoonhangover]

How would this unification have gone? Moorer didn't do much at light heavy and struggled with Stuart, his best opponent at the weight, before blossoming at heavy.

Don't you mean Stewart? Not Stuart.

[Rover]

How would this unification have gone? Moorer didn't do much at light heavy and struggled with Stuart, his best opponent at the weight, before blossoming at heavy.

Don't you mean Stewart? Not Stuart.

Yes.