Post Your Scorecards

Post Reply
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Seamus wrote:Ok, this one might shock some guys, and I just got around to finally seeing it in it's entirety

Miguel Cotto vs Paulie Malignaggi

R1 10-9 PM
R2 10-8 MC
R3 10-9 MC
R4 10-9 MC
R5 10-9 PM
R6 10-9 PM
R7 10-9 MC
R8 10-9 PM
R9 10-9 PM
R10 10-9 PM
R11 10-10 Even
R12 10-9 MC

114-114 A Draw

Cotto landed the harded punches, and Malignaggi's jaw and eye looked terrible, but Paulie's incredible work rate and toughness gained him the draw on my scorecard. There were simply too many rounds, where Cotto's inactivity while looking for one big punch, cost him.
Wow, shocked is an understatement. I had it 118-108.
I never saw that fight, but I've never heard anyone suggest it was close
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Seamus wrote:Ok, this one might shock some guys, and I just got around to finally seeing it in it's entirety

Miguel Cotto vs Paulie Malignaggi

R1 10-9 PM
R2 10-8 MC
R3 10-9 MC
R4 10-9 MC
R5 10-9 PM
R6 10-9 PM
R7 10-9 MC
R8 10-9 PM
R9 10-9 PM
R10 10-9 PM
R11 10-10 Even
R12 10-9 MC

114-114 A Draw

Cotto landed the harded punches, and Malignaggi's jaw and eye looked terrible, but Paulie's incredible work rate and toughness gained him the draw on my scorecard. There were simply too many rounds, where Cotto's inactivity while looking for one big punch, cost him.
Wow, shocked is an understatement. I had it 118-108.
I never saw that fight, but I've never heard anyone suggest it was close
I did, and it wasn't.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

Montell Griffin vs Rico Hoye: 116-112 Griffin, he got jobbed in that one.
Marvin Hagler vs Ray Leonard: 114-114 even
Antonio Tarver vs Glen Johnson 1: 114-114 even
Jermain Tayor vs Bernard Hopkins 1: 116-112 Taylor
Chris Byrd vs Davarryl Williamson: 116-115 Byrd (worst fight I've ever seen, could've been a draw as they both looked like losers to me)

Carlos Hernandez vs Bobby Pacquiao: 97-92 Hernandez, he was robbed in this one.
Jermain Taylor vs Bernard Hopkins II: 114-114 even
Jermain Taylor vs Winky Wright: 116-112 Taylor
Ike Quartey vs Vernon Forrest: 97-92 Quartey, he was robbed in this one
Floyd Mayweather vs Oscar De La Hoya: 117-111 Mayweather
Jermain Taylor vs Cory Spinks: 115-113 Spinks...Piss poor performance from Taylor despite the fact that he got the decision.

That's enough for now, I can say specifically which rounds I gave to each fighter if anyone is interested. Just name which fight you're curious about and I'll get back to you.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

Sweet pea vs Chavez 117-112. 8-3-1 for Whitaker, horrible decision
Taylor Hopkins 1 I had 114-114
RadioElRadar
Super Middleweight
Posts: 292
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 04:35

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by RadioElRadar »

A few from close and/or contentious fights:

Micky Ward v Emanuel Augustus - 95-94 Augustus (Ward UD)
Micky Ward v Arturo Gatti (I) - 95-93 Gatti (Ward MD)

James Toney v Mike McCallum (I) - 115-114 Toney (Draw)
James Toney v Mike McCallum (II) - 115-113 Toney (Toney MD)

Thomas Hearns v Ray Leonard (II) - 115-112 Hearns (Draw)

Pernell Whitaker v Julio César Chávez - 117-111 Whitaker (Draw)
RazorKO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 612
Joined: 31 Oct 2005, 13:20

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by RazorKO »

Mercer vs Lewis. 118-110 for Mercer. Robbery of the decade.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

So you had Mercer winning 10 rds to 2 ? It was a 10 rounder :OhYes:
RazorKO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 612
Joined: 31 Oct 2005, 13:20

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by RazorKO »

8 rounds to 2 i mean. Mercer outboxed, out jabbed, out muscled and out punched Lewis.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I remember having that one 96-94 for Mercer, but a draw would have been reasonable. It was a close, entertaining fight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

RadioElRadar wrote:A few from close and/or contentious fights:

Micky Ward v Emanuel Augustus - 95-94 Augustus (Ward UD)
Micky Ward v Arturo Gatti (I) - 95-93 Gatti (Ward MD)

James Toney v Mike McCallum (I) - 115-114 Toney (Draw)
James Toney v Mike McCallum (II) - 115-113 Toney (Toney MD)

Thomas Hearns v Ray Leonard (II) - 115-112 Hearns (Draw)

Pernell Whitaker v Julio César Chávez - 117-111 Whitaker (Draw)
I think I had the same score for Gatti-Ward I. Gatti won the first 3 rounds pretty clear in my opinion with superior boxing, the 4th was close but since Ward sucked Gatti into his fight (which he did a little bit of in Round 3) I gave him that round, he also lost a point though. In the 5th Ward batters Gatti badly at the end of the round to take that round big. I feel like Gatti boxes well again in the 6th and 7th to take 2 more rounds. But then Ward beats the crap out of him in the 8th and 9th rounds...about as severe a beating as you'll see a guy take in the 9th round without being stopped, could easily be acceptable as a 10-7 round in Ward's favor, I scored it 10-8 personally because through it all Gatti was fighting back...and then after getting the living hell beaten out of him in the 9th, Gatti wins the 10th round on my card. But yeah, if you score the 3rd for Ward and a 10-7 round for him in the 9th. It becomes a victory in his favor, and I can certainly see why a judge would've had that score.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Gatti landed too many shots for 10-7. I was happy Mick won but I also thought Arturo edged it and I never gave Ward much of a chance in parts 2 and 3. Perhaps that's why I think the trilogy is overrated as a whole, the last two were anti-climatic. But round nine was the greatest thing ever.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

Ward/Gatti I: 95-93 Ward
1: 10-9 Gatti
2: 10-9 Gatti
3: 10-9 Ward
4: 10-8 Ward (Gatti lost point)
5: 10-9 Ward
6: 10-9 Gatti
7: 10-9 Gatti
8: 10-9 Ward
9: 10-8 Ward
10: 10-9 Gatti
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
RadioElRadar wrote:A few from close and/or contentious fights:

Micky Ward v Emanuel Augustus - 95-94 Augustus (Ward UD)
Micky Ward v Arturo Gatti (I) - 95-93 Gatti (Ward MD)

James Toney v Mike McCallum (I) - 115-114 Toney (Draw)
James Toney v Mike McCallum (II) - 115-113 Toney (Toney MD)

Thomas Hearns v Ray Leonard (II) - 115-112 Hearns (Draw)

Pernell Whitaker v Julio César Chávez - 117-111 Whitaker (Draw)
I think I had the same score for Gatti-Ward I. Gatti won the first 3 rounds pretty clear in my opinion with superior boxing, the 4th was close but since Ward sucked Gatti into his fight (which he did a little bit of in Round 3) I gave him that round, he also lost a point though. In the 5th Ward batters Gatti badly at the end of the round to take that round big. I feel like Gatti boxes well again in the 6th and 7th to take 2 more rounds. But then Ward beats the crap out of him in the 8th and 9th rounds...about as severe a beating as you'll see a guy take in the 9th round without being stopped, could easily be acceptable as a 10-7 round in Ward's favor, I scored it 10-8 personally because through it all Gatti was fighting back...and then after getting the living hell beaten out of him in the 9th, Gatti wins the 10th round on my card. But yeah, if you score the 3rd for Ward and a 10-7 round for him in the 9th. It becomes a victory in his favor, and I can certainly see why a judge would've had that score.
Are you saying Ward lost a point in the fourth?
It was Gatti.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Finally found the last 2 rounds of Chavez v Laporte so my final score was Julio Cesar Chavez W 115-113 Juan LaPorte. That strong performance by LaPorte makes Barry McGuigan's clearer cut victory over him look all the better.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

Seamus wrote:Finally found the last 2 rounds of Chavez v Laporte so my final score was Julio Cesar Chavez W 115-113 Juan LaPorte. That strong performance by LaPorte makes Barry McGuigan's clearer cut victory over him look all the better.
Laporte was quite inconsistent. Hayes beat him in his prime.
RadioElRadar
Super Middleweight
Posts: 292
Joined: 04 Dec 2012, 04:35

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by RadioElRadar »

Rover wrote:Ward/Gatti I: 95-93 Ward
1: 10-9 Gatti
2: 10-9 Gatti
3: 10-9 Ward
4: 10-8 Ward (Gatti lost point)
5: 10-9 Ward
6: 10-9 Gatti
7: 10-9 Gatti
8: 10-9 Ward
9: 10-8 Ward
10: 10-9 Gatti
I had it the same except for rounds 3 and 4. So:

1: 10-9 Gatti
2: 10-9 Gatti
3: 10-9 Gatti
4: 9-9 Even (Gatti lost point, I had him winning the round)
5: 10-9 Ward
6: 10-9 Gatti
7: 10-9 Gatti
8: 10-9 Ward
9: 10-8 Ward
10: 10-9 Gatti

95-93 Gatti.

I've read quite a few ppl scoring this wide for Gatti (particularly in the wake of his HoF induction announcement) but I can't see it being anything other than dead even or razor-thin either way.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
RadioElRadar wrote:A few from close and/or contentious fights:

Micky Ward v Emanuel Augustus - 95-94 Augustus (Ward UD)
Micky Ward v Arturo Gatti (I) - 95-93 Gatti (Ward MD)

James Toney v Mike McCallum (I) - 115-114 Toney (Draw)
James Toney v Mike McCallum (II) - 115-113 Toney (Toney MD)

Thomas Hearns v Ray Leonard (II) - 115-112 Hearns (Draw)

Pernell Whitaker v Julio César Chávez - 117-111 Whitaker (Draw)
I think I had the same score for Gatti-Ward I. Gatti won the first 3 rounds pretty clear in my opinion with superior boxing, the 4th was close but since Ward sucked Gatti into his fight (which he did a little bit of in Round 3) I gave him that round, he also lost a point though. In the 5th Ward batters Gatti badly at the end of the round to take that round big. I feel like Gatti boxes well again in the 6th and 7th to take 2 more rounds. But then Ward beats the crap out of him in the 8th and 9th rounds...about as severe a beating as you'll see a guy take in the 9th round without being stopped, could easily be acceptable as a 10-7 round in Ward's favor, I scored it 10-8 personally because through it all Gatti was fighting back...and then after getting the living hell beaten out of him in the 9th, Gatti wins the 10th round on my card. But yeah, if you score the 3rd for Ward and a 10-7 round for him in the 9th. It becomes a victory in his favor, and I can certainly see why a judge would've had that score.
Are you saying Ward lost a point in the fourth?
It was Gatti.
No I just worded it poorly, I remember clearly Gatti losing the point. Real hard low-blow. I scored that round even too as I thought Gatti got it otherwise, but Round 4 was definitely a round that was up for debate as Ward had a pretty good round there too.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Gatti landed too many shots for 10-7. I was happy Mick won but I also thought Arturo edged it and I never gave Ward much of a chance in parts 2 and 3. Perhaps that's why I think the trilogy is overrated as a whole, the last two were anti-climatic. But round nine was the greatest thing ever.
I personally agree with you that's why I scored it 10-8 in Ward's favor, but you gotta admit you'll seldom see a guy the living hell beat out of him like Gatti got towards the end of that round and still be standing when it's over. But yeah, Gatti landed most of the punches during the middle portion of the round. Even though they didn't have a lot of steam on them, Ward didn't do much between the 2:00 and 1:00 minute mark.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Gatti landed too many shots for 10-7. I was happy Mick won but I also thought Arturo edged it and I never gave Ward much of a chance in parts 2 and 3. Perhaps that's why I think the trilogy is overrated as a whole, the last two were anti-climatic. But round nine was the greatest thing ever.
I personally agree with you that's why I scored it 10-8 in Ward's favor, but you gotta admit you'll seldom see a guy the living hell beat out of him like Gatti got towards the end of that round and still be standing when it's over. But yeah, Gatti landed most of the punches during the middle portion of the round. Even though they didn't have a lot of steam on them, Ward didn't do much between the 2:00 and 1:00 minute mark.
Didn't one dumbass judge score the first round of Ward/Burton 10-7 for Ward?
:lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by gilgamesh »

Rover wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Gatti landed too many shots for 10-7. I was happy Mick won but I also thought Arturo edged it and I never gave Ward much of a chance in parts 2 and 3. Perhaps that's why I think the trilogy is overrated as a whole, the last two were anti-climatic. But round nine was the greatest thing ever.
I personally agree with you that's why I scored it 10-8 in Ward's favor, but you gotta admit you'll seldom see a guy the living hell beat out of him like Gatti got towards the end of that round and still be standing when it's over. But yeah, Gatti landed most of the punches during the middle portion of the round. Even though they didn't have a lot of steam on them, Ward didn't do much between the 2:00 and 1:00 minute mark.
Didn't one dumbass judge score the first round of Ward/Burton 10-7 for Ward?
:lol:
I wouldn't doubt it if he scored the knockdown round that way.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

James Toney vs Vassiliy Jirov

R1. 10-9 JT
R2. 10-9 VJ
R3. 10-9 JT
R4. 10-9 VJ
R5. 10-9 JT
R6. 10-10
R7. 10-9 JT
R8. 9-9 Even Pt taken from VJ
R9. 10-9 VJ
R10.10-9 JT
R11.10-9 VJ
R12.10-8 JT

115-112 James Toney

One of the best fights of the 21st century. Back and forth non stop action. But the scoring was ridiculous.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Rover »

Toney/Jirov:
1: 10-9 Toney
2: 10-9 Jirov
3: 10-9 Toney
4: 10-9 Jirov
5: 10-9 Toney
6: 10-9 Toney
7: 10-9 Toney
8: 9-9
9: 10-9 Jirov
10: 10-9 Toney
11: 10-9 Jirov
12: 10-8 Toney
Total: 115-111 Toney
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Joey Giardello vs Rubin "Hurricane' Carter

R1. 5-4 RC
R2. 5-4 JG
R3. 5-5 Even
R4. 5-4 RC
R5. 5-4 JG
R6. 5-4 RC
R7. 5-4 JG
R8. 5-4 JG
R9. 5-5 Even
R10. 5-4 JG
R11. 5-5 Even
R12. 5-4 JG
R13. 5-4 JG
R14. 5-4 JG
R15 5-4 RC

Joey Giardello 71-67

I love Giardello's counter to the body.
MEISINGER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by MEISINGER »

Seamus wrote:James Toney vs Vassiliy Jirov

R1. 10-9 JT
R2. 10-9 VJ
R3. 10-9 JT
R4. 10-9 VJ
R5. 10-9 JT
R6. 10-10
R7. 10-9 JT
R8. 9-9 Even Pt taken from VJ
R9. 10-9 VJ
R10.10-9 JT
R11.10-9 VJ
R12.10-8 JT

115-112 James Toney

One of the best fights of the 21st century. Back and forth non stop action. But the scoring was ridiculous.
i do not recall my exact score card but i know i had it to toney by a round or two tops

one hell of a fight
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Joey Maxim vs Sugar Ray Robinson
R1-12 all for SRR
R13 JM

Sugar Robinson 12-1
Post Reply