Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post Reply
Esquire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 21 Oct 2008, 22:55

Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Esquire »

Don't get crazy on me. I'm just asking. No boxer I've seen in my lifetime separated another human being from his senses like this cat.

Some good wins, some bad losses to good fighters. But what power this fella had. Like knock you dead power.

Opinions please. He fought HOF'ers Mccallum and Norris and some really good fighters like McClellan, Graham, and even Drayton, and some other good fighters with mixed results.

Does he belong in Canastota? The dude could level a building with either hand.

I say yes, he's deserving.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Rover »

Do you think Kalambay belongs?
He beat McCallum, Barkley and Graham.
Jackson also beat Graham plus Norris.
Barkley>Drayton.
Graham: They both beat him.
McCallum>Norris.
This one's a tough call for me (whether Jackson gets in, as he had only one loss in nearly 50 fights), but Sumbu's more deserving than Jackson, I'd say.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Rover »

To add a little to Jackson's case, he had wins over Thomas Tate and In-Chul Beak, who won a belt at super middle later on.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15544
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by giacomino »

No
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Rover »

giacomino wrote:No
I've thought about it, and I've decided the same.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Definitely not.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46494
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by gilgamesh »

One of the single hardest hitters with one shot I've ever seen in the sport. Possibly THE hardest hitter. I wasn't able to follow his career all the way through so I'm only aware of a few highlight reel KO's and some losses, but I've always been a fan of Julian since he came to my attention. I wouldn't be upset if he got into the HOF.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Bricks »

Given the laughable precedent of barry mcguigan in the hall than there isnt any way kalambay or jackson can be kept out forever but on merit no.both were good to very fighters in a strong era but not near great altho kalambay was a level higher than jackson.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I for one think Jackson should be in there. I don't think that HOF entry should be based solely on a fighter's record. I think the impact on the sport is also important and by that rationale, I would have Buster Douglas in there. The day after Buster beat Tyson, it shared the front page of my morning newspaper with Nelson Mandela's release from prison.

I also wouldn't allow any fighters into the HOF that that have tested positive for PEDs. No way, no how. No drug cheats allowed.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Rover »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I for one think Jackson should be in there. I don't think that HOF entry should be based solely on a fighter's record. I think the impact on the sport is also important and by that rationale, I would have Buster Douglas in there. The day after Buster beat Tyson, it shared the front page of my morning newspaper with Nelson Mandela's release from prison.

I also wouldn't allow any fighters into the HOF that that have tested positive for PEDs. No way, no how. No drug cheats allowed.
Agree on drug cheats, but that'll never happen; Hill just got in.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Rover »

mugabi wrote:Given the laughable precedent of barry mcguigan in the hall than there isnt any way kalambay or jackson can be kept out forever but on merit no.both were good to very fighters in a strong era but not near great altho kalambay was a level higher than jackson.
Gatti's induction was worse.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by King Carlos »

Both Kalambay and Jackson are absolutely deserving.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15170
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I don't think Jackson did quite enough. Had he beat McClellan or McCallum than he would have a much better case.
JMac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2308
Joined: 06 Sep 2007, 14:41

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by JMac »

Whether he deserves it or not, he is one of the nicest guys you would ever meet. I got to know him when he was coaching the USVI national team that included his sons, one of whom boxed in the Beijing Olympics and who are now pros. I say yes because he beat Drayton who gave me my 1st loss as an amateur. I wish I could have hit Drayton like the Hawk did! :OhYes:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Julian Jackson HOF'er

Post by keithmoonhangover »

JMac wrote:Whether he deserves it or not, he is one of the nicest guys you would ever meet. I got to know him when he was coaching the USVI national team that included his sons, one of whom boxed in the Beijing Olympics and who are now pros. I say yes because he beat Drayton who gave me my 1st loss as an amateur. I wish I could have hit Drayton like the Hawk did! :OhYes:
:wave:
Post Reply