The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Who's to blame?

British Boxers
2
2%
Foreign Boxers
1
1%
Matchroom
18
20%
The Internet
15
16%
George & Francis
13
14%
Steve Bunce
13
14%
George Groves
14
15%
Richard "The Secret" Williams
15
16%
 
Total votes: 91

Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4533
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by NazNaci1 »

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.
No, not really. However we are digressing.
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

bengulnaci1 wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
bengulnaci1 wrote: His channel really only appeals to fans of the sport. So I naturally assume (possibly incorrectly) that those who subscribe are Boxing fans, first and foremost.
Thats a bit like saying anyone who subscribes to the adult channel is a sexual deviant, first and foremost.
No, not really. However we are digressing.
no shit
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by Deserter »

Finn wrote:
Deserter wrote: I'm more than satisfied with that response as I think it says it all for everyone to see in terms of your stance.
PS. The father reference was clearly a tongue-in-cheek one continuing the 'father' theme you first introduced, but that clearly went over your head, hence your somewhat bizarre need to assert his business credentials :TU:
Tongue in cheek? i was being serious about your dad. Keyboard warrior :bow: My stance is unless its got too much to do with boxing i discuss it on the off topic board at my choosing, if i wanted to discuss business in depth i'd go on a business forum and speak to people who actually have more than an inflated self notion of their knowledge. I was giving a glancing statement before you started having a geekgasm.
:lol: Calm down fella. Clearly I apologise for asking questions about the viability of Britain's only dedicated boxing subscription channel on a British boxing forum, it's clearly inappropriate. Feel free to continue ducking my perfectly legitimate questions and carry on as you are :TU:
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:So do some of you people think boxing is going to be "better" now that Mr Warren is having a rough period?
I think Allegedly channel could become better as a result of Warren's downfall. Boxing in general won't really improve or decline with him failing though IMO.
Without bothering to go and look this up, i always thought that over the last 25 years or so, when Mr Warren was the dominant force in British boxing, general interest was at its highest. When he had a bad patch, British boxing tended to fade into the background.
He's irrelevant these days really. If he said right now I'm never promoting another show or fight it would make no difference to me whatsoever.

I don't subscribe to allegedly. If I really want to watch something on it I have the means and he rarely if ever puts on fights that I'd go to the trouble of taking time outgo watch.

Matchrooms show last night was pretty poor- but miles better then what were used to from anyone else.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by Finn »

Deserter wrote:
Finn wrote:
Deserter wrote: I'm more than satisfied with that response as I think it says it all for everyone to see in terms of your stance.
PS. The father reference was clearly a tongue-in-cheek one continuing the 'father' theme you first introduced, but that clearly went over your head, hence your somewhat bizarre need to assert his business credentials :TU:
Tongue in cheek? i was being serious about your dad. Keyboard warrior :bow: My stance is unless its got too much to do with boxing i discuss it on the off topic board at my choosing, if i wanted to discuss business in depth i'd go on a business forum and speak to people who actually have more than an inflated self notion of their knowledge. I was giving a glancing statement before you started having a geekgasm.
:lol: Calm down fella. Clearly I apologise for asking questions about the viability of Britain's only dedicated boxing subscription channel on a British boxing forum, it's clearly inappropriate. Feel free to continue ducking my perfectly legitimate questions and carry on as you are :TU:
Image
Im not ducking your questions i just didnt read them, i did tell you that, your post was already too anal and boring 1 sentence in :KO:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: The Demise of Warren - whose fault?

Post by palooka »

Give it a fuckin rest
Post Reply