Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post Reply
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46503
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by gilgamesh »

I was thinking of this one the other day thumbing through one of my old Ring Mag's and seeing pictures of Roy fighting John Ruiz.

What if: Roy after beating John Ruiz doesn't come back to Light Heavy and stays at Heavy. Tarver chases him up to Heavy and in an effort to make a statement that he's just as good as Roy, he fights John Ruiz. So this would be in late 2003 or mid 2004. What happens?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46503
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by gilgamesh »

I think John Ruiz makes it an ugly fight, like he did with most of his opponents, and Tarver doesn't have the footspeed and legs to move around Ruiz the way Roy did. John hugs and mugs his way to a 116-112 decision victory...wouldn't be the most shocking thing if he dropped Tarver with one of those overhand rights. Tarver would be trying to catch Ruiz with straight lefts on the way in, and he'd do it sometimes, but he wouldn't have the power at Heavyweight to drop Ruiz. He'd win a few rounds when he upped the aggression, but Ruiz would win most rounds by forcing Tarver to fight his fight.
MEISINGER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by MEISINGER »

ruiz was boring as hell
but effective...he wins a snooze fest over tarver
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by misterpunch »

i'm sorry, no disrespect, but any thread that includes the words "john ruiz" automatically gets the :zzz: from me
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46503
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by gilgamesh »

misterpunch wrote:i'm sorry, no disrespect, but any thread that includes the words "john ruiz" automatically gets the :zzz: from me
:lol: I don't blame you, this certainly wouldn't have been an exciting fight. The thought of it just intrigued me for whatever reason.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by HomicideHenry »

Good old John Ruiz, you could set it to the watch, every ten seconds there was a clinch. However, he was tough, took a good punch, and while not having good hand speed he did have a very sneaky right. Willing to face anyone. Can't say that for most guys. Whether anyone likes it or not he is indeed a 2x heavyweight champion. As for this hypothetical, I dont know whether Tarver would of had the conditioning, speed, or punch to of discouraged Ruiz the way Toney, Jones and Haye did. I think Ruiz could beat Tarver, but its one of those 50/50-60/40 propositions that are hard to call.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by Rover »

misterpunch wrote:i'm sorry, no disrespect, but any thread that includes the words "john ruiz" automatically gets the :zzz: from me
:lol:
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by Rover »

gilgamesh wrote:I think John Ruiz makes it an ugly fight, like he did with most of his opponents, and Tarver doesn't have the footspeed and legs to move around Ruiz the way Roy did. John hugs and mugs his way to a 116-112 decision victory...wouldn't be the most shocking thing if he dropped Tarver with one of those overhand rights. Tarver would be trying to catch Ruiz with straight lefts on the way in, and he'd do it sometimes, but he wouldn't have the power at Heavyweight to drop Ruiz. He'd win a few rounds when he upped the aggression, but Ruiz would win most rounds by forcing Tarver to fight his fight.
Agreed.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

MEISINGER wrote:ruiz was boring as hell
but effective...he wins a snooze fest over tarver
And he was tough as hell as he took an utter shallacking for 9 rounds against David Haye before he was pulled out by his corner... As for this one and for that I give him a fair chance against Tarver at Heavyweight but Tarver has too much guile..
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by Rover »

IRLangmaid25 wrote:
MEISINGER wrote:ruiz was boring as hell
but effective...he wins a snooze fest over tarver
And he was tough as hell as he took an utter shallacking for 9 rounds against David Haye before he was pulled out by his corner... As for this one and for that I give him a fair chance against Tarver at Heavyweight but Tarver has too much guile..
Just goes to show how destructive Tua could be.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Antonio Tarver vs John Ruiz

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

Rover wrote:
IRLangmaid25 wrote:
MEISINGER wrote:ruiz was boring as hell
but effective...he wins a snooze fest over tarver
And he was tough as hell as he took an utter shallacking for 9 rounds against David Haye before he was pulled out by his corner... As for this one and for that I give him a fair chance against Tarver at Heavyweight but Tarver has too much guile..
Just goes to show how destructive Tua could be.
Aye it does... Tua was an utter animal in the ring unless he was facing a bloke who had a good jab...
Post Reply