Warren decides against injunction

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 14 Oct 2005, 13:42

More at BBN

http://www.britishboxing.net/?page=news&id=979

states · Post by **states** » 14 Oct 2005, 14:17

Hmm, not sure I can agree with Ricky that he was being put in with dangerous fighters all the time, and that Frank didn't care about his best interests. Still, this does suggest that Frank might be accepting that it's over, as long as he gets compensated.

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 14 Oct 2005, 14:36

Ricky continues in his statement by saying that "allegedly would put me into whatever fights as made the most money for them as quickly as possible. They would put me into three successive brutal defences against the best fighters in the world regardless of the fact that that would not be appropriate course for me, my health or career".

Three successive brutal defences? Hatton has had 1 brutal fight against Tszyu and plenty of easy nights. Making a statement like that is just plain ridiculous.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 14 Oct 2005, 16:26

Hatton might be going the way Naz and Coneteh did.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 14 Oct 2005, 18:38

So that press release in English please?

Does this mean that Hatton vs Maussa will definately go ahead as planned?

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 14 Oct 2005, 19:09

I believe he won't try and stop the fight happening but will still claim compensation etc from Hatton for breach of contract

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 17 Oct 2005, 08:05

Humble pie at SN head office by the sounds of it!

THEBUTCH · Post by **THEBUTCH** » 17 Oct 2005, 09:50

Hatton's gone (for now) and Warren had better get used it.

He's lost, so now he can start hatching more little schemes to get back at Ricky in the adult manner we've come to expect from him.

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2005, 09:55

nickd wrote:
Ricky continues in his statement by saying that "allegedly allegedly would put me into whatever fights as made the most money for them as quickly as possible. They would put me into three successive brutal defences against the best fighters in the world regardless of the fact that that would not be appropriate course for me, my health or career".
Three successive brutal defences? Hatton has had 1 brutal fight against Tszyu and plenty of easy nights. Making a statement like that is just plain ridiculous.

Does that mean hes going to step away from the top P4P Comp of brutes like Vilches and Pederson and step down the comp

CHEEKY B******

Also don't miss Billy telling us like it is:

"Ricky's trainer Billy Graham stated recently on Sky Sports Ringside programme: "do I fancy him [Maussa] for Ricky? I don't think anybody would really pay to see it."

BunglesFingers · Post by **BunglesFingers** » 17 Oct 2005, 09:55

I see that FW also had a pop at Fight Academy for not being licenced promoters

http://www.secondsout.com/UK/news.cfm?ccs=228&cs=17656

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 17 Oct 2005, 09:55

stujones wrote:So that press release in English please?

Does this mean that Hatton vs Maussa will definately go ahead as planned?

No its too much of a 'BRUTAL DEFENSE'