Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by saturday_kid »

Why have boxrec got this fight on the schedule for the undercard to Froch Kessler??
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by dondada »

Because it's been announced by the Board.

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2013/all-la ... ws-bbboc-1

I suppose it's a bit of insurance for Tony if the wheels come off for him on 30th March. Common sense, I suppose.

However, if Tony wins on 30th, I really hope he vacates and let's Bob fight for it against someone else.
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Chris W 1982 »

Could also be a keep busy fight as Dawson is set to face Stevenson in June
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by dondada »

Chris W 1982 wrote:Could also be a keep busy fight as Dawson is set to face Stevenson in June
Don't you think that would be a bit of a risk pal? Obviously Tony has improved since their first fight (when Bob had him over, think on) but so has Bob.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by TJ77 »

Top bloke Bob Ajisafe long over due this fight hope he can do it .I like Bellew good character but would love to see Bob get another title.
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Chris W 1982 »

dondada wrote:
Chris W 1982 wrote:Could also be a keep busy fight as Dawson is set to face Stevenson in June
Don't you think that would be a bit of a risk pal? Obviously Tony has improved since their first fight (when Bob had him over, think on) but so has Bob.

If Dawson fight is not made until around autumn then it would mean Bellew spending maybe 6/7 months out of the ring. Ajisafe is also a southpaw which could help with Dawson task.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by 15829 »

Bellew should of been stripped/vacated he clearly has no interest in defending the belt and it's put the division on hold the board should order a 4 man tournament with McKenzie v Mcintosh and Ajisafe v Maccarinelli with the winners fighting for the vacant title
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by rhino222 »

Bob deserves a tilt, if Bellew wins his eliminator he should give up the british title, does he own the belt yet?..
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Horse »

@markmcgee87 wrote:Bellew should of been stripped/vacated he clearly has no interest in defending the belt and it's put the division on hold the board should order a 4 man tournament with McKenzie v Mcintosh and Ajisafe v Maccarinelli with the winners fighting for the vacant title
If he doesn't fight Ajisafe he will be stripped.

I think Bellew vs Ajisafe is a good keeping busy fight for Bellew.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by 15829 »

He's not defended it once since he won the vacant belt against McIntosh 11 months ago
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by 15829 »

Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Bellew should of been stripped/vacated he clearly has no interest in defending the belt and it's put the division on hold the board should order a 4 man tournament with McKenzie v Mcintosh and Ajisafe v Maccarinelli with the winners fighting for the vacant title
If he doesn't fight Ajisafe he will be stripped.

I think Bellew vs Ajisafe is a good keeping busy fight for Bellew.

So for a PPV card your happy with a keep busy fight as part of the card
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Horse »

@markmcgee87 wrote:So for a PPV card your happy with a keep busy fight as part of the card
That depends on what else is on the undercard.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28529
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Coco »

Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:So for a PPV card your happy with a keep busy fight as part of the card
That depends on what else is on the undercard.
It's a keep busy fight because Bellow has bigger ambitions, but this is still a genuine British title fight, the last one was a cracker.
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Alba »

i cant remeber the last time a british champion fought for a World title and a title eliminator while still champion! Love Tony , one of the characters of boxing
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Finn »

He's already beaten ajisafe though i remember losing £68 quid betting on a bellew ko :lol:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by whiskey »

Bob is an improved fighter nowadays.
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by wrimc »

I prefer if Tony holds onto the British belt in all honesty. I wish this was the case right across the board. I dont think its right that as soon as that particular fighter has ambitions beyond British level they should have to give it up. They arestill legitimately the best fighter in the country at that weight in Britain.

By vacating the belt all it does is facilitate lower level fighters to become British champions. No disrespect to Gethin but is he even in the top 5 lightweights in the country at the moment?

Burns, Mitchell, Murray, Rees, Crolla, Matthews I thinks all have a case for being ranked above. Only one maybe two of those fighters you could say is at world level. I see the argument for keeping the belt active but surely it devalues the belt if you are getting two fighters in the latter half of a British top 10 competing for a vacant belt.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by dondada »

wrimc wrote:I prefer if Tony holds onto the British belt in all honesty. I wish this was the case right across the board. I dont think its right that as soon as that particular fighter has ambitions beyond British level they should have to give it up. They arestill legitimately the best fighter in the country at that weight in Britain.

By vacating the belt all it does is facilitate lower level fighters to become British champions. No disrespect to Gethin but is he even in the top 5 lightweights in the country at the moment?

Burns, Mitchell, Murray, Rees, Crolla, Matthews I thinks all have a case for being ranked above. Only one maybe two of those fighters you could say is at world level. I see the argument for keeping the belt active but surely it devalues the belt if you are getting two fighters in the latter half of a British top 10 competing for a vacant belt.
Understand where you're coming from but defend or vacate IMO.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by 15829 »

dondada wrote:
wrimc wrote:I prefer if Tony holds onto the British belt in all honesty. I wish this was the case right across the board. I dont think its right that as soon as that particular fighter has ambitions beyond British level they should have to give it up. They arestill legitimately the best fighter in the country at that weight in Britain.

By vacating the belt all it does is facilitate lower level fighters to become British champions. No disrespect to Gethin but is he even in the top 5 lightweights in the country at the moment?

Burns, Mitchell, Murray, Rees, Crolla, Matthews I thinks all have a case for being ranked above. Only one maybe two of those fighters you could say is at world level. I see the argument for keeping the belt active but surely it devalues the belt if you are getting two fighters in the latter half of a British top 10 competing for a vacant belt.
Understand where you're coming from but defend or vacate IMO.

11 months is a joke
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Bomber 1 »

@markmcgee87 wrote:He's not defended it once since he won the vacant belt against McIntosh 11 months ago

I won it against McKenzie and defended it against McIntosh! I've always stated I refuse to vacate titles! It's not the right thing to do IMHO.. I worked hard to become British Champion and worked even harder defending it! All ill say on this matter is don't believe a fight is happening until you hear it from myself. :TU:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Finn »

Bomber 1 wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:He's not defended it once since he won the vacant belt against McIntosh 11 months ago

I won it against McKenzie and defended it against McIntosh! I've always stated I refuse to vacate titles! It's not the right thing to do IMHO.. I worked hard to become British Champion and worked even harder defending it! All ill say on this matter is don't believe a fight is happening until you hear it from myself. :TU:
well there it is :TU:
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by 15829 »

Bomber 1 wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:He's not defended it once since he won the vacant belt against McIntosh 11 months ago

I won it against McKenzie and defended it against McIntosh! I've always stated I refuse to vacate titles! It's not the right thing to do IMHO.. I worked hard to become British Champion and worked even harder defending it! All ill say on this matter is don't believe a fight is happening until you hear it from myself. :TU:

My mistake but if you was 1 of the other light heavy you'd be screaming blue murder if the champion hadn't defended the belt in 11 months your clearly above British level and it's obviously a insurance policy if thing don't work out on the 30th, am a big fan I'll be there on the 30th cheering you on but I don't think you should hold the division up
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by TJ77 »

G0mez wrote:Bob is an improved fighter nowadays.
He did a pretty decent impression of a good fighter the first time round.
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Bomber 1 »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
Bomber 1 wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:He's not defended it once since he won the vacant belt against McIntosh 11 months ago

I won it against McKenzie and defended it against McIntosh! I've always stated I refuse to vacate titles! It's not the right thing to do IMHO.. I worked hard to become British Champion and worked even harder defending it! All ill say on this matter is don't believe a fight is happening until you hear it from myself. :TU:

My mistake but if you was 1 of the other light heavy you'd be screaming blue murder if the champion hadn't defended the belt in 11 months your clearly above British level and it's obviously a insurance policy if thing don't work out on the 30th, am a big fan I'll be there on the 30th cheering you on but I don't think you should hold the division up

You couldn't be more wrong pal. I just don't believe in vacating titles..
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tony Bellew Vs Bob Ajisafe???

Post by Horse »

Bomber 1 wrote:You couldn't be more wrong pal. I just don't believe in vacating titles..
You'll be stripped if you don't fight Ajisafe.

Why is getting stripped better than vacating?
Post Reply