Agreed. I always thought the general idea was a gradual step up in class, and Friday's fall guy was abysmal. I appreciate you can't always get an incrementally better opponent that the previous one, and I also appreciate that no harm is done to the prospect's development if the occasional bum gets blown away in dramatic fashion. My point with Cornish is that the focus seems to be on padding out his record. I may well be wrong, its just my opinion. Billy Nelson's identified a lot of technical shortcomings with Cornish and if it was as easy as lining up a load of bums then every fighter could be world champ. Learning is done in testing fights against opponents who will fight back and try to win. Is Maloney doing Cornish any good putting him in against inept imports with records like 7-22 and 4-18-3 ? Accepted, facing bums is part of the process but Cornish fought guys with those records last year, and this year he's dropped by a 40 year old Portuguese loser, so is he really being developed and is he really improving from fight to fight or are they just padding out his record ?ScottDetonator wrote:I partly agree with you but surely there are plus points in building a fighter such as to gain more experience with fights and decent sparring, gain confidence, build a bigger fan base and make more money. Look what happened to Dallas after he got thrown in against Price. It totally shattered him as a fighter.JimJim2009 wrote:Maloney could have got Tom Dallas to 25-0 by now if he'd have kept matching him against tumbling latvians instead of stepping up the quality of opposition, but ultimately what would have been the point ?
Not everyone will be a world champion.
I'm not knocking the guy and I'm not on my soapbox saying they're getting it badly wrong with him. I just think a 14-0 heavyweight prospect who's that big should be matched better at this point in his career, regardless of his amateur inexperience and even if he is Scottish.