Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post Reply
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by Rover »

These two were titlists at the same time; who takes it? I'd take Omar by decision.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15544
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by giacomino »

Narvaez by UD, something like 116-112, 115-113. Narvaez was and is an excellent boxer, as was Morel at 112, but IMO Narvaez was a little better. Close fight. Narvaez's management should be stoned for not finding a way to get him with the best at 112 in his prime. He should have fought Wongjamkam, Arce and Vic D at fly.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by Rover »

giacomino wrote:Narvaez by UD, something like 116-112, 115-113. Narvaez was and is an excellent boxer, as was Morel at 112, but IMO Narvaez was a little better. Close fight. Narvaez's management should be stoned for not finding a way to get him with the best at 112 in his prime. He should have fought Wongjamkam, Arce and Vic D at fly.
None of those top flies fought each other, so who knows whose fault that was? They were from all over so could carve out their own little kingdoms.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by Rover »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15544
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by giacomino »

Rover wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).
It was retarded that that fight never happened. Although Arce was really strong at that weight, Wonjongkam was probably at or near his prime at the time. Super fight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Narvaez/Morel at fly.

Post by Rover »

giacomino wrote:
Rover wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).
It was retarded that that fight never happened. Although Arce was really strong at that weight, Wonjongkam was probably at or near his prime at the time. Super fight.
Absolutely. Would've been a great PPV undercard fight if it had occurred in the U.S. There was no need for an "interim" WBC champ when PW was defending his title!
Post Reply