James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post Reply
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Ezzard »

Who wins?
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Tomasino »

Ezzard wrote:Who wins?

Weaver. Toney beat very poor heavies.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by The End »

Mike Weaver vs James Toney at heavyweight is an interesting bout.

Toney that beat Holyfield against the Weaver that beat Coetzee.

They come in around the same weight. While Weaver is generally looked at as a crude slugger he had some decent skills. Toney of course was highly skilled but had much less power.

I'm kind of on the fence about this one . I could see it going either way .
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by dempseyfire »

Over 12 Toney could edge it by work-rate. Over 15 I think Weaver grinds him down enough to take a close decision. But close fight either way . . Weaver's biggest problem was sleepwalking through many rounds of fights. When he decided to 'wake up' he was a hell of a fighter, well-rounded/schooled although never very slick or tricky.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by HomicideHenry »

Toney as a heavyweight stopped Holyfield, seriously outpointed the undefeated Rydell Booker, won a decision over Jameel McCline, etc. He certainly has the tools to decision a Mike Weaver, who was an inconsistant fighter whose main strength was his punching power.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Weaver by decision.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Rover »

Weaver edges it.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Rover »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Weaver by decision.
:lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46506
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by gilgamesh »

HomicideHenry wrote:Toney as a heavyweight stopped Holyfield, seriously outpointed the undefeated Rydell Booker, won a decision over Jameel McCline, etc. He certainly has the tools to decision a Mike Weaver, who was an inconsistant fighter whose main strength was his punching power.
I don't recall Toney ever fighting Jameel McCline, they were scheduled to fight once but it was cancelled. He beat Dominick Guinn and drew with Rahman though.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by BoxBuzz »

I'd reluctantly go with Toney on this. I feel my money would be safer.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Bricks »

Toney
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by loaded_gloves »

Weaver.

The Hercules who waged war with the great, prime Larry Holmes, as well as Gerrie Coetzee and Michael Dokes et al, would outwork Fat Toney I think.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by The Great John L »

loaded_gloves wrote:Weaver.

The Hercules who waged war with the great, prime Larry Holmes, as well as Gerrie Coetzee and Michael Dokes et al, would outwork Fat Toney I think.
X2

He was inconsistent, but when he was on Weaver was a very good fighter.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by loaded_gloves »

Inconsistent, yes. But even the Weaver who wasn't on fire, say when he fought John Tate, Quick Tillis and Scott LeDoux was a level of power, fitness and stamina beyond any heavyweight James Toney has beaten.

Toney whilst technically very sound beat old men and fatties. Weaver was neither of those and very, very dangerous.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: James Toney v Mike Weaver

Post by Rover »

loaded_gloves wrote:Inconsistent, yes. But even the Weaver who wasn't on fire, say when he fought John Tate, Quick Tillis and Scott LeDoux was a level of power, fitness and stamina beyond any heavyweight James Toney has beaten.

Toney whilst technically very sound beat old men and fatties. Weaver was neither of those and very, very dangerous.
:TU:
Post Reply