sky sports card 20th April

robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by robpalmer135 »

@markmcgee87 wrote:Yeah but seeing how Eddie has more resources, better fighters and a bigger platform shouldn't it be a given that he is putting on bigger and better shows?
According to Frank, allegedly has close to 200,000 subscribers which is more viewers than 95% of Sky shows and £2million income per month, which I guarantee is a hell of allot more than Matchroom are getting a month from Sky for Boxing.
Last edited by robpalmer135 on 20 Mar 2013, 12:26, edited 1 time in total.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by 15829 »

Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Eddie himself said he's embarrassed by some of the Matchroom shows before Prizefighter
He should be embarrassed by the March 9th show.

2 of the 5 fights were entertaining
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by 15829 »

robpalmer135 wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Yeah but seeing how Eddie has more resources, better fighters and a bigger platform shouldn't it be a given that he is putting on bigger and better shows?
According to Warren, Allegedly channel was close to 200,000 subscribers which is more viewers than 95% of Sky shows and £2million income per month, which I guarantee is a hell of allot more than Matchroom are getting a month from Sky for Boxing.

Are you banned of ESB again

You forgot the bit were he said at it's peak and your not stupid we both no that Frank is on his arse so Eddie has more resources and a bigger platform to showcase hos fighters
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by Horse »

@markmcgee87 wrote:2 of the 5 fights were entertaining
Only Camacho vs Clarke was competetive.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by 15829 »

Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:2 of the 5 fights were entertaining
Only Camacho vs Clarke was competetive.

Are you forgetting about Connor v Evangulu?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by Horse »

@markmcgee87 wrote:Are you forgetting about Connor v Evangulu?
Connor won fairly comfortably.

That was only an area level fight anyway. Hearn wasn't willing to risk his bigger names in competetive fights. Awful show.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by 15829 »

Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Are you forgetting about Connor v Evangulu?
Connor won fairly comfortably.

That was only an area level fight anyway. Hearn wasn't willing to risk his bigger names in competetive fights. Awful show.


I agree the 3 main fight were not competitive
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by ashedward »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
Horse wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Eddie himself said he's embarrassed by some of the Matchroom shows before Prizefighter
He should be embarrassed by the March 9th show.

2 of the 5 fights were entertaining
Yep much better then the 1 live fight which more often then not was a mismatch and some taped stuff after like the old FFN format.However if that show was the norm was the the norm then Hearn is failing because he`s capable of puting on much better shows then that and Sky will expect much better and for the most part he puts on really good shows i think March the 9th will be a blip.
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by robpalmer135 »

@markmcgee87 wrote:
robpalmer135 wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Yeah but seeing how Eddie has more resources, better fighters and a bigger platform shouldn't it be a given that he is putting on bigger and better shows?
According to Warren, Allegedly channel was close to 200,000 subscribers which is more viewers than 95% of Sky shows and £2million income per month, which I guarantee is a hell of allot more than Matchroom are getting a month from Sky for Boxing.

Are you banned of ESB again

You forgot the bit were he said at it's peak and your not stupid we both no that Frank is on his arse so Eddie has more resources and a bigger platform to showcase hos fighters
nope.

yeh i was on the wind up. but....frank said they peaked and 240,000, went back to 120,000 and are now close to 200k again

March 9th and April 20th are not good enough no doubt about it but I think Skys plans with Boxing is long term and there will be hits and misses in the first year. March 9th was still the 3rd best show of the year in the UK.....which is really really shit but it shows you where were at.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by 15829 »

I agree
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by Horse »

robpalmer135 wrote:March 9th was still the 3rd best show of the year in the UK.....which is really really shit but it shows you where were at.
Frankie Gavin vs Jason Welborn - January 18th
Martin Gethin vs Ben Murphy
Chris Keane vs Shane McPhilbin

Frampton vs Martinez - February 9th
Lee Selby vs Martin Lindsay
Andy Lee vs Anthony Fitzgerald

Tony Thompson vs David Price - February 23rd
Kevin Satchell vs Luke Wilton
Darren Hamilton vs Steve Williams

Audley Harrison - Prizefighter - February 23rd


I think these shows were better.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by broomy7s »

I think this is a really decent card for a small hall. Winter Gardens isn't very big. I think it's a huge step up for Brian rose, Selby is classy and will hopefully be tested, Cardle in a test against an unbeaten fighter and gorgeous Eddie is trying to put a couple of local lads on the card in Askin & Arnfield. Then there's also the prospects.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by magnus »

The OP needs to hop in a time machine, to experience early 00s Sky in all it's WBF-title-shaped splendor.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by pyenest77 »

I dont think the card is that bad & surely there are more names to be announced.
I have been watching live boxing for years & with the current amount of Latvian/Lithuanian lemmings coming over here & allegedly lack of decent home fights (it will be interesting to see how even Bunce can put some positive spin on tomorrow nights events). I think it is 1 of a couple of stand out cards coming up.
Rose v Alcine - Seen a lot worse
Cardle v Hughes - 2 Unbeatens. Could be good
Askin v Clarke - Both have winning records. Potentially a good fight.
Selby - Great prospect will be interesting to see who he is meeting
Yafai, Smith & Stalker great prospects.
As I have stated before I have a "boxing budget" that I set aside for decent bills & so far my budget is pretty much untouched apart from the last Coldwell show & the tickets for this.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by TheCobra »

mullenman wrote:I do like eddie Hearn and respect what he is trying to do for his stable of fights but the card schedualed for sky sports on the 20th april is just not acceptable as a paying skysports subscriber (only reason i have sky sports is for the boxing)


10x3 light middleweight Brian Rose 22(6)-1(1)-1
SC Joachim Alcine 33(19)-3(3)-1

10x3 light welterweight Scott Cardle 9(2)-0-0
SC Maxi Hughes 8-0-1

super middleweight Callum Smith 3(1)-0-0
SC TBA

bantamweight Khalid Yafai 7(6)-0-0
light welterweight Thomas Stalker 1-0-0
featherweight Lee Selby 14(5)-1-0


i think this is shaping up as the worst card in sky sports history
sort is out Eddie Hearn and Adam smith
Another gash show from Hearn, really poor stuff. Boxing on SKy rarely holds any interest for me these days, what with Prizefighter and this sort of junk, how do they really expect people to WANT to watch this shit?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by Horse »

I wanted Selby vs Mouneimne, but I doubt that will be on this undercard.

This card isn't looking very good at the moment.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13358
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by MightyWarrior »

Absolute crap - this is meant to be a premium boxing channel - they certainly charge customers premium prices, and for very little boxing, so when they do show it, it should be the very best stuff - not this low rent small hall stuff served up by Hearn, who seems to have the clueless Adam Smith in his back pocket now.

Sky are meant to be the UK equivelant of HBO - and just think of the huge fights HBO serve up compared this dross.


His dad nearly ruined sky boxing back in the 80's, by selling them a dud 12 fight deal with Eubank, against a long line of hopeless stiffs, and now Junior is doing the same thing here.

And Smith has turned what was once a great boxing channel into Eurosport2
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by leforge »

pyenest77 wrote:I dont think the card is that bad & surely there are more names to be announced.
I have been watching live boxing for years & with the current amount of Latvian/Lithuanian lemmings coming over here & Allegedly channel lack of decent home fights (it will be interesting to see how even Bunce can put some positive spin on tomorrow nights events). I think it is 1 of a couple of stand out cards coming up.
Rose v Alcine - Seen a lot worse
Cardle v Hughes - 2 Unbeatens. Could be good
Askin v Clarke - Both have winning records. Potentially a good fight.
Selby - Great prospect will be interesting to see who he is meeting
Yafai, Smith & Stalker great prospects.
As I have stated before I have a "boxing budget" that I set aside for decent bills & so far my budget is pretty much untouched apart from the last Coldwell show & the tickets for this.
Samir apparently turned down selby!
smoothmoves
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 287
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by smoothmoves »

I thought Tim Bradley vs Ruslan was a mis match, but I was wrong. Wonderfully entertaining fight. My point is, shouldn't we reserve judgement until after the event? I like to watch Rose, and this is a good step up for him. The undercard could very well produce some good solid entertainment, we just don't know yet.

People keep moaning about this promoter, and that promoter, blah blah blah. Fact is, you will get high profile cards (Froch v Kessler), and you will get lower profile cards (Rose v Alcine). We keep hearing that boxing is about "levels", I want to see boxing at all levels please!
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by magnus »

It is a good step up for Rose, the Clarke-Askin and Cardle-Hughes fights are good support acts, and it remains to be seen who Selby gets matched with.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by ashedward »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
earsjohn wrote: Indeed, but it was still a worse card than the 20th April one, and thus demonstrates that it is not the worst in sky sports broadcast history. Other recent cards worthy of a mention include Vassell v Colomban, Martin Murray v nick Blackwell, John Murray v karim el ouazghari, frankie Gavin v Michael lomax and Ricky burns v laryea (for a world title!)
Should we really have to compare a card to the worst sky card ever? It just shows how shit it is, it doesn't make it better because it isn't the worst.
It's an average card which has a chance to be decent, the op was silly enough to say it is the worst card in history for whatever reason thats why people are putting him right on that . This could be a decent show, if Selby gets a good opponent.
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by ashedward »

smoothmoves wrote:I thought Tim Bradley vs Ruslan was a mis match, but I was wrong. Wonderfully entertaining fight. My point is, shouldn't we reserve judgement until after the event? I like to watch Rose, and this is a good step up for him. The undercard could very well produce some good solid entertainment, we just don't know yet.

People keep moaning about this promoter, and that promoter, blah blah blah. Fact is, you will get high profile cards (Froch v Kessler), and you will get lower profile cards (Rose v Alcine). We keep hearing that boxing is about "levels", I want to see boxing at all levels please!
This
Adam1991
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 304
Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 07:00

Re: sky sports card 20th April

Post by Adam1991 »

mullenman wrote:I do like eddie Hearn and respect what he is trying to do for his stable of fights but the card schedualed for sky sports on the 20th april is just not acceptable as a paying skysports subscriber (only reason i have sky sports is for the boxing)


10x3 light middleweight Brian Rose 22(6)-1(1)-1
SC Joachim Alcine 33(19)-3(3)-1

10x3 light welterweight Scott Cardle 9(2)-0-0
SC Maxi Hughes 8-0-1

super middleweight Callum Smith 3(1)-0-0
SC TBA

bantamweight Khalid Yafai 7(6)-0-0
light welterweight Thomas Stalker 1-0-0
featherweight Lee Selby 14(5)-1-0


i think this is shaping up as the worst card in sky sports history
sort is out Eddie Hearn and Adam smith
Shut up you plant pot
Post Reply