foxy01 wrote:No point. Yanks will vote for Yanks. It's ok everyone else understands, but it isn't to be taken seriously.
Foreman
Frazier
Holyfield
Johnson, and
Holmes
All above Lewis? yeah right.
How come Lewis didn't keep his word about giving V. Klitscho a rematch?
Mum didn't think it was such a good idea, eh?
Why would a 38 year old lacking motivation with more than a $100 million in the bank bother about rematches? Get real.
Because Mummy said no, I reckon.[/quote]
Could be right, but doubtful.
Would you like to give me a list of Heavies that are worth more than a $100 million dollars today, ( not earned it, but kept it and still have it ) then we will discuss whose mum said what. [/quote]
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It was poorly executed. Someone like Lawlor instead of Dejesus and you would have nailed it.
Lawlor was when Duran was finished. You're just being stupid now.
Listing DeJesus in response to his statement was stupid. H What's really ironic is that you chastised me over not being able to admit when I'm wrong. Here's your chance big man.
Last edited by SaadOffTheDeck on 21 Mar 2013, 16:35, edited 2 times in total.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It was poorly executed. Someone like Lawlor instead of Dejesus and you would have nailed it.
Lawlor was when Duran was finished. You're just being stupid now.
Listing DeJesus in response to his statement was stupid. What's really ironic is that you chastised me over not being able to admit when I'm wrong. Here's your chance big man.
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Lawlor was when Duran was finished. You're just being stupid now.
Listing DeJesus in response to his statement was stupid. What's really ironic is that you chastised me over not being able to admit when I'm wrong. Here's your chance big man.
I'm wrong.
You admitted you were wrong and the board crashed for a minute. My bad, don't do that again.
1. Don King drove to his house with a contract for a fight with Tyson and asked him to sign it.
2. George didn't come back to fight any particular boxer, he just came back for the title.
The floor is yours.
Ahh, so that's what has your bee in a bonnet? If I was wrong I would have admitted it then. Don King never wanted Tyson to face Foreman. Not for one second.
1. Don King drove to his house with a contract for a fight with Tyson and asked him to sign it.
2. George didn't come back to fight any particular boxer, he just came back for the title.
The floor is yours.
Ahh, so that's what has your bee in a bonnet? If I was wrong I would have admitted it then. Don King never wanted Tyson to face Foreman. Not for one second.
George came back for money.
You really are an egomaniac. Foreman clearly states facts on live television and you being the loon you are, think he's just making it up.
1. Don King drove to his house with a contract for a fight with Tyson and asked him to sign it.
2. George didn't come back to fight any particular boxer, he just came back for the title.
The floor is yours.
Ahh, so that's what has your bee in a bonnet? If I was wrong I would have admitted it then. Don King never wanted Tyson to face Foreman. Not for one second.
George came back for money.
You really are an egomaniac. Foreman clearly states facts on live television and you being the loon you are, think he's just making it up.
You're the one whose ego has had you pissing and moaning at me since the original thread and now you're bringing it up again. I've admitted I was wrong many times, if you don't recall them than that's your problem.
I didn't watch your video, it doesn't concern me. Public figures say things all of the time. You already said the King offer was only for 5 million dollars. That's the oldest trick in the business world, low ball someone into saying no and it takes the blame off of you.
As I told you in the actual thread a month or two ago. We will never agree on it so there is no need to go further.
Wow, and this is the guy bragging about his wonderful life? Still obsessing over the same dead end.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Your the one whose ego has had you pissing and moaning at me since the original thread and now you're bringing it up again. I've admitted I was wrong many times, if you don't recall them than that's your problem.
I didn't watch your video, it doesn't concern me. Public figures say things all of the time. You already said the King offer was only for 5 million dollars. That's the oldest trick in the business world, low ball someone into saying no and it takes the blame off of you.
As I told you in the actual thread a month or two ago. We will never agree on it so there is no need to go further.
Wow, and this is the guy bragging about his wonderful life? Still obsessing over the same dead end.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Your the one whose ego has had you pissing and moaning at me since the original thread and now you're bringing it up again. I've admitted I was wrong many times, if you don't recall them than that's your problem.
I didn't watch your video, it doesn't concern me. Public figures say things all of the time. You already said the King offer was only for 5 million dollars. That's the oldest trick in the business world, low ball someone into saying no and it takes the blame off of you.
As I told you in the actual thread a month or two ago. We will never agree on it so there is no need to go further.
Wow, and this is the guy bragging about his wonderful life? Still obsessing over the same dead end.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Your the one whose ego has had you pissing and moaning at me since the original thread and now you're bringing it up again. I've admitted I was wrong many times, if you don't recall them than that's your problem.
I didn't watch your video, it doesn't concern me. Public figures say things all of the time. You already said the King offer was only for 5 million dollars. That's the oldest trick in the business world, low ball someone into saying no and it takes the blame off of you.
As I told you in the actual thread a month or two ago. We will never agree on it so there is no need to go further.
Wow, and this is the guy bragging about his wonderful life? Still obsessing over the same dead end.
Go back to sleep...... on your own.
What a child you are.
I know I'm childish, it's one of my better qualities.
Dempsey never 'refused' to fight black fighters; he was ready to fight Wills but Rickard nixed the fight. And besides Wills, Langford (by the time Dempsey arose as a top contender in 1917-18) was getting beat-up by Fred Fulton (who Jack annihilated in one round), McVey was fighting in Panama, and Jeannette past his best and relatively inactive.
He signed to fight Wills. None of the other top black heavyweights would have had a chance. Their time had gone. And unfortunately their lack of title chances falls at Johnson's feet.
My guess is that Wills would have beaten Dempsey pre-Willard. But once Dempsey became champ I think he'd have won.
If Jack only missed one challenger out then that's a lot better than many guys who are getting ranked above him.
[/quote]
