Heavy or Straw?

Post Reply
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Heavy or Straw?

Post by handsofstone »

Why is it that on British(probably European) TV they always insist on showing big dumplings fighting in either mismatches or the ones that are competitive are probably more often than not snoozefests,is it just me that would like to bin the crap German shows and show more Straw through to Bantam bouts, i would love to see more action from South America and Asia,seemingly there are a lot of mini classics in those bouts but i wouldnt know as i cant tell you the last time the showed a world title fight lighter than Bantamweight in Britain
PS i bet they show the Brian Viloria card this weekend over here now :oops:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by Horse »

The heavyweight division is far more important than the strawweight division. I pick heavyweight.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by handsofstone »

Horse wrote:The heavyweight division is far more important than the strawweight division. I pick heavyweight.
C,mon isnt about time for sanitys sake to move with the times and give up on the Heavyweights,nothings happened for years,nothings happening now and nothing looks like happening anytime soon,the sooner we all just accept its shite with no-one on the horizon the sooner we can all move on,even if the second coming of Ali/Tyson comes along whats the chances of anybody being on their level coming along also? Doesnt matter if Deontay Wilder is the real deal and was to beat the Klitschkos,everybody knows their nearing the tailend of their careers so he wont get the credit so round and round we go
I FUDGIN HATE THE HEAVYWEIGHTS THE MORE I THINK ABOUT IT :twisted: altough i,ll never stop watching them because i love boxing and im a stubborn fuk-wit whos scared of missing something AND all this time we,re waiting on the next Heavyweight hope we,re missing some cracking Flyweight action
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by handsofstone »

MachoMan09 wrote:How many strawweights are there on the planet? Even in famine stricken Asian concentration camps you'd struggle to find an adult male who can do seven and a half stone.
Is that true? i must admit in all the years iv watched boxing ive only seen a handful of Strawweight contests,its more the Lightfly through to Superfly im talking about :TU:
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by Datsue »

handsofstone wrote:
Horse wrote:The heavyweight division is far more important than the strawweight division. I pick heavyweight.
C,mon isnt about time for sanitys sake to move with the times and give up on the Heavyweights,nothings happened for years,nothings happening now and nothing looks like happening anytime soon,the sooner we all just accept its shite with no-one on the horizon the sooner we can all move on,even if the second coming of Ali/Tyson comes along whats the chances of anybody being on their level coming along also? Doesnt matter if Deontay Wilder is the real deal and was to beat the Klitschkos,everybody knows their nearing the tailend of their careers so he wont get the credit so round and round we go
I FUDGIN HATE THE HEAVYWEIGHTS THE MORE I THINK ABOUT IT :twisted: altough i,ll never stop watching them because i love boxing and im a stubborn fuk-wit whos scared of missing something AND all this time we,re waiting on the next Heavyweight hope we,re missing some cracking Flyweight action

:TU: :OhYes:

I'll PM you regarding this weekend's Mario Rodriguez vs Katsunari Takayama fight, mate. Was meant to be a war.

Actually, thinking of that: did you see Adrian Hernandez vs Kompayak Porpramook? Either of 'em? Or the Kazuto Ioka vs Akira Yaegashi fight mate? Let us know...
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Firstly let me say that good fight is a good fight regardless of weight. Secondly you seem to get better matches in the lower divisions than the bigger ones in terms of a proportion, I.e. a higher % of heavyweight fights are duds.

As Datsue said we've recently had an awesome contest at Straw, interestingly from his list he missed Porpramook v Yaegashi from a year or two back.

For my money the lowest 3 weights not only had some of the FOTY contenders last year (Viloria v Hernandez, Ioka v Yaegashi and Gonzalez v Estrada) but also some of the biggest upsets (Rodriguez v Joyi, Jaro v Wonjongkam).
dammage7
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 129
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:00

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by dammage7 »

agree
i wanna c more minimum weights sell out stadiums
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by danconnollyeire »

handsofstone wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:How many strawweights are there on the planet? Even in famine stricken Asian concentration camps you'd struggle to find an adult male who can do seven and a half stone.
Is that true? i must admit in all the years iv watched boxing ive only seen a handful of Strawweight contests,its more the Lightfly through to Superfly im talking about :TU:
We have zero straw (minimumweight) fighters in this country so why would we watch it
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by handsofstone »

danconnollyeire wrote:
handsofstone wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:How many strawweights are there on the planet? Even in famine stricken Asian concentration camps you'd struggle to find an adult male who can do seven and a half stone.
Is that true? i must admit in all the years iv watched boxing ive only seen a handful of Strawweight contests,its more the Lightfly through to Superfly im talking about :TU:
We have zero straw (minimumweight) fighters in this country so why would we watch it
Who said anything about the fighters being FROM this country?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Heavy or Straw?

Post by handsofstone »

Datsue wrote:
handsofstone wrote:
Horse wrote:The heavyweight division is far more important than the strawweight division. I pick heavyweight.
C,mon isnt about time for sanitys sake to move with the times and give up on the Heavyweights,nothings happened for years,nothings happening now and nothing looks like happening anytime soon,the sooner we all just accept its shite with no-one on the horizon the sooner we can all move on,even if the second coming of Ali/Tyson comes along whats the chances of anybody being on their level coming along also? Doesnt matter if Deontay Wilder is the real deal and was to beat the Klitschkos,everybody knows their nearing the tailend of their careers so he wont get the credit so round and round we go
I FUDGIN HATE THE HEAVYWEIGHTS THE MORE I THINK ABOUT IT :twisted: altough i,ll never stop watching them because i love boxing and im a stubborn fuk-wit whos scared of missing something AND all this time we,re waiting on the next Heavyweight hope we,re missing some cracking Flyweight action
Na mate never seen them,havent seen and dont know a great deal about the wee men of boxing i,ll be sure to have a look though thanks :TU:
:TU: :OhYes:

I'll PM you regarding this weekend's Mario Rodriguez vs Katsunari Takayama fight, mate. Was meant to be a war.

Actually, thinking of that: did you see Adrian Hernandez vs Kompayak Porpramook? Either of 'em? Or the Kazuto Ioka vs Akira Yaegashi fight mate? Let us know...
Post Reply