BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
-
wappingboy
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 68
- Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 13:28
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
billy joes called out john ryder now he's got the fight he wants ryder to win in the last 3 rnds stpg
-
markymark1
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 13:08
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
The only reason why the fight won't happen would be because of Saunders choice not Ryder's......Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He has boxed better fighters than Ryder,even if he was flagging or not! The fight wont happen anyhow..
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
I doubt it. More like FW wouldnt want to do it on EH's show more like.markymark1 wrote:The only reason why the fight won't happen would be because of Saunders choice not Ryder's......Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He has boxed better fighters than Ryder,even if he was flagging or not! The fight wont happen anyhow..
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
Saunders to vacate (smoke screen of bigger and better and all that) and ryder vs blackwell for the vacant title
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
Loses a lot of credibility in my eyes like Tyson Fury vacating to avoid Price. I understand this is a business to these guys but BJS has said he won't vacate and wants to win the Lonsdale outright hope he keeps true to his word - cant see it though80/20 wrote:Saunders to vacate (smoke screen of bigger and better and all that) and ryder vs blackwell for the vacant title
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
At least Fury beat Chisora for the title. Who has Saunders beaten?JayMc wrote:Loses a lot of credibility in my eyes like Tyson Fury vacating to avoid Price. I understand this is a business to these guys but BJS has said he won't vacate and wants to win the Lonsdale outright hope he keeps true to his word - cant see it though
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
Good point Horse but still loses credibility. I just don't like it when fighters vacate titles before fighting the best in the division at their level domestically
-
markymark1
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 13:08
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
So you assume those only like and support fighters who are local to them? Why would he have no reason whatsoever to support Saunders? So your saying that no British fans for instance have no reason whatsoever to support or follow say Mayweather because he's from a different countryDead Mouse wrote:Yeah, the Liverpudlian who has no reason whatsoever to support BJS has been overcome by emotionmarkymark1 wrote:How can you say that? Your basically saying that Saunders will beat Ryder out of sight? Your letting your heart rule your head here. It will be a good close fight and it's hard to pick a winner but I edge towards Ryder.Chris W 1982 wrote:Saunders all day.
-
CiganoBoxer
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
BJS is the wrong type of fighter to let that happenhitman_hatton1 wrote:bet warren pulls bjs out.
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
I think they both want the fight - no way BJS is vacating the British he'll want to win it outright no doubt about it
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:He has boxed better fighters than Ryder,even if he was flagging or not! The fight wont happen anyhow..
Please enlighten me to who BJS has boxed who is better than John Ryder......
Re: BILLY JOE SAUNDERS v JOHN RYDER
Chris walker is only good for wwf history & dancing at kebab mans weddings ha!