khan vs diaz + undercard
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Khan in trouble
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Blodhemn wrote:Golden Boy is crapping in his fishnets.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Lol Khan is passed it.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
10-9 round for Diaz almost 10-8 be hurt Khan a couple of time
105-103 Khan
105-103 Khan
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
I didn't even know Diaz vs Khan was happening today. Turned out to be a better fight than most expected. I actually expected Diaz to give Khan a bit of a test, but he's apparently testing him more than I thought.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Khan won the 12 th i had 115-112 Khan but i can tell you he will never be a factor in boxing!! This guy cant take a punch... HE HAS NO CHIN!!!
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Imagine if it'd been Matthysse in there.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
115-112
115-113
Didnt ear the third one Khan won unanimous decision
115-113
Didnt ear the third one Khan won unanimous decision
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Diaz isn t a big puncher just like Rover said imagine Matthysse in there and he is not surviving!! Maybe he can fight Malignaggi until he end his carreer and he ll be ok!The Dark Destroyer wrote:How did he make it through that fight then? He has a bad chin, but people exaggerate, if it was as bad as you're making out he would have lost this fight.Cloutov wrote:Khan won the 12 th i had 115-112 Khan but i can tell you he will never be a factor in boxing!! This cant take a punch... HE HAS NO CHIN!!!
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Good stuff from Diaz, Khan's heart is amazing for how badly he gets hurt. I think he just cost himself a Mayweather paycheck in September.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Ok you are a fan of Amir and i can appreciate his speed footwork and style but he can not face elite opponent each time he will go down badly! Sorry dude nothing against you but Amir is a chinny fighter
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
He gets hurt far too often. Diaz isn't a huge puncher and had Khan hurt 4 or 5 times. ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Yep Julio Diaz giving you just about all you can handle isn't going to make too many peoples mouth water to see you against one of the very best Boxers in the sport.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Good stuff from Diaz, Khan's heart is amazing for how badly he gets hurt. I think he just cost himself a Mayweather paycheck in September.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
The Dark Destroyer wrote:Saying a fighter will get stopped by one of the best punchers in the division and then saying it's because he's chinny is laughable.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Saying Khan isn't chinny is even more laughable.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Why?The Dark Destroyer wrote:Saying a fighter will get stopped by one of the best punchers in the division and then saying it's because he's chinny is laughable.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
What? It would be more because he is against one of the best punchers than Khan being chinny.crusader wrote:Why?The Dark Destroyer wrote:Saying a fighter will get stopped by one of the best punchers in the division and then saying it's because he's chinny is laughable.
Khan doesn't have the best chin, but if it was as bad as people say, he would have lost tonight. And the KD was due to footwork rather than chin.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
What?
Are you confused?
Why does facing a big puncher mean that a bad chin cannot be a decisive factor in deciding the outcome? It may be that if Khan cannot withstand punches from LM that he could if he weren't chinny.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
And what if Matthyse only lands punches on Khan that most fighters, but not Khan, could survive?The Dark Destroyer wrote:Because Mattysee stops fighters with decent chins, saying he would beat Khan because he has a bad chin is absurd. If his chin was that bad light punchers would stop him, and they don't. He clearly has a poor chin but it's nowhere near as bad as people make out.crusader wrote:Why?The Dark Destroyer wrote:Saying a fighter will get stopped by one of the best punchers in the division and then saying it's because he's chinny is laughable.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Or it could just be because Matthyse throws bombs? Your reaching to make the point valid. It just isn't.crusader wrote:What?
Are you confused?
Why does facing a big puncher mean that a bad chin cannot be a decisive factor in deciding the outcome? It may be that if Khan cannot withstand punches from LM that he could if he weren't chinny.
If Matthyse catches Khan on the chin, I expect him to sleep. Just like most others.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Why is it strange?The Dark Destroyer wrote:That's the strangest question I've ever been asked on here, and I have no idea how to answer it.crusader wrote:
And what if Matthyse only lands punches on Khan that most fighters, but not Khan, could survive?
My point still stands, a bad chin is cracked by light punchers, pointing to the best puncher in the division is a ridiculous measure for such an alleged poor chin.
Khan is very fast on his feet and LM will likely have problems catching him cleanly. It may be that LM can only connect regularly with glancing shots that Khan could hold if his chin weren't poor.
You're suggesting that a poor chin cannot be a decisive factor in a bout involving punchers, and I think that's just as laughable as claiming that Khan would lose to a big puncher because of his chin.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
Saying a fighter will get stopped by one of the best punchers in the division and then saying it's because he's chinny is laughable.
So can it or can't it? And if it can, why is it laughable to suggest that he would lose because he's chinny?I haven't suggested it can't be a deciding factor
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
You dun did. "I'm not saying he isn't but he isn't".The Dark Destroyer wrote:Who said that?Blodhemn wrote:Saying Khan isn't chinny is even more laughable.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
I'm not reaching at all.DMA1987 wrote:Or it could just be because Matthyse throws bombs? Your reaching to make the point valid. It just isn't.crusader wrote:What?
Are you confused?
Why does facing a big puncher mean that a bad chin cannot be a decisive factor in deciding the outcome? It may be that if Khan cannot withstand punches from LM that he could if he weren't chinny.
If Matthyse catches Khan on the chin, I expect him to sleep. Just like most others.
Khan's poor chin may prevent him from surviving in situations which more durable fighters could survive, and that could lead to a Khan loss when he would've otherwise won.
Re: khan vs diaz + undercard
There you go.The Dark Destroyer wrote:I never said he wasn't, and I'm not a big fan so don't start that childish nonsense. If he was as chinny as you make out a light puncher would stop him, and he wouldn't have been able to take what he took tonight. He will lose when big punchers land on him,, it's been that way since he was going life and death with blown up super feathers but his chin is nowhere near as bad as people make out.Cloutov wrote:Ok you are a fan of Amir and i can appreciate his speed footwork and style but he can not face elite opponent each time he will go down badly! Sorry dude nothing against you but Amir is a chinny fighter