so who for David Haye then?

dammage7 · Post by **dammage7** » 28 Apr 2013, 10:21

nothing in pipeline yet
its not Tyson fury
its not wawrzyk

pulev looks likely to fight fury option that haye.
Jonathan banks has lined up Mitchell
helenius in injured.

Chagaev(more marketable) or Luis ortiz(best option based on rankings)
adamek sells well but will crush him with a hayemaker

i think they settle for charr, even though they denied it and said not what they want.

spudder56 · Post by **spudder56** » 28 Apr 2013, 10:25

dammage7 wrote:nothing in pipeline yet
its not Tyson fury
its not wawrzyk

pulev looks likely to fight fury option that haye.
Jonathan banks has lined up Mitchell
helenius in injured.

Chagaev(more marketable) or Luis ortiz(best option based on rankings)
adamek sells well but will crush him with a hayemaker

i think they settle for charr, even though they denied it and said not what they want.

FRAUDLEY LOL

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 28 Apr 2013, 10:29

dammage7 wrote:nothing in pipeline yet
its not Tyson fury
its not wawrzyk

pulev looks likely to fight fury option that haye.
Jonathan banks has lined up Mitchell
helenius in injured.

Chagaev(more marketable) or Luis ortiz(best option based on rankings)
adamek sells well but will crush him with a hayemaker

i think they settle for charr, even though they denied it and said not what they want.

Ruslan wont fight over here due to the hep the BBBoC wont sanction it, adamek vs haye would be a class fight thats what im hoping for but im expecting charr or dimitrenko level guy

Mimmy · Post by **Mimmy** » 28 Apr 2013, 10:54

Who ever the opponent I wonder if he has started training for Haye. We are only 8 weeks away and the opponent or Haye for that matter have not began training for the style of the boxer to face.

dammage7 · Post by **dammage7** » 28 Apr 2013, 11:51

it werent be dimitrenko. not marketable and he is past his sell by date.
would love a boystov but he still unfit.

charr is bookies favorite

luis ortiz is negotiating with David tua, so he may be ruled out.

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 28 Apr 2013, 13:34

Charr saying its official...

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 28 Apr 2013, 13:49

dammage7 wrote:it werent be dimitrenko. not marketable and he is past his sell by date.
would love a boystov but he still unfit.

charr is bookies favorite

luis ortiz is negotiating with David tua, so he may be ruled out.

i mentioned dimitenko because he could be marketed as a klitschko clone to the mass public and thats the level haye will be going after, european level

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 28 Apr 2013, 13:52

MarkMcBurney wrote:Charr saying its official...

Charr is a good fight for Haye.

dammage7 · Post by **dammage7** » 28 Apr 2013, 13:56

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Charr saying its official...
Charr is a good fight for Haye.

but was a crap fight for vitali ..... SMH

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 28 Apr 2013, 13:59

dammage7 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Charr saying its official...
Charr is a good fight for Haye.
but was a crap fight for vitali ..... SMH

SMH?

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:00

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Charr saying its official...
Charr is an easy fight for Haye.

Fixed

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:02

MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Charr saying its official...
Charr is an easy fight for Haye.
Fixed

Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?

Datsue · Post by **Datsue** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:09

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?

Richard "The Secret" Williams

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:13

Datsue wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?
Richard "The Secret" Williams

Ratchet Exits Nu · Post by **Ratchet Exits Nu** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:15

Wilder!!

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:28

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?

I didn't say it wasn't a logical fight, but it won't last 5 rounds.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 28 Apr 2013, 14:37

MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?
I didn't say it wasn't a logical fight, but it won't last 5 rounds.

Does anyone want it to last more than five rounds? I want to see David spank someone.

Gooner123 · Post by **Gooner123** » 28 Apr 2013, 15:08

Wilder??

damianhucker1 · Post by **damianhucker1** » 28 Apr 2013, 15:21

just announced on ssn as manuel charr

Bard of Boxrec · Post by **Bard of Boxrec** » 28 Apr 2013, 15:33

WHY IS HAYE FIGHTING MANUEL CHARR

Mimmy · Post by **Mimmy** » 28 Apr 2013, 15:42

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Who do you think he should fight, someone who is available in 8 weeks?
I didn't say it wasn't a logical fight, but it won't last 5 rounds.
Does anyone want it to last more than five rounds? I want to see David spank someone.

No I want a quick smash so I can get over to Victoria's before most of the crowd

dammage7 · Post by **dammage7** » 28 Apr 2013, 15:43

Riddick Blowe wrote:WHY IS HAYE FIGHTING MANUEL CHARR

cos hes marketable
he can sell a fight
haye will look to get him out in 3 rounds
his interruption of haye at the post chisora fight helped.

and.....no one else is readily available

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 28 Apr 2013, 16:27

hal73 wrote:Would love it to be Deontay Wilder. No chance though :-(

Obviously because its already been anounced as charr

so who for David Haye then?

so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?

Re: so who for David Haye then?