Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
106-105 simpson.
Big round by either could swing it
Big round by either could swing it
-
chucktaylor
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 535
- Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 18:02
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I have it 115-113 Choi. Great fight
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Choi's last 6-5-1
hats off to 2 very hard men.Good scrap,Dont ever listen to Watt!!!
hats off to 2 very hard men.Good scrap,Dont ever listen to Watt!!!
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Good fight, Choi dug really deep and did enough in the last half minute to take the round.
Ultimately though he was not able to keep fighting for 3 minutes a round every round which was the difference 6-5-1 Simpson
Ultimately though he was not able to keep fighting for 3 minutes a round every round which was the difference 6-5-1 Simpson
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
116-112, 117-112, 116-113...winner John Simpson.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Fight stats have Choi wide though
-
btahthezone
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 26 Apr 2012, 20:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
The scorecard was a bit wide but was a cracking fight and very close I had choi by one round.
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
poor form with the belt that!
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
-
smoothmoves
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 287
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
5 rounds is ludicrous.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
116-114 simpson
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
bad scoring
Last edited by jonnyyorkshu on 11 May 2013, 17:03, edited 1 time in total.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Great fight, I had Choi winning it but don't begrudge Simpson this one - he has had a fair
few he won go against him - a definite match between 'irresistible force vs immovable object'
few he won go against him - a definite match between 'irresistible force vs immovable object'
-
jonnyyorkshu
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:12
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
X2Fat Git wrote:Great fight, I had Choi winning it but don't begrudge Simpson this one - he has had a fair
few he won go against him - a definite match between 'irresistible force vs immovable object'
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Been saying for years that he is pishmacaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though![]()
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
You don't have a lot to say, the results of a fight announcement doesn't deviate nor does the facts and figures of the fighters or the sanctioning body ............ christ .......... love to see his fee per event, who was it, that guy that used to be on the bill tv show?sgtcecil wrote:Been saying for years that he is pishmacaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though![]()
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Defo. He must have had his ricky burns announcement cards in his hands there.macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though![]()
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
The MC should be a boxing fan who knows his stuff a mistake like that proves he's just a bit of a Ron burgundy.
Well done Simmo I thought he just done enough
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
While I think the right guy won, the scoring was verging on scandalous, ESP in light of the punch stats.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
There are people on here that would do a perfect job, mistake free and for free ........... not bnovelistShadrachSimmo wrote:Defo. He must have had his ricky burns announcement cards in his hands there.macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though![]()
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
The MC should be a boxing fan who knows his stuff a mistake like that proves he's just a bit of a Ron burgundy.
Well done Simmo I thought he just done enough
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I reckon almost everyone on this forum could do bettermacaca wrote:You don't have a lot to say, the results of a fight announcement doesn't deviate nor does the facts and figures of the fighters or the sanctioning body ............ christ .......... love to see his fee per event, who was it, that guy that used to be on the bill tv show?sgtcecil wrote:Been saying for years that he is pishmacaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though![]()
Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland
-
desperados
- Heavyweight

Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
had Choi winning that one, those cards were hometown alright.
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
Dave Caldwell seems to be in bed with everyone! Ha
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
I thought Choi had it by one.
Blimey the Puerto Rican anthem wasn't up to much haha!
Come on Ricky!
Blimey the Puerto Rican anthem wasn't up to much haha!
Come on Ricky!
Re: Burns v Gonzalez plus undercard
The cards were poor. I had simpson by 2. but never 4 and 5 rounds in it!desperados wrote:had Choi winning that one, those cards were hometown alright.